A Novel Feature-Based Manufacturability Assessment System for Evaluating Selective Laser Melting and Subtractive Manufacturing Injection Moulding Tool Inserts

Q2 Engineering Designs Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.3390/designs7030068
Mennatallah F. El Kashouty, A. Rennie, M. Ghazy
{"title":"A Novel Feature-Based Manufacturability Assessment System for Evaluating Selective Laser Melting and Subtractive Manufacturing Injection Moulding Tool Inserts","authors":"Mennatallah F. El Kashouty, A. Rennie, M. Ghazy","doi":"10.3390/designs7030068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Challenges caused by design complexities during the design stages of a product must be coordinated and overcome by the selection of a suitable manufacturing approach. Additive manufacturing (AM) is capable of fabricating complex shapes, yet there are limiting aspects to surface integrity, dimensional accuracy, and, in some instances, design restrictions. Therefore, the goal is essentially to establish the complex areas of a tool during the design stage to achieve the desired quality levels for the corresponding injection moulding tool insert. When adopting a manufacturing approach, it is essential to acknowledge limitations and restrictions. This paper presents the development of a feature-based manufacturability assessment system (FBMAS) to demonstrate the feasibility of integrating selective laser melting (SLM), a metal-based AM technology, with subtractive manufacturing for any given part. The areas on the tool inserts that hold the most geometrical complexities to manufacture are focused on the FBMAS and the design features that are critical for the FBMAS are defined. Furthermore, the structural approach used for developing the FBMAS graphical user interface is defined while explaining how it can be operated effectively and in a user-friendly approach. The systematic approach established is successful in capturing the benefits of SLM and subtractive methods of manufacturing, whilst defining design limitations of each manufacturing method. Finally, the FBMAS developed was validated and verified against the criteria set by experts in the field, and the system’s logic was proven to be accurate when tested. The decision recommendations proved to correlate with the determined recommendations of the field experts in evaluating the feature manufacturability of the tool inserts.","PeriodicalId":53150,"journal":{"name":"Designs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designs","FirstCategoryId":"1094","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/designs7030068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Challenges caused by design complexities during the design stages of a product must be coordinated and overcome by the selection of a suitable manufacturing approach. Additive manufacturing (AM) is capable of fabricating complex shapes, yet there are limiting aspects to surface integrity, dimensional accuracy, and, in some instances, design restrictions. Therefore, the goal is essentially to establish the complex areas of a tool during the design stage to achieve the desired quality levels for the corresponding injection moulding tool insert. When adopting a manufacturing approach, it is essential to acknowledge limitations and restrictions. This paper presents the development of a feature-based manufacturability assessment system (FBMAS) to demonstrate the feasibility of integrating selective laser melting (SLM), a metal-based AM technology, with subtractive manufacturing for any given part. The areas on the tool inserts that hold the most geometrical complexities to manufacture are focused on the FBMAS and the design features that are critical for the FBMAS are defined. Furthermore, the structural approach used for developing the FBMAS graphical user interface is defined while explaining how it can be operated effectively and in a user-friendly approach. The systematic approach established is successful in capturing the benefits of SLM and subtractive methods of manufacturing, whilst defining design limitations of each manufacturing method. Finally, the FBMAS developed was validated and verified against the criteria set by experts in the field, and the system’s logic was proven to be accurate when tested. The decision recommendations proved to correlate with the determined recommendations of the field experts in evaluating the feature manufacturability of the tool inserts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的基于特征的可制造性评估系统,用于评估选择性激光熔化和减法制造注塑模具镶块
在产品的设计阶段,设计复杂性所带来的挑战必须通过选择合适的制造方法来协调和克服。增材制造(AM)能够制造复杂的形状,但在表面完整性、尺寸精度方面存在限制,在某些情况下,还存在设计限制。因此,目标基本上是在设计阶段建立工具的复杂区域,以实现相应注塑工具插件的期望质量水平。在采用制造方法时,必须承认限制和限制。本文介绍了基于特征的可制造性评估系统(FBMAS)的开发,以证明将基于金属的AM技术选择性激光熔化(SLM)与任何给定零件的减法制造相结合的可行性。刀具镶片上最具几何复杂性的区域集中在FBMAS上,并定义了对FBMAS至关重要的设计特征。此外,定义了用于开发FBMAS图形用户界面的结构方法,同时解释了如何以用户友好的方法有效地操作FBMAS。所建立的系统方法成功地捕捉了SLM和减法制造方法的好处,同时定义了每种制造方法的设计限制。最后,根据该领域专家制定的标准对开发的FBMAS进行了验证和验证,并在测试时证明了系统的逻辑是准确的。在评估刀具镶片的特征可制造性时,决策建议与现场专家确定的建议相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Designs
Designs Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mechanical Transmissions with Convex–Concave Multipair Contact of Teeth in Precessional Gearing Design and Operational Assessment of a Railroad Track Robot for Railcar Undercarriage Condition Inspection Computational Investigation of the Fluidic Properties of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Structures in Tissue Engineering Designs of Miniature Optomechanical Sensors for Measurements of Acceleration with Frequencies of Hundreds of Hertz Mapping the Potential of Zero-Energy Building in Greece Using Roof Photovoltaics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1