North Korea's Marxism-Leninism: Fraternal Criticisms and the Development of North Korean Ideology in the 1960s

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Korean Studies Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1215/21581665-7258081
T. Stock
{"title":"North Korea's Marxism-Leninism: Fraternal Criticisms and the Development of North Korean Ideology in the 1960s","authors":"T. Stock","doi":"10.1215/21581665-7258081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:During the 1960s, as the Sino-Soviet conflict raged on, North Korea, for the first time in its history, officially began to reject the USSR's ideological leadership and instead tread its own path under the slogan of self-reliance. As a result, those forces aligned with the Soviet Union, especially East Germany, heavily criticized North Korea's new ideological path. Drawing on the East German archives, this study seeks to understand the nature of fraternal criticisms and their implications for the development of North Korean ideology in the 1960s. Scholars typically stress North Korean ideology's departure from Marxism-Leninism, sometimes suggesting a departure as early as the 1950s. The present study, based on a thorough reading of archival documents and North Korean materials, challenges such portrayals, arguing that North Korea remained in the Marxist-Leninist tradition even while contesting Soviet orthodoxy. Developments in North Korean ideology were far more gradual than is usually assumed, building on what came before. These developments were by no means revolutionary or removed from the global intellectual environment. The Soviets and East Germans could understand North Korean heterodoxy and engage with it in Marxist-Leninist terms, just as North Korea did with Soviet Marxism-Leninism—there was no fundamental ideological split.","PeriodicalId":43322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/21581665-7258081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:During the 1960s, as the Sino-Soviet conflict raged on, North Korea, for the first time in its history, officially began to reject the USSR's ideological leadership and instead tread its own path under the slogan of self-reliance. As a result, those forces aligned with the Soviet Union, especially East Germany, heavily criticized North Korea's new ideological path. Drawing on the East German archives, this study seeks to understand the nature of fraternal criticisms and their implications for the development of North Korean ideology in the 1960s. Scholars typically stress North Korean ideology's departure from Marxism-Leninism, sometimes suggesting a departure as early as the 1950s. The present study, based on a thorough reading of archival documents and North Korean materials, challenges such portrayals, arguing that North Korea remained in the Marxist-Leninist tradition even while contesting Soviet orthodoxy. Developments in North Korean ideology were far more gradual than is usually assumed, building on what came before. These developments were by no means revolutionary or removed from the global intellectual environment. The Soviets and East Germans could understand North Korean heterodoxy and engage with it in Marxist-Leninist terms, just as North Korea did with Soviet Marxism-Leninism—there was no fundamental ideological split.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
朝鲜的马列主义:兄弟批判与60年代朝鲜意识形态的发展
摘要:20世纪60年代,随着中苏冲突的加剧,朝鲜历史上第一次正式开始拒绝苏联的意识形态领导,而是在自力更生的口号下走上了自己的道路。因此,那些与苏联结盟的势力,特别是东德,严厉批评了朝鲜新的意识形态道路。本研究借鉴东德档案,试图了解兄弟般的批评的性质及其对20世纪60年代朝鲜意识形态发展的影响。学者们通常强调朝鲜意识形态与马克思列宁主义的背离,有时甚至暗示早在20世纪50年代就已经背离了。本研究基于对档案文件和朝鲜材料的彻底阅读,对这种描述提出了质疑,认为朝鲜即使在挑战苏联正统观念的同时,仍保持着马列主义传统。在之前的基础上,朝鲜意识形态的发展比通常想象的要缓慢得多。这些发展决不是革命性的,也不是脱离全球知识环境的。苏联和东德可以理解朝鲜的异端,并以马列主义的术语与之接触,就像朝鲜对待苏联的马列主义一样——没有根本的意识形态分裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note The Diary of 1636: The Second Manchu Invasion of Korea The South Korean Military Ideological Complex: Transcendent Nationalism in Military Moral Education Beyond Double Identity, beyond Periphery: Chinese Ethnic Korean Poetry as Borderland Literature The Checkpoint of History: Testimony and Intertextuality in the Documentary Literature of the Korean War, 1960s–1970s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1