Automatic cattle weighing on pastures with behavioral analysis during drinking

IF 1.8 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.31893/jabb.23020
R. Uskenov, Arman Mirmanov, Igor Tretyakov, Saule Kuanyshpekovna Bostanova
{"title":"Automatic cattle weighing on pastures with behavioral analysis during drinking","authors":"R. Uskenov, Arman Mirmanov, Igor Tretyakov, Saule Kuanyshpekovna Bostanova","doi":"10.31893/jabb.23020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Livestock body weight (BW) and average daily weight gain (ADG) are primary indicators of beef cattle productivity. The conventional method of weighing involves moving the cattle to a weighing location, which is labor-intensive, stressful for the animals and has a negative impact on their growth. An alternative approach is to use special weighing platforms attached to the drinkers to weigh the animals. This method enables daily monitoring of BW and ADG without incurring additional labor costs or stress. In this study, an experimental weighing platform, previously developed at KazATU and named after S. Seifullin, was employed to measure livestock's partial body weight (PBW). The weighing platform recorded the weights of the animals on the front legs at one-second intervals, allowing for subsequent calculation of the animals' total weight. However, due to significant weight fluctuations observed when the animals were on the platform, the accuracy of calculating the weight based on a simple average of the one-second measurements was questionable. Hence, an algorithm was developed to determine live weight by analyzing the primary data from the scales and identifying moments of animal immobility during drinking. The calculated results were compared with both mean and median values and data from Kazakhstan's information base of selection and breeding work (IBSBW). The experimental method exhibited a stronger correlation (r = 0.925) with the actual IBSBW data compared to the mean method (r = 0.887) or the median method (r = 0.921).","PeriodicalId":37772,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.23020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Livestock body weight (BW) and average daily weight gain (ADG) are primary indicators of beef cattle productivity. The conventional method of weighing involves moving the cattle to a weighing location, which is labor-intensive, stressful for the animals and has a negative impact on their growth. An alternative approach is to use special weighing platforms attached to the drinkers to weigh the animals. This method enables daily monitoring of BW and ADG without incurring additional labor costs or stress. In this study, an experimental weighing platform, previously developed at KazATU and named after S. Seifullin, was employed to measure livestock's partial body weight (PBW). The weighing platform recorded the weights of the animals on the front legs at one-second intervals, allowing for subsequent calculation of the animals' total weight. However, due to significant weight fluctuations observed when the animals were on the platform, the accuracy of calculating the weight based on a simple average of the one-second measurements was questionable. Hence, an algorithm was developed to determine live weight by analyzing the primary data from the scales and identifying moments of animal immobility during drinking. The calculated results were compared with both mean and median values and data from Kazakhstan's information base of selection and breeding work (IBSBW). The experimental method exhibited a stronger correlation (r = 0.925) with the actual IBSBW data compared to the mean method (r = 0.887) or the median method (r = 0.921).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动称重牧场牛与行为分析期间饮酒
牲畜体重(BW)和平均日增重(ADG)是肉牛生产能力的主要指标。传统的称重方法包括将牛移到称重地点,这是劳动密集型的,对动物来说压力很大,对它们的生长有负面影响。另一种方法是使用附在饮酒者身上的特殊称重平台来称动物的体重。这种方法可以每天监测体重和平均日增重,而不会产生额外的人工成本或压力。本研究采用KazATU先前开发的以S. Seifullin命名的实验称重平台来测量牲畜的偏体重(PBW)。称重平台每隔一秒记录动物前腿的重量,以便随后计算动物的总重量。然而,由于观察到动物在平台上的显著体重波动,基于一秒钟测量的简单平均值计算重量的准确性值得怀疑。因此,研究人员开发了一种算法,通过分析秤上的原始数据和识别动物在饮水过程中不动的时刻来确定活重。计算结果与哈萨克斯坦选育工作信息库(IBSBW)的平均值和中位数数据进行了比较。与均值法(r = 0.887)和中位数法(r = 0.921)相比,实验方法与实际IBSBW数据的相关性(r = 0.925)更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology (ISSN 2318-1265) is the official journal of the Center for Applied Animal Biometeorology (Brazil) currently published by Malque Publishing. Our journal is published quarterly, where the published articles are inserted into areas of animal behaviour, animal biometeorology, animal welfare, and ambience: farm animals (mammals, birds, fish, and bees), wildlife (mammals, birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians), pets, animals in zoos and invertebrate animals. The publication is exclusively digital and articles are freely available to the international community. Manuscript submission implies that the data are unpublished and have not been submitted for publication in other journals. JABB publishes original articles in the form of Original Articles, Short Communications, and Reviews. Original Articles arising from research work should be well grounded in theory and execution should follow the scientific methodology and justification for its objectives; Short Communications should provide sufficient results for a publication in accordance with the Research Article; Reviews should involve the relevant scientific literature on the subject. JABB publishes articles in English only. All articles should be written strictly adopting all the rules of spelling and grammar.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of mother–infant interactions between free-ranging and captive rhesus macaques in Kathmandu, Nepal Animal welfare on Argentinean dairy farms based on the Welfare Quality® protocol framework Human-Dog-Relationship and its positive effects on dogs and their humans with special needs Human-animal relationship in water buffalo: quality of stockpeople interactions and their effect on dairy and meat production Hormone secretion in serum of bactrian camels during breeding and nonbreeding seasons: Insights into reproductive physiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1