Extinción de Dominio en México: Revisión de su estructura constitucional y convencional

Francisco José Parra Lara
{"title":"Extinción de Dominio en México: Revisión de su estructura constitucional y convencional","authors":"Francisco José Parra Lara","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mexican constitutional theory has generally mentioned the public order and benefit as the groundwork for the State's assets recovering considered as illegal. What has changed over time are the different hypothesis in which state appropriation can be enforced, some of them go from considering state appropriation as a punishment, authority, right to a faculty. Today the asset recovery, by constitutional mandate, is considered a civil and autonomous act nature through by all means the State must become the possessor of all assets  whose legitimate origin cannot be proven . This by all means is a figure whose origin and constitutional proceedings becomes controversial.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":"6 1","pages":"667-700"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mexican constitutional theory has generally mentioned the public order and benefit as the groundwork for the State's assets recovering considered as illegal. What has changed over time are the different hypothesis in which state appropriation can be enforced, some of them go from considering state appropriation as a punishment, authority, right to a faculty. Today the asset recovery, by constitutional mandate, is considered a civil and autonomous act nature through by all means the State must become the possessor of all assets  whose legitimate origin cannot be proven . This by all means is a figure whose origin and constitutional proceedings becomes controversial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥统治权的消亡:对其宪法和常规结构的审查
墨西哥宪法理论一般提到公共秩序和利益是追回被视为非法的国家资产的基础。随着时间的推移,不同的假设发生了变化国家拨款可以被强制执行,其中一些人将国家拨款视为一种惩罚,权威,权利到一种能力。今天,根据宪法规定,资产追回被认为是一种民事和自主行为性质,国家必须通过一切手段成为其合法来源无法证明的所有资产的所有者。无论如何,这个人物的出身和宪法程序都是有争议的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
66.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Legalidade “versus” jurisdicionalidade na execução penal? Ônus financeiro da monitoração eletrônica em decisões do TRF-4 Deciding not to decide Intersecções entre o Eficientismo Processual Penal e o Neoliberalismo Desnaturalización del doble conforme y desbordamiento de carga procesal en el Perú a propósito de la Ley N° 31592, ley que modifica la condena del absuelto Balancing Self-Incrimination and Public Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Compelled Smartphone Unlocking in Brazilian and U.S. Legal Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1