The ideological underpinnings and political usefulness of residential care for children and young people

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI:10.1177/09075682211020069
Sylvia Meichsner
{"title":"The ideological underpinnings and political usefulness of residential care for children and young people","authors":"Sylvia Meichsner","doi":"10.1177/09075682211020069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review takes a close look at three studies exploring residential care for children and young people and the mechanisms that lead to children ending up there. The studies examine three different national settings – Japan, Russia and China (Goodman, 2000; Khlinovskaya Rockhill, 2010; Wang 2016) – exploring the specific historic, economic, political and socio-cultural forces which have shaped the emergence and development of children’s residential care in each country and to which they also respond. Spanning roughly two decades between them, all three studies are concerned with specific and concrete cases (Lund, 2014: 225), focusing on real events, each at a specific place and time in history. Ahead of their time, the three studies connect research foci on children and young people with more far-reaching phenomena, with the insights these connections have to offer enabling a better understanding of the human condition more generally (Spyrou, 2018: 2). All three studies demonstrate how research into residential care for children and young people can serve as a magnifying glass on the wider social, political and economic processes in a given society, as well as on the prevailing value systems that inform conceptualizations of children, childhoods, gender roles and the ideal family. The three studies have not only been chosen because of their high quality, but also because the kind of research which they represent is quite rare – perhaps because conducting it requires a specific combination of formal conditions and a researcher equipped","PeriodicalId":47764,"journal":{"name":"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"459 - 464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/09075682211020069","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09075682211020069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This review takes a close look at three studies exploring residential care for children and young people and the mechanisms that lead to children ending up there. The studies examine three different national settings – Japan, Russia and China (Goodman, 2000; Khlinovskaya Rockhill, 2010; Wang 2016) – exploring the specific historic, economic, political and socio-cultural forces which have shaped the emergence and development of children’s residential care in each country and to which they also respond. Spanning roughly two decades between them, all three studies are concerned with specific and concrete cases (Lund, 2014: 225), focusing on real events, each at a specific place and time in history. Ahead of their time, the three studies connect research foci on children and young people with more far-reaching phenomena, with the insights these connections have to offer enabling a better understanding of the human condition more generally (Spyrou, 2018: 2). All three studies demonstrate how research into residential care for children and young people can serve as a magnifying glass on the wider social, political and economic processes in a given society, as well as on the prevailing value systems that inform conceptualizations of children, childhoods, gender roles and the ideal family. The three studies have not only been chosen because of their high quality, but also because the kind of research which they represent is quite rare – perhaps because conducting it requires a specific combination of formal conditions and a researcher equipped
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青年寄宿照料的思想基础和政治作用
这篇综述仔细研究了三项研究,探讨了儿童和青少年的住宿照顾以及导致儿童最终在那里结束的机制。这些研究考察了三个不同的国家背景——日本、俄罗斯和中国(Goodman, 2000;Khlinovskaya Rockhill, 2010;Wang 2016) -探索特定的历史,经济,政治和社会文化力量,这些力量塑造了每个国家儿童住宿护理的出现和发展,他们也对此做出回应。在他们之间跨越大约二十年,这三个研究都关注具体和具体的案例(Lund, 2014: 225),关注真实的事件,每一个都在历史上的特定地点和时间。这三项研究超前于他们的时代,将儿童和年轻人的研究重点与更深远的现象联系起来,通过这些联系提供的见解,可以更好地了解更普遍的人类状况(Spyrou, 2018):所有三项研究都表明,对儿童和年轻人的寄宿照料的研究可以作为放大镜,反映特定社会中更广泛的社会、政治和经济进程,以及为儿童、童年、性别角色和理想家庭的概念化提供信息的主流价值体系。选择这三项研究不仅是因为它们的高质量,而且还因为它们所代表的研究类型相当罕见——也许是因为进行研究需要正式条件和研究人员装备的特定组合
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research
Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Childhood is a major international peer reviewed journal and a forum for research relating to children in global society that spans divisions between geographical regions, disciplines, and social and cultural contexts. Childhood publishes theoretical and empirical articles, reviews and scholarly comments on children"s social relations and culture, with an emphasis on their rights and generational position in society.
期刊最新文献
Deepening our understanding: Collaboration through online peer-to-peer participatory action research with children. Do children have a right to do nothing? Exploring the place of passive leisure in Australian school age care Different trajectories from a common crisis. Survival migrations and resilience of venezuelan adolescents to Peru Teaching ‘global childhoods’ in Childhood Studies Research ethics in childhood research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1