Pub Date : 2024-05-15DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.956
Sérgio Bruno Araújo Rebouças, Ana Beatriz Barros de Siqueira
This article problematizes the reparation of damage as a condition of the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) in crimes against Brazilian tax system. The applicability of this condition is addressed in crimes where the full reparation of the damage (payment of the tax) already has the effect of extinguishing criminal liability. This research is intended to answer the following problems: (i) Is the NPA applicable in tax crimes? (ii) Must the reparation of the damage, as a condition of the NPA, cover the full value of the tax, including interests and fines? (iii) Is the reparation of the damage always necessary to sign a NPA? The expectation of advantage to the accused, provided by the agreement as a negotiated justice instrument, is considered as a condition of its own meaning and effectiveness. On the other hand, the expectation of protection of the legal interest is considered in light of the sufficiency of the agreement as an instrument of prevention and repression of tax crimes. Possible ways of reconciling these expectations are delimited as hypotheses, through solutions such as a restricted understanding of the reparation of damage and the viability of partial reparation. The research is qualitative, exploratory, and propositional, based on the analysis of specialized legislation and literature.
{"title":"Reparation as a condition of the non-prosecution agreement in crimes against the tax system","authors":"Sérgio Bruno Araújo Rebouças, Ana Beatriz Barros de Siqueira","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.956","url":null,"abstract":"This article problematizes the reparation of damage as a condition of the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) in crimes against Brazilian tax system. The applicability of this condition is addressed in crimes where the full reparation of the damage (payment of the tax) already has the effect of extinguishing criminal liability. This research is intended to answer the following problems: (i) Is the NPA applicable in tax crimes? (ii) Must the reparation of the damage, as a condition of the NPA, cover the full value of the tax, including interests and fines? (iii) Is the reparation of the damage always necessary to sign a NPA? The expectation of advantage to the accused, provided by the agreement as a negotiated justice instrument, is considered as a condition of its own meaning and effectiveness. On the other hand, the expectation of protection of the legal interest is considered in light of the sufficiency of the agreement as an instrument of prevention and repression of tax crimes. Possible ways of reconciling these expectations are delimited as hypotheses, through solutions such as a restricted understanding of the reparation of damage and the viability of partial reparation. The research is qualitative, exploratory, and propositional, based on the analysis of specialized legislation and literature. ","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140974700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-15DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.910
Alejandra Castillo Ara
The aim of this paper is to highlight the need to establish a specialised justice system for vulnerable groups. The Chilean experience in this area is used as a reference point. Questions are raised as to which groups deserve special attention and how specialisation can be achieved without compromising the neutrality of the law, which also aims at universality, at least at the local level. The idea that this differentiated consideration is a necessity is addressed, and its basis is essentially based on two things: an understanding of the right of access to justice as an autonomous right, and the principle of relative equality as material equality. Although it does not deal with practical implementation, it offers indicative guidelines that would allow for the optimisation of procedural and substantive legal instruments, thereby improving access to justice for vulnerable groups. In order to outline the path towards specialisation, key issues such as the definition of vulnerable groups and the debate on whether a procedural solution is sufficient or whether a correction of substantive criminal law is necessary are addressed. Finally, it discusses the insufficiency of a purely administrative solution and the feasibility of judicial specialisation, considering the possibility that the neutrality and objectivity of criminal law and criminal procedure may ultimately be violated. Finally, the question is raised as to whether specialised justice is a more empathetic than legal solution, which tends to undermine social solutions over individual ones.
{"title":"Specialised justice as a path between the universal and the particular in the light of the Chilean case","authors":"Alejandra Castillo Ara","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.910","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to highlight the need to establish a specialised justice system for vulnerable groups. The Chilean experience in this area is used as a reference point. Questions are raised as to which groups deserve special attention and how specialisation can be achieved without compromising the neutrality of the law, which also aims at universality, at least at the local level. The idea that this differentiated consideration is a necessity is addressed, and its basis is essentially based on two things: an understanding of the right of access to justice as an autonomous right, and the principle of relative equality as material equality. Although it does not deal with practical implementation, it offers indicative guidelines that would allow for the optimisation of procedural and substantive legal instruments, thereby improving access to justice for vulnerable groups. In order to outline the path towards specialisation, key issues such as the definition of vulnerable groups and the debate on whether a procedural solution is sufficient or whether a correction of substantive criminal law is necessary are addressed. Finally, it discusses the insufficiency of a purely administrative solution and the feasibility of judicial specialisation, considering the possibility that the neutrality and objectivity of criminal law and criminal procedure may ultimately be violated. Finally, the question is raised as to whether specialised justice is a more empathetic than legal solution, which tends to undermine social solutions over individual ones.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140977620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-15DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.924
Rámon Beltrán Calfurrapa
The purpose of this article is to examine the defects of the statement of reasons and its influence as a source of miscarriage of justice in contemporary criminal proceedings. To achieve this, in addition to identifying the main manifestations and typologies of these defects, it seeks to clarify how and in what way various inconsistencies in the fulfillment of the duty to state the reasons contribute to reinforce the judicial error and, consequently, to issue wrongful convictions to the detriment of innocent people. In this way, in the interest of answering questions such as what are the defects of the state reasons for judgments? what are its most characteristic features? and how do they materialize in the configuration of judicial error? the article concludes by proposing a series of criteria that could contribute to controlling the risk of error in this context.
{"title":"Os vícios de motivação como causa do erro judiciário: um primeiro esboço","authors":"Rámon Beltrán Calfurrapa","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.924","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to examine the defects of the statement of reasons and its influence as a source of miscarriage of justice in contemporary criminal proceedings. To achieve this, in addition to identifying the main manifestations and typologies of these defects, it seeks to clarify how and in what way various inconsistencies in the fulfillment of the duty to state the reasons contribute to reinforce the judicial error and, consequently, to issue wrongful convictions to the detriment of innocent people. In this way, in the interest of answering questions such as what are the defects of the state reasons for judgments? what are its most characteristic features? and how do they materialize in the configuration of judicial error? the article concludes by proposing a series of criteria that could contribute to controlling the risk of error in this context.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140973819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-15DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.931
Gisele Mara de Oliveira, Samia Saad Gallotti Bonavides, Luiz Gustavo Giuriatto Ferraço
The article deals with the preclusion on the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings, in order to answer the following research problem: how can preclusion affect the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings? As a hypothesis, it was established that the principle of the presumption of innocence and the right to a broad defense can rule out the rules of preclusion applicable to the evidentiary activity carried out by the accused in criminal proceedings. The research was carried out in three stages, based on the constitutional and infra-constitutional rules applicable to the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings. Firstly, the study dealt with the preclusion in relation to the right to evidence. Secondly, it described the possible hypotheses of preclusion related to the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings. Finally, it sought to verify the possibility of preclusion occurring in criminal proceedings and in relation to the probative activity of the accused. Adopting the guidelines of the hypothetical-deductive method and explanatory approach, and based on the theoretical knowledge already published about the subject, the research led to the conclusion that the principle of the presumption of innocence and the right to a broad defense point to the inapplicability of preclusion in relation to the evidential activity carried out by the accused in criminal proceedings.
{"title":"Reflections about the preclusion of the right to prove in Brazilian criminal procedure","authors":"Gisele Mara de Oliveira, Samia Saad Gallotti Bonavides, Luiz Gustavo Giuriatto Ferraço","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.931","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.931","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the preclusion on the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings, in order to answer the following research problem: how can preclusion affect the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings? As a hypothesis, it was established that the principle of the presumption of innocence and the right to a broad defense can rule out the rules of preclusion applicable to the evidentiary activity carried out by the accused in criminal proceedings. The research was carried out in three stages, based on the constitutional and infra-constitutional rules applicable to the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings. Firstly, the study dealt with the preclusion in relation to the right to evidence. Secondly, it described the possible hypotheses of preclusion related to the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings. Finally, it sought to verify the possibility of preclusion occurring in criminal proceedings and in relation to the probative activity of the accused. Adopting the guidelines of the hypothetical-deductive method and explanatory approach, and based on the theoretical knowledge already published about the subject, the research led to the conclusion that the principle of the presumption of innocence and the right to a broad defense point to the inapplicability of preclusion in relation to the evidential activity carried out by the accused in criminal proceedings.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140971975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-15DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.959
P. Bronzo, Bruno Cunha Souza
With the judgment of ADIs nº. 6,298, 6,299, 6,300 and 6,305, by the STF’s Plenary, a clear resistance was expressed to a criminal process marked by accusatory characteristics in Brazil. Given the historical-legislative affinity of the Brazilian criminal process with Italy and the fact that the reform to the Italian accusatory model presented issues similar to those raised in the aforementioned judgment, gains relevance understanding how the judge, the parties and the evidence articulate themselves on the current Italian model. To this end, through the analysis of the Italian positive law faced with doctrinal perspectives on the pertinent topics, the relationships between the organization of the proof initiative and dispositive principle, “double acts”, free conviction of the judge, impartiality of the judge, procedural contradiction and agreements on the content of the procedural records are described.
{"title":"Il giudice, le parti e la prova nel sistema di giudizio penale italiano: contributo alla riforma in Brasile","authors":"P. Bronzo, Bruno Cunha Souza","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.959","url":null,"abstract":"With the judgment of ADIs nº. 6,298, 6,299, 6,300 and 6,305, by the STF’s Plenary, a clear resistance was expressed to a criminal process marked by accusatory characteristics in Brazil. Given the historical-legislative affinity of the Brazilian criminal process with Italy and the fact that the reform to the Italian accusatory model presented issues similar to those raised in the aforementioned judgment, gains relevance understanding how the judge, the parties and the evidence articulate themselves on the current Italian model. To this end, through the analysis of the Italian positive law faced with doctrinal perspectives on the pertinent topics, the relationships between the organization of the proof initiative and dispositive principle, “double acts”, free conviction of the judge, impartiality of the judge, procedural contradiction and agreements on the content of the procedural records are described.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140977164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The right against self-incrimination plays an essential role in the construction of an accusatorial criminal procedure system that legitimizes the jus puniendi. With the rise of models of criminal liability for legal entities in various jurisdictions, could this right be conferred upon them? What would be its scope in this perspective? This article, through bibliographic review and deductive theoretical method, first examines the extension of fundamental rights to legal entities. Subsequently, the focus turns specifically to the right against self-incrimination, investigating its foundations and nature. Based on this, the article examines relevant jurisprudence in the European Union regarding the right against self-incrimination, identifies key perspectives and divergences in its application to legal entities, ultimately providing considerations on the scope of this right in this context.
{"title":"The privilege against self-incrimination by legal entities in criminal procedures","authors":"Pedro Augusto Amaral Dassan","doi":"10.22197/f2739b20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/f2739b20","url":null,"abstract":"The right against self-incrimination plays an essential role in the construction of an accusatorial criminal procedure system that legitimizes the jus puniendi. With the rise of models of criminal liability for legal entities in various jurisdictions, could this right be conferred upon them? What would be its scope in this perspective? This article, through bibliographic review and deductive theoretical method, first examines the extension of fundamental rights to legal entities. Subsequently, the focus turns specifically to the right against self-incrimination, investigating its foundations and nature. Based on this, the article examines relevant jurisprudence in the European Union regarding the right against self-incrimination, identifies key perspectives and divergences in its application to legal entities, ultimately providing considerations on the scope of this right in this context.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140375107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.945
G. I. Anitua, Mariano Sicardi
This paper proposes to give the kick to discuss a legal theory about using plea bargaining in Latin America. First of all, we do a review of the different research that legal and sociolegal scholars conducted on this phenomenon. Then, we describe the risk of plea bargaining in the US criminal justice system based on the recent report by the American Bar Association and ask: Can something similar be thought of for our country? Finally, and after pointing out some hypotheses for future work, we conclude the necessity of building a theory on plea bargaining to establish deontological and legal limits in its use.
{"title":"Towards a plea-bargaining theory: Need to impose legal and deontological limits for its use","authors":"G. I. Anitua, Mariano Sicardi","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.945","url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes to give the kick to discuss a legal theory about using plea bargaining in Latin America. First of all, we do a review of the different research that legal and sociolegal scholars conducted on this phenomenon. Then, we describe the risk of plea bargaining in the US criminal justice system based on the recent report by the American Bar Association and ask: Can something similar be thought of for our country? Finally, and after pointing out some hypotheses for future work, we conclude the necessity of building a theory on plea bargaining to establish deontological and legal limits in its use.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140376900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article justifies a standard of proof for crimes against humanity. In order to achieve that objective, this investigation is divided into three parts. Firstly, it reflects the absence of an exhaustive explanation that justifies the application of a standard of proof in transitional justice. Secondly, it adopts an alternative procedural model as a method to set a flexible standard of proof, different from these used in criminal trials. Thirdly, it designs the argument of procedural asymmetries to expose two central aspects: the unjustified disadvantage suffered by the victim of crimes against humanity and the limitations of the legal sanction imposed for these crimes. Lastly, the article concludes that the application of a differentiated standard of proof is only possible in exceptional cases, such as those trials associated with serious human rights violations.
{"title":"El estándar de suficiencia probatoria para crímenes de lesa humanidad","authors":"Gustavo Poblete","doi":"10.22197/hp3yav79","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/hp3yav79","url":null,"abstract":"The article justifies a standard of proof for crimes against humanity. In order to achieve that objective, this investigation is divided into three parts. Firstly, it reflects the absence of an exhaustive explanation that justifies the application of a standard of proof in transitional justice. Secondly, it adopts an alternative procedural model as a method to set a flexible standard of proof, different from these used in criminal trials. Thirdly, it designs the argument of procedural asymmetries to expose two central aspects: the unjustified disadvantage suffered by the victim of crimes against humanity and the limitations of the legal sanction imposed for these crimes. Lastly, the article concludes that the application of a differentiated standard of proof is only possible in exceptional cases, such as those trials associated with serious human rights violations.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140245301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
With the introduction of the Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement in the criminal procedural law by L. 13.964, of 2019, the criminal consensual justice system now has yet another important institute. Although initially provided for in CNMP Resolution n. 181, of 2017, its legal provision permanently removed the criticisms directed at its implementation through an infralegal act. In addition to exploring the legal nature of the ANPP, the possibility of its application in various crimes, its relationship with the constitutional right to silence, as well as the need for the Investigated to know the evidence produced against him to better evaluate the proposed agreement, the study analyzes the extrajudicial confession as an essential requirement for its celebration and approval by the Judiciary, including the exposition of the understandings of the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice that are formed on the subject. In the end, in view of the researched precedents, we seek to answer the following questions: do the STF and the STJ require certain requirements to validate the extrajudicial confession? Do you understand that judicial appreciation is relevant?
{"title":"Acordo de Não Persecução Penal (ANPP): aspectos gerais e observações sobre a confissão extrajudicial","authors":"Rogerio Schietti Cruz, Eduardo Martins Neiva Monteiro","doi":"10.22197/tf0g7z22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/tf0g7z22","url":null,"abstract":"With the introduction of the Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement in the criminal procedural law by L. 13.964, of 2019, the criminal consensual justice system now has yet another important institute. Although initially provided for in CNMP Resolution n. 181, of 2017, its legal provision permanently removed the criticisms directed at its implementation through an infralegal act. In addition to exploring the legal nature of the ANPP, the possibility of its application in various crimes, its relationship with the constitutional right to silence, as well as the need for the Investigated to know the evidence produced against him to better evaluate the proposed agreement, the study analyzes the extrajudicial confession as an essential requirement for its celebration and approval by the Judiciary, including the exposition of the understandings of the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice that are formed on the subject. In the end, in view of the researched precedents, we seek to answer the following questions: do the STF and the STJ require certain requirements to validate the extrajudicial confession? Do you understand that judicial appreciation is relevant?","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140245857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gabriel Antinolfi Divan, Nestor Eduardo Araruna Santiago
The paper, based on a bibliographic and hermeneutic review with a deductive approach, presents the configuration of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (ANPP) as a political-criminal instrument, the foundations of which need to be understood. Against the backdrop of the discussion of these foundations as binding by the Supreme Federal Court (STF), the first part advocates for the maximum scope and retroactivity of the ANPP as a mixed norm, seeking to describe the state of the discussion and the bases of the debate in jurisprudence. In a second moment, it proposes that the concept of penal insignificance, present in the legal discipline of the ANPP, should gain prominence as a critical function linked to the political-criminal analysis of jurisdictional action. In the third section, the text asserts the urgency of a justification for filtering the necessity or not of penal incidence and its convenience, based on perspectives on what may constitute just cause for criminal action. In the concluding remarks, the paper revisits the potential role of ANPP as an instrument that could inaugurate a democratic renewal in the legal system, given its ability to pave the way for a strategic discussion regarding the necessity or not of state-punitive action.
{"title":"Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement as a political-criminal instrument: possibilities, binding jurisprudential reconfigurations, and the new directions of the Brazilian criminal procedure","authors":"Gabriel Antinolfi Divan, Nestor Eduardo Araruna Santiago","doi":"10.22197/8xdex803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22197/8xdex803","url":null,"abstract":"The paper, based on a bibliographic and hermeneutic review with a deductive approach, presents the configuration of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (ANPP) as a political-criminal instrument, the foundations of which need to be understood. Against the backdrop of the discussion of these foundations as binding by the Supreme Federal Court (STF), the first part advocates for the maximum scope and retroactivity of the ANPP as a mixed norm, seeking to describe the state of the discussion and the bases of the debate in jurisprudence. In a second moment, it proposes that the concept of penal insignificance, present in the legal discipline of the ANPP, should gain prominence as a critical function linked to the political-criminal analysis of jurisdictional action. In the third section, the text asserts the urgency of a justification for filtering the necessity or not of penal incidence and its convenience, based on perspectives on what may constitute just cause for criminal action. In the concluding remarks, the paper revisits the potential role of ANPP as an instrument that could inaugurate a democratic renewal in the legal system, given its ability to pave the way for a strategic discussion regarding the necessity or not of state-punitive action.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140246901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：