Beyond the Checklist Approach: A Librarian-Faculty Collaboration to Teach the BEAM Method of Source Evaluation

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Communications in Information Literacy Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI:10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.7
J. Mills, Rachael Flynn, N. Fox, Dana Shaw, Claire Walker Wiley
{"title":"Beyond the Checklist Approach: A Librarian-Faculty Collaboration to Teach the BEAM Method of Source Evaluation","authors":"J. Mills, Rachael Flynn, N. Fox, Dana Shaw, Claire Walker Wiley","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluating information is an essential skill, valued across disciplines. While librarians and instructors share the responsibility to teach this skill, they need a common framework in order to collaborate to design assignments that give students multiple opportunities to learn. Librarians and First Year Seminar faculty at Belmont University collaborated to design a unit of instruction on source evaluation using the BEAM method. BEAM requires students to apply a use-based approach to evaluation, to read and engage with sources more closely, and to think about how they might use a source for a specific purpose. Structured annotated bibliographies that included BEAM were assessed, along with student, instructor, and librarian feedback. The BEAM method may be an effective method for teaching information evaluation when paired with other sequenced assignments that guide students through the research and writing process.","PeriodicalId":44439,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Information Literacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Information Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating information is an essential skill, valued across disciplines. While librarians and instructors share the responsibility to teach this skill, they need a common framework in order to collaborate to design assignments that give students multiple opportunities to learn. Librarians and First Year Seminar faculty at Belmont University collaborated to design a unit of instruction on source evaluation using the BEAM method. BEAM requires students to apply a use-based approach to evaluation, to read and engage with sources more closely, and to think about how they might use a source for a specific purpose. Structured annotated bibliographies that included BEAM were assessed, along with student, instructor, and librarian feedback. The BEAM method may be an effective method for teaching information evaluation when paired with other sequenced assignments that guide students through the research and writing process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越清单方法:图书馆与教师合作教授资源评估的BEAM方法
评估信息是一项基本技能,跨学科都很重要。虽然图书馆员和教师有责任教授这项技能,但他们需要一个共同的框架来合作设计作业,为学生提供多种学习机会。贝尔蒙特大学的图书馆员和第一年研讨会的教员合作设计了一个使用BEAM方法进行资源评估的教学单元。BEAM要求学生采用基于使用的方法进行评估,更密切地阅读和接触资料,并思考如何将资料用于特定目的。评估了包含BEAM的结构化注释书目,以及学生、教师和图书管理员的反馈。当与其他指导学生完成研究和写作过程的顺序作业相结合时,BEAM方法可能是一种有效的教学信息评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communications in Information Literacy
Communications in Information Literacy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications in Information Literacy (CIL) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to advancing research, theory, and practice in the area of information literacy in higher education. CIL is independently published. Furthermore, it is open access in the truest sense; there are no article processing charges or other regressive publication fees. The editors of CIL are solely committed to the investigation of various models and theories of information literacy worldwide, and they remain faithful to principles of open access for academic research.
期刊最新文献
Truth or Consequences: Academic Instruction Librarians as Information Literacy and Critical Thinking Activists Quality Matters: Using a Peer-Review Process to Create a Cohesive Multi-Campus Library Online Instruction Program Investigating Faculty Perceptions of Information Literacy and Instructional Collaboration Expanding on the Frames: Making a Case for Algorithmic Literacy Information Literacy in English-Language Higher Education Teaching Journals: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1