What’s Alter Got to Do with It? A Consideration of Network Content and the Social Ties That Provide It

IF 4.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Theory Pub Date : 2019-08-29 DOI:10.1177/0735275119869344
J. Greenberg
{"title":"What’s Alter Got to Do with It? A Consideration of Network Content and the Social Ties That Provide It","authors":"J. Greenberg","doi":"10.1177/0735275119869344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strength of weak ties is among the most important theories in the social sciences. One paradoxical element of the theory has been widely understood and valued—that weak ties connect disparate regions of social structure. Less appreciated, however, is the arguably more paradoxical implication that someone only weakly connected to another would provide value beyond that which is provided by the recipient’s (ego’s) strong ties. Once this paradoxical feature of the theory and associated empirical literatures is acknowledged, the interests of the resource provider (alter) demand consideration. To do so faithfully requires first, the concession that different types of content can be transmitted across ties (e.g., financial, informational, physical, social) and content varies in important ways that relate to alter’s interests and concerns. This article considers social network content and the strength of ties that provide different forms of it. The case of startups is used as a fruitful strategic research site because of the varied resources required at various stages of the startup process. Novel insights are proposed concerning what content flows across different types of social relationships in the context of “nascent” entrepreneurship. Examples from other contexts such as job search are also discussed to exemplify scope. Importantly, this article takes the perspective of the resource provider, alter, and considers her concerns about trust, misuse, and unauthorized transfer in dyadic exchange. In the process, a second paradoxical feature of the theory is identified and theorized, which usefully reveals the boundaries of exchange.","PeriodicalId":48131,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0735275119869344","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275119869344","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

The strength of weak ties is among the most important theories in the social sciences. One paradoxical element of the theory has been widely understood and valued—that weak ties connect disparate regions of social structure. Less appreciated, however, is the arguably more paradoxical implication that someone only weakly connected to another would provide value beyond that which is provided by the recipient’s (ego’s) strong ties. Once this paradoxical feature of the theory and associated empirical literatures is acknowledged, the interests of the resource provider (alter) demand consideration. To do so faithfully requires first, the concession that different types of content can be transmitted across ties (e.g., financial, informational, physical, social) and content varies in important ways that relate to alter’s interests and concerns. This article considers social network content and the strength of ties that provide different forms of it. The case of startups is used as a fruitful strategic research site because of the varied resources required at various stages of the startup process. Novel insights are proposed concerning what content flows across different types of social relationships in the context of “nascent” entrepreneurship. Examples from other contexts such as job search are also discussed to exemplify scope. Importantly, this article takes the perspective of the resource provider, alter, and considers her concerns about trust, misuse, and unauthorized transfer in dyadic exchange. In the process, a second paradoxical feature of the theory is identified and theorized, which usefully reveals the boundaries of exchange.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这和Alter有什么关系?网络内容与提供网络内容的社会联系的思考
弱联系的强弱是社会科学中最重要的理论之一。该理论的一个矛盾元素已经被广泛理解和重视,即薄弱的联系将社会结构的不同区域联系起来。然而,人们不太欣赏的是一种可以说更矛盾的暗示,即一个人与另一个人的联系很弱,就会提供超出接受者(自我)强大联系所提供的价值。一旦理论和相关经验文献的这种矛盾特征得到承认,资源提供者的利益就会改变需求考虑。要做到这一点,首先需要做出让步,即不同类型的内容可以通过关系(例如,财务、信息、物理、社交)进行传输,并且内容在与alter的兴趣和担忧相关的重要方面有所不同。本文考虑了社交网络的内容和提供不同形式社交网络的纽带的强度。创业案例被用作一个富有成效的战略研究网站,因为创业过程的各个阶段需要不同的资源。关于“新生”创业背景下不同类型的社会关系中的内容流动,提出了新的见解。还讨论了求职等其他背景下的例子,以举例说明范围。重要的是,本文从资源提供者的角度出发,改变并考虑了她对二元交换中的信任、滥用和未经授权的转移的担忧。在这个过程中,该理论的第二个悖论特征被识别和理论化,这有助于揭示交换的边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Theory
Sociological Theory SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.80%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Published for the American Sociological Association, this important journal covers the full range of sociological theory - from ethnomethodology to world systems analysis, from commentaries on the classics to the latest cutting-edge ideas, and from re-examinations of neglected theorists to metatheoretical inquiries. Its themes and contributions are interdisciplinary, its orientation pluralistic, its pages open to commentary and debate. Renowned for publishing the best international research and scholarship, Sociological Theory is essential reading for sociologists and social theorists alike.
期刊最新文献
Rights Projects: A Relational Sociology of Rights in Globalization The Entangled Emergencies of COVID-19 Class Experience Mobility through Consumption, Work, and Relationships Relational Durkheim: Homo Duplex as the Foundation of a Formalist Cultural Sociology Stranger in the Mirror: Exploring Somatic Defamiliarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1