Book Review: Ticking clock: Behind the scenes at 60 minutes by Rosen Ira

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Electronic News Pub Date : 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1177/19312431221081843
M. Feldstein
{"title":"Book Review: Ticking clock: Behind the scenes at 60 minutes by Rosen Ira","authors":"M. Feldstein","doi":"10.1177/19312431221081843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1968, CBS News aired the first episode of “60Minutes” and created a new broadcast genre, the television news magazine, which provided more depth than the network’s nightly half-hour newscast, and more variety and pizzaz than the sober hour-long single-issue documentaries of the day. The show introduced entertainment values and multimillion-dollar profits to the once unprofitable news division, prompting other networks to launch a host of imitators that continue to this day. The key to the program’s success was packaging it as the adventures of its star correspondents: Mike Wallace, Morley Safer, Dan Rather, and others. However, behind the scenes, the real journalismwas done by the show’s invisible off-air producers who dug up the show’s stories, scouted field locations, conducted most of the interviews, and often wrote the scripts that the famous correspondents narrated—for far less money than the ballyhooed on-air “talent” was paid. Ira Rosen, one of Wallace’s producers, in his book “Ticking Clock: Behind the Scenes at 60 Minutes” describes the toxic work culture that permeated “60 Minutes.” He writes that the newsroom was filled with screaming, shouting, and humiliating verbal abuse, as well as chronic back-stabbing and stealing of colleagues’ sources and stories. “The tension of the job led...producers to develop heart disease or cancer at an early age,” Rosen writes. “But I endured all the abuse, in part out of fear, but mostly out of ambition” (pp. 24, 4). For Rosen, the power and prestige of working at “60 Minutes” was irresistible—exciting travel, lavish expense accounts, brushing elbows with the famous: “It was like being Superman” (p. 5). The investigative reporting in which Rosen specialized reached an audience of millions and his exposés of crooked politicians, con men, and Mafiosi often produced dramatic results. Rosen describes hunting the bad guys for CBS “like being a spy with a license to kill” (p. 4). (Full disclosure: I occasionally crossed paths with Rosen during my career in television news, though we neither competed nor worked together.) Book Review","PeriodicalId":29929,"journal":{"name":"Electronic News","volume":"16 1","pages":"139 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431221081843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1968, CBS News aired the first episode of “60Minutes” and created a new broadcast genre, the television news magazine, which provided more depth than the network’s nightly half-hour newscast, and more variety and pizzaz than the sober hour-long single-issue documentaries of the day. The show introduced entertainment values and multimillion-dollar profits to the once unprofitable news division, prompting other networks to launch a host of imitators that continue to this day. The key to the program’s success was packaging it as the adventures of its star correspondents: Mike Wallace, Morley Safer, Dan Rather, and others. However, behind the scenes, the real journalismwas done by the show’s invisible off-air producers who dug up the show’s stories, scouted field locations, conducted most of the interviews, and often wrote the scripts that the famous correspondents narrated—for far less money than the ballyhooed on-air “talent” was paid. Ira Rosen, one of Wallace’s producers, in his book “Ticking Clock: Behind the Scenes at 60 Minutes” describes the toxic work culture that permeated “60 Minutes.” He writes that the newsroom was filled with screaming, shouting, and humiliating verbal abuse, as well as chronic back-stabbing and stealing of colleagues’ sources and stories. “The tension of the job led...producers to develop heart disease or cancer at an early age,” Rosen writes. “But I endured all the abuse, in part out of fear, but mostly out of ambition” (pp. 24, 4). For Rosen, the power and prestige of working at “60 Minutes” was irresistible—exciting travel, lavish expense accounts, brushing elbows with the famous: “It was like being Superman” (p. 5). The investigative reporting in which Rosen specialized reached an audience of millions and his exposés of crooked politicians, con men, and Mafiosi often produced dramatic results. Rosen describes hunting the bad guys for CBS “like being a spy with a license to kill” (p. 4). (Full disclosure: I occasionally crossed paths with Rosen during my career in television news, though we neither competed nor worked together.) Book Review
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:《滴答的时钟:60分钟的幕后》,作者:Rosen Ira
1968年,哥伦比亚广播公司新闻频道(CBS News)播出了第一集《60分钟》(60Minutes),并开创了一种新的广播类型——电视新闻杂志,它比该电视台每晚半小时的新闻节目更有深度,比当时严肃的一小时单期纪录片更丰富、更有活力。这个节目为曾经无利可图的新闻部门带来了娱乐价值和数百万美元的利润,促使其他电视台纷纷效仿,一直延续到今天。这个节目成功的关键是把它包装成明星记者的冒险故事:迈克·华莱士、莫利·萨福、丹·拉瑟和其他人。然而,在幕后,真正的新闻报道是由那些看不见的幕后制片人完成的,他们挖掘节目的故事,寻找现场地点,进行大部分采访,经常写剧本,让著名的记者解说——他们的报酬远低于那些被大肆宣传的“天才”。华莱士的制片人之一艾拉·罗森(Ira Rosen)在他的书《滴答的时钟:60分钟的幕后》中描述了弥漫在《60分钟》中的有毒工作文化。他写道,新闻编辑室里充满了尖叫、喊叫和侮辱性的辱骂,还有长期的背后中伤和窃取同事的消息来源和报道。“工作的紧张导致……在年轻时患上心脏病或癌症的可能性更大,”罗森写道。“但我忍受了所有的虐待,部分是出于恐惧,但主要是出于野心”(第24、4页)。对罗森来说,在《60分钟》工作的权力和声望是不可抗拒的——令人兴奋的旅行、奢侈的报销账单、与名人的亲密接触:“就像成为超人一样”(第5页)。罗森专门从事的调查报道吸引了数百万观众,他对不诚实的政客、骗子和黑手党的揭露经常产生戏剧性的结果。罗森形容为哥伦比亚广播公司追捕坏人“就像一个有杀人执照的间谍”(第4页)。(完全披露:在我从事电视新闻工作期间,我偶尔会与罗森相遇,尽管我们既没有竞争,也没有合作。)书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic News
Electronic News COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Does Tribe Trump Facts? Novel Measures of Hostile Media The Social Media Comment Section as an Unruly Public Arena: How Comment Reading Erodes Trust in News Media Innovation and Determination: How Local American TV Journalists Told the COVID-19 “Story of a Lifetime” “Standard” Appearance and “Accentless” Speech: How Performance Neutrality Limits Diversity in Broadcast News Attitudes of U.S. Public Broadcasters: A Liberal Helping of Interpretive Journalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1