Factors Influencing Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Visits to Crepe Myrtle (Lagerstroemia sp.)

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of environmental horticulture Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.24266/0738-2898-39.4.143
T. Bazhaw, D. Drake, Johanna Delgado-Acevedo, D. Harp
{"title":"Factors Influencing Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Visits to Crepe Myrtle (Lagerstroemia sp.)","authors":"T. Bazhaw, D. Drake, Johanna Delgado-Acevedo, D. Harp","doi":"10.24266/0738-2898-39.4.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) are important pollinators and will selectively forage on crepe myrtle (CM) during the summer months. Unfortunately, CM pollen can become contaminated with pesticides used to control insects, especially crepe myrtle bark scale (Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae Kuwana). An experiment was conducted in July and August of 2019 and 2020 to compare honeybee visits to CM among four cultivars (‘Natchez', ‘Tuscarora', ‘Ebony Fire', and ‘Pocomoke') at an isolated location, and within a single cultivar series (Ebony) near other pollinator-friendly plants. ‘Natchez' had the most honeybee visits per tree, averaging 1.4 visits per 75 seconds per tree per day in 2019 and 1.2 visits per 75 seconds per tree per day in 2020, followed by ‘Tuscarora' with 0.8 and 0.4 honeybee visits per 75 seconds per tree per day, in 2019 and 2020, respectively. In 2020, there was a significant, moderate correlation (P< 0.001, r = 0.51) between bloom number and honeybee visits, with ‘Natchez' (158.9) and ‘Tuscarora' (148.2) having more average blooms per tree than ‘Ebony Fire' (35.6) and ‘Pocomoke' (35.7). Landscape environment and proximity to pollinator-friendly plants did not affect honeybee visits. CM are an important foraging resource for honeybees in the summer, and honeybees have a strong preference for cultivars with large, productive bloom clusters.\n Index words: pollinators, crepe myrtle bark scale, Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae, crepe myrtle\n Species used in this study: Crepe myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica L.; Lagerstroemia × faurei; Honeybee, Apis mellifera L.; American bumblebee, Bombus pensylvanicus De Geer.","PeriodicalId":15780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental horticulture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-39.4.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) are important pollinators and will selectively forage on crepe myrtle (CM) during the summer months. Unfortunately, CM pollen can become contaminated with pesticides used to control insects, especially crepe myrtle bark scale (Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae Kuwana). An experiment was conducted in July and August of 2019 and 2020 to compare honeybee visits to CM among four cultivars (‘Natchez', ‘Tuscarora', ‘Ebony Fire', and ‘Pocomoke') at an isolated location, and within a single cultivar series (Ebony) near other pollinator-friendly plants. ‘Natchez' had the most honeybee visits per tree, averaging 1.4 visits per 75 seconds per tree per day in 2019 and 1.2 visits per 75 seconds per tree per day in 2020, followed by ‘Tuscarora' with 0.8 and 0.4 honeybee visits per 75 seconds per tree per day, in 2019 and 2020, respectively. In 2020, there was a significant, moderate correlation (P< 0.001, r = 0.51) between bloom number and honeybee visits, with ‘Natchez' (158.9) and ‘Tuscarora' (148.2) having more average blooms per tree than ‘Ebony Fire' (35.6) and ‘Pocomoke' (35.7). Landscape environment and proximity to pollinator-friendly plants did not affect honeybee visits. CM are an important foraging resource for honeybees in the summer, and honeybees have a strong preference for cultivars with large, productive bloom clusters. Index words: pollinators, crepe myrtle bark scale, Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae, crepe myrtle Species used in this study: Crepe myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica L.; Lagerstroemia × faurei; Honeybee, Apis mellifera L.; American bumblebee, Bombus pensylvanicus De Geer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜜蜂造访紫薇的影响因素
蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)是重要的传粉昆虫,在夏季会有选择地以桃金娘(CM)为食。不幸的是,CM花粉可能会被用于控制昆虫的杀虫剂污染,尤其是桃金娘皮鳞(Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae Kuwana)。在2019年和2020年的7月和8月进行了一项实验,比较了四个品种(“Natchez”、“Tuscarra”、“Ebony Fire”和“Pocomoke”)在一个孤立的地点和其他对传粉昆虫友好的植物附近的单一品种系列(Ebony)中蜜蜂对CM的访问情况Natchez“每棵树的蜜蜂访问次数最多,2019年平均每棵树每天每75秒1.4次,2020年平均每75秒1.2次,其次是Tuscarra”,2019年和2020年分别为每75秒0.8次和0.4次。2020年,开花数量与蜜蜂到访量之间存在显著、中等的相关性(P<0.001,r=0.51),“纳切兹”(158.9)和“塔斯卡拉”(148.2)的平均每棵树开花量高于“乌木之火”(35.6)和“波科莫克”(35.7)。景观环境和靠近传粉昆虫友好植物并不影响蜜蜂到访量。CM是蜜蜂在夏季的重要觅食资源,蜜蜂非常喜欢具有大型、多产花簇的品种。索引词:传粉昆虫,紫薇树皮鳞片,大叶紫薇Acanthococcus lagerstroeiae,紫薇本研究使用的物种:紫薇,紫薇indica L。;紫薇×花;蜜蜂。;美国大黄蜂,Bombus pensylvanicus De Geer。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental horticulture
Journal of environmental horticulture Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Growth of Snapdragon Under Simulated Transparent Photovoltaic Panels for Greenhouse Applications Effects of Insecticide Drench Application against Immatures of Systena frontalis in Container-grown Hydrangea paniculata Influence of Biochar Addition to Nursery Container Media: Trace Gas Efflux, Growth, and Leachate N Plant Benefit Perceptions Influence Consumers' Likelihood to Buy and Differs across Age Cohorts Shifts in the American Floriculture Industry: Insight from Industry Experts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1