The Role of Using Formative Assessments in Problem-based Learning: A Health Sciences Education Perspective

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning Pub Date : 2019-08-30 DOI:10.7771/1541-5015.1814
Kristi Kelley, Julaine Fowlin, A. Tawfik, Max C. Anderson
{"title":"The Role of Using Formative Assessments in Problem-based Learning: A Health Sciences Education Perspective","authors":"Kristi Kelley, Julaine Fowlin, A. Tawfik, Max C. Anderson","doi":"10.7771/1541-5015.1814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practitioners in the field of pharmacy are often confronted with ill-structured problems. Specifically, pharmacists are tasked with making patient-specific recommendations that are both safe and effective, which requires combining knowledge from the biomedical, behavioral, and pharmaceutical sciences. Given the dynamic nature of pharmacy as a profession, the field has begun to explore learning strategies that go beyond mere content coverage to strategies that better support higher-order learning outcomes. One of these approaches is problem-based learning (PBL). While studies have focused on how to support PBL to improve learning outcomes, the role of assessment is often overlooked. Further exploration is thus needed since assessment plays a pivotal role in teaching and learning. This Voices paper will explore this idea within a larger context; we will also share the experience of how a subject matter expert (SME) worked with a team of instructional designers (IDs) to revise an existing course to more explicitly employ PBL and thus adopt an inquiry-based mindset needed for complex clinical decision making. Given the inherent challenges of assessment in PBL, further discussion will be focused on how to (a) design ill-structured problems, (b) align assessments to the PBL curriculum, and (c) how to hold students accountable in cases where a traditional grade is not attached.","PeriodicalId":46380,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Practitioners in the field of pharmacy are often confronted with ill-structured problems. Specifically, pharmacists are tasked with making patient-specific recommendations that are both safe and effective, which requires combining knowledge from the biomedical, behavioral, and pharmaceutical sciences. Given the dynamic nature of pharmacy as a profession, the field has begun to explore learning strategies that go beyond mere content coverage to strategies that better support higher-order learning outcomes. One of these approaches is problem-based learning (PBL). While studies have focused on how to support PBL to improve learning outcomes, the role of assessment is often overlooked. Further exploration is thus needed since assessment plays a pivotal role in teaching and learning. This Voices paper will explore this idea within a larger context; we will also share the experience of how a subject matter expert (SME) worked with a team of instructional designers (IDs) to revise an existing course to more explicitly employ PBL and thus adopt an inquiry-based mindset needed for complex clinical decision making. Given the inherent challenges of assessment in PBL, further discussion will be focused on how to (a) design ill-structured problems, (b) align assessments to the PBL curriculum, and (c) how to hold students accountable in cases where a traditional grade is not attached.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从健康科学教育的角度看形成性评估在问题学习中的作用
药学领域的从业者经常面临结构不良的问题。具体来说,药剂师的任务是提出安全有效的针对患者的建议,这需要结合生物医学、行为学和药学的知识。鉴于药学作为一种职业的动态性,该领域已经开始探索超越单纯内容覆盖范围的学习策略,以更好地支持高阶学习成果的策略。其中一种方法是基于问题的学习(PBL)。虽然研究的重点是如何支持PBL以提高学习成果,但评估的作用往往被忽视。由于评估在教学中起着关键作用,因此需要进一步探索。《声音》的这篇论文将在更大的背景下探讨这一想法;我们还将分享主题专家(SME)如何与教学设计师团队(ID)合作修改现有课程以更明确地使用PBL的经验,从而采用复杂临床决策所需的基于探究的思维方式。鉴于PBL评估的固有挑战,进一步的讨论将集中在如何(a)设计结构不良的问题,(b)使评估与PBL课程相一致,以及(c)在没有附加传统成绩的情况下,如何让学生承担责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning
Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning (IJPBL) will be a global outlet for PBL scholarship, representing excellence in discovery and promoting transformative educational pedagogy. IJPBL will provide access to the most current research and practice related to PBL pedagogy, thus enhancing efforts of both PBL scholars and practitioners. The mission of IJPBL is to Publish rigorous research, representing a variety of disciplines, related to problem-based learning Engage key and emerging scholars in significant discussion of key issues facing PBL researchers and practitioners Provide up-to-date information to scholars and practitioners who are new to PBL research and pedagogy, enabling them to address current gaps in the literature and/or to transform current learning environments and practices.
期刊最新文献
Introduction to Special Issue “Research Methodologies for Studying Problem-based and Project-based Learning Problem-based Learning, a Tool to Develop Critical Thinking Skills of Undergraduate Veterinary Students Design and Implementation of a Problem-Based Learning Module in a Clinical Radiography Course to Foster Image Critique Skills: An Evaluative Case Study Networks Supporting Problem-Based Invention Education Impact of The NTN Design on Academic Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1