The role of context-specific factors in IFDI’s influence on OFDI of developing country: Evidence from China

Mengting Zhang, Chang-biao Zhong, Feng Yu
{"title":"The role of context-specific factors in IFDI’s influence on OFDI of developing country: Evidence from China","authors":"Mengting Zhang, Chang-biao Zhong, Feng Yu","doi":"10.1108/JCEFTS-03-2017-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nAlthough prior research has highlighted the importance of foreign direct investment (FDI) on a country’s internationalization, it has largely focused on developed countries. As a result, the FDI performance of a developing country, which differs fundamentally from that of developed countries in their environment, remains unclear. Under the newly development environment, the traditional FDI theories have been challenged by the increasing investments from emerging and transition economies. The theory system needs a fresh situation’s supplement urgently. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nOn the basis of a literature review, this paper constructed an empirical model to further study the moderating effects of context-specific factors on the influence of inbound foreign direct investment (IFDI) on outbound foreign direct investment (OFDI). China was chosen as the representation of a developing country, and its data of mutual investments with 125 countries from 2003 to 2014 were used to carry out hypothesis testing. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe analysis and results of this paper suggested: first, for China, the overall influence of IFDI on OFDI is positive. That is to say, IFDI’s positive spillover effect is greater than the negative competition effect. Second, innovational distance’s effect on FDI is complicated. It can either be positive or negative, which calls for further investigation. Third, economic distance negatively affects OFDI and negatively moderates IFDI’s effect on OFDI, especially the export. To some extent, the moderating effect that resulted from the competition effect will reduce overseas investment by extruding some of the local enterprises. Fourth, cultural distance’s effect is closely related to the spillover effect that will positively moderate IFDI’s influence on OFDI. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis paper enriched the international investment theoretical system by adding a mechanism of multiway international investment of a developing country. The research also has a guiding significance for developing countries’ governments in coordinating mutual international investments. Also, these results have important implications for how policymakers promote OFDI and put forward new theoretical avenues for conceptualizing the internationalization process.","PeriodicalId":44245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"172-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JCEFTS-03-2017-0008","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCEFTS-03-2017-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Although prior research has highlighted the importance of foreign direct investment (FDI) on a country’s internationalization, it has largely focused on developed countries. As a result, the FDI performance of a developing country, which differs fundamentally from that of developed countries in their environment, remains unclear. Under the newly development environment, the traditional FDI theories have been challenged by the increasing investments from emerging and transition economies. The theory system needs a fresh situation’s supplement urgently. Design/methodology/approach On the basis of a literature review, this paper constructed an empirical model to further study the moderating effects of context-specific factors on the influence of inbound foreign direct investment (IFDI) on outbound foreign direct investment (OFDI). China was chosen as the representation of a developing country, and its data of mutual investments with 125 countries from 2003 to 2014 were used to carry out hypothesis testing. Findings The analysis and results of this paper suggested: first, for China, the overall influence of IFDI on OFDI is positive. That is to say, IFDI’s positive spillover effect is greater than the negative competition effect. Second, innovational distance’s effect on FDI is complicated. It can either be positive or negative, which calls for further investigation. Third, economic distance negatively affects OFDI and negatively moderates IFDI’s effect on OFDI, especially the export. To some extent, the moderating effect that resulted from the competition effect will reduce overseas investment by extruding some of the local enterprises. Fourth, cultural distance’s effect is closely related to the spillover effect that will positively moderate IFDI’s influence on OFDI. Originality/value This paper enriched the international investment theoretical system by adding a mechanism of multiway international investment of a developing country. The research also has a guiding significance for developing countries’ governments in coordinating mutual international investments. Also, these results have important implications for how policymakers promote OFDI and put forward new theoretical avenues for conceptualizing the internationalization process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际单项体育联合会对发展中国家对外直接投资影响的情境因素:来自中国的证据
目的尽管先前的研究强调了外国直接投资对一个国家国际化的重要性,但它主要集中在发达国家。因此,发展中国家的外国直接投资表现与发达国家的环境有根本不同,但仍不清楚。在新的发展环境下,新兴经济体和转型经济体不断增加的投资对传统的FDI理论提出了挑战。这一理论体系急需一个新形势的补充。设计/方法论/方法在文献综述的基础上,本文构建了一个实证模型,进一步研究特定情境因素对入境外国直接投资(IFDI)对出境外国直接投资影响的调节作用。选择中国作为发展中国家的代表,利用其2003年至2014年与125个国家的共同投资数据进行假设检验。研究结果本文的分析和结果表明:首先,对中国来说,对外直接投资对对外直接投资的总体影响是积极的。也就是说,IFDI的正向溢出效应大于负向竞争效应。第二,创新距离对FDI的影响是复杂的。它可以是积极的,也可以是消极的,这需要进一步的调查。第三,经济距离对对外直接投资产生负面影响,并对国际单项体育联合会对外直接投资,特别是出口的影响产生负面影响。在某种程度上,竞争效应产生的调节效应会通过挤压一些本土企业来减少海外投资。第四,文化距离效应与溢出效应密切相关,溢出效应将正向调节国际直接投资对对外直接投资的影响。创新/价值本文通过增加发展中国家的多边国际投资机制,丰富了国际投资理论体系。该研究对发展中国家政府协调国际投资也具有指导意义。此外,这些结果对政策制定者如何促进对外直接投资具有重要意义,并为国际化进程的概念化提出了新的理论途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies (JCEFTS) negotiates China''s unique position within the international economy, and its interaction across the globe. From a truly international perspective, the journal publishes both qualitative and quantitative research in all areas of Chinese business and foreign trade, technical economics, business environment and business strategy. JCEFTS publishes high quality research papers, viewpoints, conceptual papers, case studies, literature reviews and general views. Emphasis is placed on the publication of articles which seek to link theory with application, or critically analyse real situations in terms of Chinese economics and business in China, with the objective of identifying good practice in these areas and assisting in the development of more appropriate arrangements for addressing crucial issues of Chinese economics and business. Papers accepted for publication will be double–blind peer-reviewed to ensure academic rigour and integrity.
期刊最新文献
Digital financial inclusion and inclusive development in lower-middle-income countries: the enabling role of institutional quality COVID-19 pandemic and linkage between stock markets in Middle Eastern countries Impact of factory certifications on firm resources: a quantitative content analysis of the Bangladeshi readymade garments (RMG) industry Corporate cash holding and firm’s performance in times of Ukraine war: a literature review and way forward Beyond the seams: evaluating competitiveness and comparative advantage in Vietnam’s apparel industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1