{"title":"Divorce in South Korea: Doing Gender and the Dynamics of Relationship Breakup by Yean-ju Lee (review)","authors":"Caren Freeman","doi":"10.1353/seo.2021.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no doubt that Confucianism still lingers in contemporary Korean society, but its influence is rapidly diminishing amid globalization and the introduction of alternative ways of life—a fact Cawley seems to overlook in favor of asserting its steadfast relevance, particularly regarding the Sewol ferry disaster of 2014 and the subsequent impeachment of then president Park Geun-hye. Furthermore, his focus on the philosophical dimension of Korean religion undermines his analysis of the role of Shamanism, which cannot be fully explained without a thorough consideration of its ritual and practical aspects. This is especially evident in his account of Shamanism in modern-day Korea. Tracing its history up to the modern era, Cawley presents a very optimistic diagnosis of the state of contemporary Shamanism by saying that “the mudang, their rituals and songs continue to be important and show no signs [of] diminishing in modern Korea” (77). However, we must approach this remark with caution, mainly because it is an inaccurate observation of the reality of modern Shamanism. While Shamanism continues to survive today against all odds, its influence is quite clearly in decline. The technological adaptations of the mudang and their increased presence on the Internet, which Cawley refers to as an “evolution” of sorts, are actually a response to this fact—it is a des perate attempt on the part of the mudang to adjust themselves to the changing times and keep their tradition alive in a secularized world that progressively finds less and less need for Shamanistic practices. Cawley’s Religious and Philosophical Traditions of Korea demonstrates just how complex Korean religion is as a subject of academic research. But although there is definite room for improvement, these shortcomings do not take away from the fact that Cawley paints an impressively clear and concise picture of the intellectual history of Korea. Overall, he provides a decent introductory material for easing international readers into the relatively recent, complicated field of Korean religion. As Korean religion forms an integral part of Korean society and culture, I am certain scholars of Korean Studies worldwide will benefit from this book.","PeriodicalId":41678,"journal":{"name":"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/seo.2021.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is no doubt that Confucianism still lingers in contemporary Korean society, but its influence is rapidly diminishing amid globalization and the introduction of alternative ways of life—a fact Cawley seems to overlook in favor of asserting its steadfast relevance, particularly regarding the Sewol ferry disaster of 2014 and the subsequent impeachment of then president Park Geun-hye. Furthermore, his focus on the philosophical dimension of Korean religion undermines his analysis of the role of Shamanism, which cannot be fully explained without a thorough consideration of its ritual and practical aspects. This is especially evident in his account of Shamanism in modern-day Korea. Tracing its history up to the modern era, Cawley presents a very optimistic diagnosis of the state of contemporary Shamanism by saying that “the mudang, their rituals and songs continue to be important and show no signs [of] diminishing in modern Korea” (77). However, we must approach this remark with caution, mainly because it is an inaccurate observation of the reality of modern Shamanism. While Shamanism continues to survive today against all odds, its influence is quite clearly in decline. The technological adaptations of the mudang and their increased presence on the Internet, which Cawley refers to as an “evolution” of sorts, are actually a response to this fact—it is a des perate attempt on the part of the mudang to adjust themselves to the changing times and keep their tradition alive in a secularized world that progressively finds less and less need for Shamanistic practices. Cawley’s Religious and Philosophical Traditions of Korea demonstrates just how complex Korean religion is as a subject of academic research. But although there is definite room for improvement, these shortcomings do not take away from the fact that Cawley paints an impressively clear and concise picture of the intellectual history of Korea. Overall, he provides a decent introductory material for easing international readers into the relatively recent, complicated field of Korean religion. As Korean religion forms an integral part of Korean society and culture, I am certain scholars of Korean Studies worldwide will benefit from this book.
期刊介绍:
Published twice a year under the auspices of the Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies at Seoul National University, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies (SJKS) publishes original, state of the field research on Korea''s past and present. A peer-refereed journal, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies is distributed to institutions and scholars both internationally and domestically. Work published by SJKS comprise in-depth research on established topics as well as new areas of concern, including transnational studies, that reconfigure scholarship devoted to Korean culture, history, literature, religion, and the arts. Unique features of this journal include the explicit aim of providing an English language forum to shape the field of Korean studies both in and outside of Korea. In addition to articles that represent state of the field research, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies publishes an extensive "Book Notes" section that places particular emphasis on introducing the very best in Korean language scholarship to scholars around the world.