Dissecting the ABA Texas Capital Punishment Assessment Report of 2013: Death and Texas, a Surprising Improvement

P. Metze
{"title":"Dissecting the ABA Texas Capital Punishment Assessment Report of 2013: Death and Texas, a Surprising Improvement","authors":"P. Metze","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3028789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Metze dissects the American Bar Association report, September 2013, entitled Evaluating Fairness and Accuracy in State Death Penalty Systems: The Texas Capital Punishment Assessment Report -- An Analysis of Texas’s Death Penalty Laws, Procedures and Practices. This Report was produced by the ABA’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, specifically the Death Penalty Due Process Review Project, which identified twelve inadequacies in the Texas Capital Punishment System, recommended changes, and evaluated compliance. Now, four years and two legislative sessions later, this paper explores what Texas has done in the interim to improve its death penalty process. Incredibly, the paper concludes that Texas has made great strides in ensuring fairness, reducing the risk of executing the innocent, and preserving public confidence in the criminal justice system. Texas is beginning, in the words of his generation’s poet laureate, to be able to say it did not turn away, failing to hear or see “what sorrow brings” while the condemned silently die.","PeriodicalId":80399,"journal":{"name":"Akron law review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akron law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3028789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professor Metze dissects the American Bar Association report, September 2013, entitled Evaluating Fairness and Accuracy in State Death Penalty Systems: The Texas Capital Punishment Assessment Report -- An Analysis of Texas’s Death Penalty Laws, Procedures and Practices. This Report was produced by the ABA’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, specifically the Death Penalty Due Process Review Project, which identified twelve inadequacies in the Texas Capital Punishment System, recommended changes, and evaluated compliance. Now, four years and two legislative sessions later, this paper explores what Texas has done in the interim to improve its death penalty process. Incredibly, the paper concludes that Texas has made great strides in ensuring fairness, reducing the risk of executing the innocent, and preserving public confidence in the criminal justice system. Texas is beginning, in the words of his generation’s poet laureate, to be able to say it did not turn away, failing to hear or see “what sorrow brings” while the condemned silently die.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖析2013年美国律师协会德克萨斯州死刑评估报告:死亡与德克萨斯州,一个惊人的进步
Metze教授剖析了美国律师协会2013年9月的报告,题为《评估州死刑制度的公平性和准确性:德克萨斯州死刑评估报告——对德克萨斯州死刑法律、程序和实践的分析》。本报告由美国律师协会的个人权利和责任部门,特别是死刑正当程序审查项目编制,该项目确定了德克萨斯州死刑制度的十二个不足之处,建议进行修改,并评估了合规性。现在,在四年零两届立法会议之后,本文探讨了德克萨斯州在此期间为改进死刑程序所做的工作。令人难以置信的是,该论文得出的结论是,德克萨斯州在确保公平、降低处决无辜者的风险以及维护公众对刑事司法系统的信心方面取得了长足进步。用他那一代的桂冠诗人的话来说,得克萨斯州开始能够说它没有转身,没有听到或看到“悲伤带来了什么”,而被谴责的人却默默地死去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk Taking and Rights Balancing in Intellectual Property Law On Individual Participation within Mass Litigation: The Case of the Fairness Hearing Dissecting the ABA Texas Capital Punishment Assessment Report of 2013: Death and Texas, a Surprising Improvement The (Re)newed Barrier to Access to Medication: Data Exclusivity Physical Attractiveness and Femininity: Helpful or Hurtful for Female Attorneys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1