The Utopian Hypothesis

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1086/721062
D. Sarkar
{"title":"The Utopian Hypothesis","authors":"D. Sarkar","doi":"10.1086/721062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"W hen Isaac Newton declares that he feigns no hypotheses because they are not “deduced from the phenomena,” he marks them as inappropriate to “experimental philosophy.” Many of his followers accentuate his criticism, labeling hypothesis a “dangerous and unscientific product of an unregulated imagination.” By wedding it to imagination— whichwas often associatedwith falsehood and insubstantiality—these criticisms strip hypothesis of its intellectual value and belie the reality that it was a vital component of scientific methods. To underscore its importance in the inductive sciences, by contrast, William Whewell declares in the nineteenth century that the hypothesis “should be close to the facts,” and that the “philosopher should be ready to resign it as soon as the facts","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

W hen Isaac Newton declares that he feigns no hypotheses because they are not “deduced from the phenomena,” he marks them as inappropriate to “experimental philosophy.” Many of his followers accentuate his criticism, labeling hypothesis a “dangerous and unscientific product of an unregulated imagination.” By wedding it to imagination— whichwas often associatedwith falsehood and insubstantiality—these criticisms strip hypothesis of its intellectual value and belie the reality that it was a vital component of scientific methods. To underscore its importance in the inductive sciences, by contrast, William Whewell declares in the nineteenth century that the hypothesis “should be close to the facts,” and that the “philosopher should be ready to resign it as soon as the facts
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌托邦假说
当艾萨克·牛顿宣称他没有假装任何假设,因为它们不是“从现象中推导出来的”时,他将其标记为不适合“实验哲学”。他的许多追随者强调了他的批评,称假设是“不受监管的想象的危险和不科学的产物”。“通过将其与想象结合起来——想象往往与虚假和虚幻联系在一起——这些批评剥夺了假设的智力价值,并掩盖了它是科学方法的重要组成部分的事实。相比之下,为了强调其在归纳科学中的重要性,威廉·惠威尔在19世纪宣称,假设“应该接近事实”,“哲学家应该准备好在事实出现后立即放弃它。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Sidney’s Penetrations: Metaphors and Ideas Margaret Russell, Countess of Cumberland’s Letter to John Layfield: Composing Grief through Consolation and Lamentation A Proof of Pleasure: Renaissance in Rancière, Auerbach, Marlowe Lucy Hutchinson’s Everyday War: The 1640s Manuscript and her Restoration ‘Elegies’ “Noe dish whose tast, or dressing, is unknown / Unto oʳ natives”: Local and Global Material Cultures in the Food Rituals of Thomas Salusbury’s 1634 “Chirk Castle Entertainment”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1