A review of evidence on the link between masculinity, loneliness, and suicide as observed in social media discussions

Freddie Jones, Lily Verity, Margarita Panayiotou, Pamela Qualter
{"title":"A review of evidence on the link between masculinity, loneliness, and suicide as observed in social media discussions","authors":"Freddie Jones,&nbsp;Lily Verity,&nbsp;Margarita Panayiotou,&nbsp;Pamela Qualter","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review explores qualitative studies that examined the relationship between loneliness and suicide among young men (18–25 years) as it is discussed on social media. In the 8 papers we identified, analyses validated the relationship between loneliness and suicide in social media discourses. The findings also show that attitudes towards masculinity and mental health prevent some men from discussing mental health issues, which increases loneliness; other men had opportunities to share their experiences openly, breaking preconceived gender rules. Thus, the conceptualizations of gender appeared to affect individuals' expression of their mental health online, with traditional masculine ideals seemingly restricting individuals from reaching out for support, increasing loneliness. Papers often discussed how gender norms negatively impacted the degree to which men felt their mental health issues and loneliness were ‘tellable’. However, there was emerging evidence that some online platforms permitted tellability of men's mental health and loneliness issues. This review highlights the close relationship between loneliness and mental health, and how both are affected by all masculinities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72746,"journal":{"name":"Current research in behavioral sciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518223000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review explores qualitative studies that examined the relationship between loneliness and suicide among young men (18–25 years) as it is discussed on social media. In the 8 papers we identified, analyses validated the relationship between loneliness and suicide in social media discourses. The findings also show that attitudes towards masculinity and mental health prevent some men from discussing mental health issues, which increases loneliness; other men had opportunities to share their experiences openly, breaking preconceived gender rules. Thus, the conceptualizations of gender appeared to affect individuals' expression of their mental health online, with traditional masculine ideals seemingly restricting individuals from reaching out for support, increasing loneliness. Papers often discussed how gender norms negatively impacted the degree to which men felt their mental health issues and loneliness were ‘tellable’. However, there was emerging evidence that some online platforms permitted tellability of men's mental health and loneliness issues. This review highlights the close relationship between loneliness and mental health, and how both are affected by all masculinities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对社交媒体讨论中观察到的男子气概、孤独和自杀之间联系的证据进行综述。
本综述探讨了在社交媒体上讨论的年轻男性(18-25岁)孤独与自杀之间关系的定性研究。在我们确定的8篇论文中,分析证实了社交媒体话语中孤独与自杀之间的关系。研究结果还表明,对男子气概和心理健康的态度使一些男性不愿讨论心理健康问题,这增加了孤独感;其他男性有机会公开分享他们的经历,打破了先入为主的性别规则。因此,性别的概念化似乎影响了个人在网上表达自己的心理健康,传统的男性理想似乎限制了个人寻求支持,增加了孤独感。论文经常讨论性别规范如何对男性认为自己的心理健康问题和孤独感“可诉说”的程度产生负面影响。然而,越来越多的证据表明,一些在线平台允许讲述男性的心理健康和孤独问题。这篇综述强调了孤独和心理健康之间的密切关系,以及所有男性气质如何影响两者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current research in behavioral sciences
Current research in behavioral sciences Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
When a bright future is in mind: Young adults’ positive views on aging contribute to resilience through enhanced sense of control Attitudes towards invisible disabilities: Evidence from behavioral tendencies The stress-busting power of Digital Self-Efficacy: Does training format matter for workers? Semantic analysis of test items through large language model embeddings predicts a-priori factorial structure of personality tests Exploring sensory processing sensitivity: Relationships with mental and somatic health, interactions with positive and negative environments, and evidence for differential susceptibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1