The cognitive challenges of cooperation in human and nonhuman animals

IF 16.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI:10.1038/s44159-023-00207-7
Alicia P. Melis, Nichola J. Raihani
{"title":"The cognitive challenges of cooperation in human and nonhuman animals","authors":"Alicia P. Melis, Nichola J. Raihani","doi":"10.1038/s44159-023-00207-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cooperation is widespread in nature, occurring in every taxa on Earth. Nevertheless, the contexts in which cooperation occurs — and the forms it takes — vary widely. In this Review, we outline how cooperation can evolve in nature and the cognition needed to support cooperation in different scenarios. We argue that the cognitively simplest forms of cooperation are those where an organism does not need to recognize interaction partners individually and that do not depend upon individuals keeping track of their partners’ actions and making contingent return investments. These simpler cooperative interactions occur most frequently among kin and among interdependent interaction partners and are relatively common in non-human animals. Conversely, cooperation involving individual recognition of interaction partners and where benefits depend upon contingent responses levy greater cognitive demands and occur in non-human animals only in limited contexts. The cognition needed to support cooperation in its multifaceted forms varies in different scenarios. In this Review, Melis and Raihani argue that whether individuals must recognize interaction partners and whether cooperative interactions need investment repayment can differentiate the cognitive demand posed.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"2 9","pages":"523-536"},"PeriodicalIF":16.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-023-00207-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cooperation is widespread in nature, occurring in every taxa on Earth. Nevertheless, the contexts in which cooperation occurs — and the forms it takes — vary widely. In this Review, we outline how cooperation can evolve in nature and the cognition needed to support cooperation in different scenarios. We argue that the cognitively simplest forms of cooperation are those where an organism does not need to recognize interaction partners individually and that do not depend upon individuals keeping track of their partners’ actions and making contingent return investments. These simpler cooperative interactions occur most frequently among kin and among interdependent interaction partners and are relatively common in non-human animals. Conversely, cooperation involving individual recognition of interaction partners and where benefits depend upon contingent responses levy greater cognitive demands and occur in non-human animals only in limited contexts. The cognition needed to support cooperation in its multifaceted forms varies in different scenarios. In this Review, Melis and Raihani argue that whether individuals must recognize interaction partners and whether cooperative interactions need investment repayment can differentiate the cognitive demand posed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类和非人类动物合作的认知挑战
合作在自然界中非常普遍,地球上的每一个类群都有合作。然而,合作发生的环境和形式却千差万别。在这篇综述中,我们将概述合作如何在自然界中演化,以及在不同情况下支持合作所需的认知。我们认为,认知上最简单的合作形式是生物体不需要单独识别互动伙伴,也不依赖于个体跟踪其伙伴的行动和进行或有回报的投资。这些较简单的合作互动最常发生在亲属之间和相互依赖的互动伙伴之间,在非人类动物中也相对常见。相反,涉及个体识别互动伙伴和利益取决于或然反应的合作则对认知能力提出了更高的要求,而且只在有限的情况下出现在非人类动物中。在不同的情况下,支持多形式合作所需的认知也各不相同。在这篇评论中,Melis 和 Raihani 认为,个体是否必须认识互动伙伴以及合作互动是否需要投资回报,会对所提出的认知要求产生不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the lab to a career in the video game industry Modelling game-theoretic predictions in social interactions Pre-stimulus neural activity and visual perception in schizophrenia Event perception and event memory in real-world experience Slow down and be critical before using early warning signals in psychopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1