Greek Texts and the Rigorization of Analysis: An Inquiry into J. L. Lagrange’s Work on the History of Mathematics

Xiaofei Wang
{"title":"Greek Texts and the Rigorization of Analysis: An Inquiry into J. L. Lagrange’s Work on the History of Mathematics","authors":"Xiaofei Wang","doi":"10.3724/sp.j.1461.2020.01139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers a study of J. L. Lagrange’s research on history of mathematics, aiming to clarify Lagrange’s intention in carrying out historical work. To this end, I first document how Lagrange worked with and exerted his influence on other scholars in the translation and diffusion of ancient Greek texts. Second, investigating Lagrange’s style in doing and writing history of mathematics, this paper takes a new perspective and elucidates his motivation in these activities. In particular, it focuses on Lagrange’s presentation of the history of calculus while he was teaching analysis at the Ecole Polytechnique (1795–1799) so as to clarify the function of history in Lagrange’s mathematical works. My thesis is that Lagrange’s intention in examining the different methods employed by his predecessors was to find inspiration and useful contents in his search for the proper approach to mathematical problems. I thus argue in this paper that history served as a guide or methodology for Lagrange’s mathematics. Meanwhile, through an analysis of his historical writing, this paper points to four epistemological values according to which Lagrange judged various historical methods of differential calculus: generality, simplicity, clarity, and rigor. Lagrange’s move to rigorize analysis was connected to his interest in and research of Greek texts; he was attempting to introduce the rigor of the ancient Greeks’ demonstration in his works of analysis.","PeriodicalId":61293,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Annals of History of Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Annals of History of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1461.2020.01139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper offers a study of J. L. Lagrange’s research on history of mathematics, aiming to clarify Lagrange’s intention in carrying out historical work. To this end, I first document how Lagrange worked with and exerted his influence on other scholars in the translation and diffusion of ancient Greek texts. Second, investigating Lagrange’s style in doing and writing history of mathematics, this paper takes a new perspective and elucidates his motivation in these activities. In particular, it focuses on Lagrange’s presentation of the history of calculus while he was teaching analysis at the Ecole Polytechnique (1795–1799) so as to clarify the function of history in Lagrange’s mathematical works. My thesis is that Lagrange’s intention in examining the different methods employed by his predecessors was to find inspiration and useful contents in his search for the proper approach to mathematical problems. I thus argue in this paper that history served as a guide or methodology for Lagrange’s mathematics. Meanwhile, through an analysis of his historical writing, this paper points to four epistemological values according to which Lagrange judged various historical methods of differential calculus: generality, simplicity, clarity, and rigor. Lagrange’s move to rigorize analysis was connected to his interest in and research of Greek texts; he was attempting to introduce the rigor of the ancient Greeks’ demonstration in his works of analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希腊语篇与分析的严格化——对拉格朗日数学史著作的探讨
本文对拉格朗日的数学史研究进行了研究,旨在阐明拉格朗日开展历史工作的意图。为此,我首先记录了拉格朗日在翻译和传播古希腊文本时是如何与其他学者合作并对其施加影响的。其次,考察拉格朗日从事数学史研究和写作的风格,从一个新的角度阐释了拉格朗日从事这些活动的动机。特别关注拉格朗日在巴黎综合理工学院(Ecole Polytechnique, 1795-1799)教授分析时对微积分史的阐述,以阐明历史在拉格朗日数学著作中的作用。我的论点是,拉格朗日研究前人使用的不同方法的目的是为了在他寻找解决数学问题的正确方法时找到灵感和有用的内容。因此,我在本文中认为,历史是拉格朗日数学的指导或方法论。同时,通过对拉格朗日历史著作的分析,指出拉格朗日判断各种历史的微分方法所依据的四个认识论价值:一般性、简单性、清晰性和严谨性。拉格朗日对分析的严谨化与他对希腊文本的兴趣和研究有关;他试图在他的分析著作中引入古希腊论证的严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊最新文献
The Emergence of Appropriate Technology: The Localization of German Krupp Artillery Technology in China (1866–1932) Review of Victor Seow, Carbon Technocracy: Energy Regimes in Modern East Asia Towards Planning Science and Technology in China in the 1950s The Transformation of Engineering Disciplines at Tsinghua University and the Soviet Influence Therein (1952–1960) Strategy and Practice: John B. Grant and the Rockefeller Foundation’s International Health Board in China (1917–1927)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1