Best washing method for oligoasthenospermic patients by evaluating DNA integrity by using comet assay study

B. Ganesan, Sumathy Govindarajan
{"title":"Best washing method for oligoasthenospermic patients by evaluating DNA integrity by using comet assay study","authors":"B. Ganesan, Sumathy Govindarajan","doi":"10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_7_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Sperm is more than just a mere transporter of paternal genetic information, although serving purposes other than conception. DNA integrity (DI) is regarded as a crucial aspect of semen quality and has great significance in predicting male fertility. Washing sperm is a form of preparation of sperm which is essential before processing intra-uterine-insemination since it removes chemicals from semen that might cause adversarial reactions in the uterus. During the process of washing, sperm gets separated from seminal fluid, which gradually improves the fertilizing capability of sperm, and numerous existing methods have faced complications with the determination of effective integrity in washing methods. The objective of the present study was to find the DI of the sperms through three washing methods that, include the density gradient (DG) method, swim up (SU) method, and magnetically activated cell sorting (MACS) method after the cryo-preservation (CP) for 3 months. Methodology: Semen samples were obtained from 40 oligoasthenospermic patients with progressive motility <32%, who underwent assisted reproductive technology procedure in Sumathi fertility center in Madurai between October 2021 and December 2021. Sperm washing is performed through three different mentioned techniques. The grades of the comet reflected five different classes from class 0 to class 4. These data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test, and multiple comparisons were performed between these groups using Tukey's test. Results: The results showed a high level of normal sperm (68%) in the DG method than the SU (47%) and MACS (42%) sperm preparation techniques that specified by significant elevation (P < 0.001) of class 0 comet tails. Conclusion: It was observed that the DG method has the best and success rates for intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization was relatively high.","PeriodicalId":52750,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","volume":"12 1","pages":"71 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_7_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sperm is more than just a mere transporter of paternal genetic information, although serving purposes other than conception. DNA integrity (DI) is regarded as a crucial aspect of semen quality and has great significance in predicting male fertility. Washing sperm is a form of preparation of sperm which is essential before processing intra-uterine-insemination since it removes chemicals from semen that might cause adversarial reactions in the uterus. During the process of washing, sperm gets separated from seminal fluid, which gradually improves the fertilizing capability of sperm, and numerous existing methods have faced complications with the determination of effective integrity in washing methods. The objective of the present study was to find the DI of the sperms through three washing methods that, include the density gradient (DG) method, swim up (SU) method, and magnetically activated cell sorting (MACS) method after the cryo-preservation (CP) for 3 months. Methodology: Semen samples were obtained from 40 oligoasthenospermic patients with progressive motility <32%, who underwent assisted reproductive technology procedure in Sumathi fertility center in Madurai between October 2021 and December 2021. Sperm washing is performed through three different mentioned techniques. The grades of the comet reflected five different classes from class 0 to class 4. These data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test, and multiple comparisons were performed between these groups using Tukey's test. Results: The results showed a high level of normal sperm (68%) in the DG method than the SU (47%) and MACS (42%) sperm preparation techniques that specified by significant elevation (P < 0.001) of class 0 comet tails. Conclusion: It was observed that the DG method has the best and success rates for intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization was relatively high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用彗星测定法评价DNA完整性是少弱精子患者的最佳洗涤方法
背景:精子不仅仅是父亲遗传信息的转运者,尽管它的作用不是受孕。DNA完整性(DI)被认为是精液质量的一个重要方面,对预测男性生育能力具有重要意义。清洗精子是一种精子制备方式,在进行子宫内受精之前至关重要,因为它可以去除精液中可能导致子宫对抗性反应的化学物质。在洗涤过程中,精子从精液中分离出来,这逐渐提高了精子的受精能力,许多现有的方法都面临着洗涤方法中有效完整性的确定问题。本研究的目的是通过三种洗涤方法,包括密度梯度(DG)法、向上游动(SU)法和磁激活细胞分选(MACS)法,在冷冻保存(CP)3个月后找到精子的DI。方法:从40名进行性运动<32%的弱精子症患者中获得精液样本,这些患者于2021年10月至2021年12月在马杜赖的Sumathi生育中心接受了辅助生殖技术手术。精子清洗是通过上述三种不同的技术进行的。彗星的等级反映了从0级到4级的五个不同等级。这些数据使用单因素方差分析检验进行分析,并使用Tukey检验在这些组之间进行多重比较。结果:DG方法的正常精子(68%)水平高于SU(47%)和MACS(42%)精子制备技术,这表明0级彗星尾显著升高(P<0.001)。结论:DG法是卵母细胞浆内精子注射和体外受精的最佳方法,成功率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Incidence of Yq Microdeletion among Chattishgarh Population and Cast Based Distribution Morphometric study of nasal parameters in undergraduates at a medical university in central Uttar Pradesh A cadaveric series on urovascular anomalies Insertional footprint of achilles tendon on calcaneal tuberosity in South Indian population: A cadaveric study Novel finding: Hyo-mandibular ligament- A cadaveric study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1