{"title":"Focus on Faculty: A Missing Link in Community–University Partnerships","authors":"J. Ng, Rebecca S. Martínez, Sylvia L. M. Martinez","doi":"10.1080/10474412.2020.1726765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Inherent in the call for this special issue is the idea that Community–University Partnerships (CUPs) matter. In the phrase “community–university partnership,” it is just two entities who are forefronted and assumed to be the primary agents and beneficiaries. Conspicuously absent, however, is recognition of the essential contributions and accompanying career implications for professors who engage Community–University Partnerships (CUPs) as a substantive aspect of their scholarly activities. For many scholars in higher education, their role as consultants bridging the academy and the community is wholly undervalued, and not by the community but by the academy. In this paper, we critically review existing literature about the university professor whose work of envisioning, initiating, developing, and maintaining Community-University Partnerships (CUPs) makes them possible. In particular, we focus on faculty members at traditional research institutions whose merit within the university is determined almost exclusively by their traditional scholarly productivity (i.e., journal publications) and can be diminished by their very engagement in the community. We offer insights into how and why community circumstances and institutional expectations are consequential.","PeriodicalId":46759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","volume":"31 1","pages":"99 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10474412.2020.1726765","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1726765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Inherent in the call for this special issue is the idea that Community–University Partnerships (CUPs) matter. In the phrase “community–university partnership,” it is just two entities who are forefronted and assumed to be the primary agents and beneficiaries. Conspicuously absent, however, is recognition of the essential contributions and accompanying career implications for professors who engage Community–University Partnerships (CUPs) as a substantive aspect of their scholarly activities. For many scholars in higher education, their role as consultants bridging the academy and the community is wholly undervalued, and not by the community but by the academy. In this paper, we critically review existing literature about the university professor whose work of envisioning, initiating, developing, and maintaining Community-University Partnerships (CUPs) makes them possible. In particular, we focus on faculty members at traditional research institutions whose merit within the university is determined almost exclusively by their traditional scholarly productivity (i.e., journal publications) and can be diminished by their very engagement in the community. We offer insights into how and why community circumstances and institutional expectations are consequential.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation (JEPC) provides a forum for improving the scientific understanding of consultation and for describing practical strategies to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of consultation services. Consultation is broadly defined as a process that facilitates problem solving for individuals, groups, and organizations. JEPC publishes articles and special thematic issues that describe formal research, evaluate practice, examine the program implementation process, review relevant literature, investigate systems change, discuss salient issues, and carefully document the translation of theory into practice.