Physiological arousal variability accompanying relations-oriented behaviors of effective leaders: Triangulating skin conductance, video-based behavior coding and perceived effectiveness

IF 9.1 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Leadership Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101493
Marcella A.M.G. Hoogeboom , Aaqib Saeed , Matthijs L. Noordzij , Celeste P.M. Wilderom
{"title":"Physiological arousal variability accompanying relations-oriented behaviors of effective leaders: Triangulating skin conductance, video-based behavior coding and perceived effectiveness","authors":"Marcella A.M.G. Hoogeboom ,&nbsp;Aaqib Saeed ,&nbsp;Matthijs L. Noordzij ,&nbsp;Celeste P.M. Wilderom","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>With the aim of extending the healthy physiological variability thesis to Leadership Studies, we examined the hypothesized links among leaders' within-person variability in physiological arousal, their task- and relations-oriented behaviors and their overall effectiveness. During regularly-held staff meetings, wristband skin sensors and video cameras captured synchronized physiological and fine-grained behavioral data of 36 leaders within one organization. Perceived leader effectiveness ratings were obtained from their followers. Multi-level log-linear analyses showed no elevated levels of arousal during the task-oriented behaviors of both the highly effective and the less effective leaders. The highly effective leaders showed a significantly greater likelihood of high levels of physiological arousal during positive and negative relations-oriented behaviors. We thus report a physiological correlate of relations-oriented leader behavior; especially among the most effective leaders, higher levels of arousal co-occurred with their positive and negative relations-oriented behavior in the meetings. Having used two high-resolution methods to advance insights about effective organizational leadership, this field study illuminates the importance of capturing the co-occurrence of within-person variability in leaders' bodily responses and their precisely measured behaviors over time in a functional </span>social setting at work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"32 6","pages":"Article 101493"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101493","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104898432030120X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

With the aim of extending the healthy physiological variability thesis to Leadership Studies, we examined the hypothesized links among leaders' within-person variability in physiological arousal, their task- and relations-oriented behaviors and their overall effectiveness. During regularly-held staff meetings, wristband skin sensors and video cameras captured synchronized physiological and fine-grained behavioral data of 36 leaders within one organization. Perceived leader effectiveness ratings were obtained from their followers. Multi-level log-linear analyses showed no elevated levels of arousal during the task-oriented behaviors of both the highly effective and the less effective leaders. The highly effective leaders showed a significantly greater likelihood of high levels of physiological arousal during positive and negative relations-oriented behaviors. We thus report a physiological correlate of relations-oriented leader behavior; especially among the most effective leaders, higher levels of arousal co-occurred with their positive and negative relations-oriented behavior in the meetings. Having used two high-resolution methods to advance insights about effective organizational leadership, this field study illuminates the importance of capturing the co-occurrence of within-person variability in leaders' bodily responses and their precisely measured behaviors over time in a functional social setting at work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效领导者关系导向行为的生理唤醒变异性:皮肤电导三角测量、基于视频的行为编码和感知有效性
为了将健康的生理变异理论扩展到领导力研究中,我们研究了领导者在生理唤醒方面的个人变异、他们的任务导向和关系导向行为以及他们的整体有效性之间的假设联系。在定期召开的员工会议上,腕带皮肤传感器和摄像机捕捉到一个组织内36位领导者的同步生理和细粒度行为数据。感知领导者的有效性评级是从他们的追随者那里获得的。多层级对数线性分析显示,高效率和低效率领导在任务导向行为时的唤醒水平均未升高。在积极和消极的关系导向行为中,高效领导表现出更高水平的生理唤醒的可能性。因此,我们报告了关系导向的领导行为的生理关联;尤其是在最高效的领导者中,更高水平的激励与他们在会议中积极和消极的关系导向行为同时发生。通过使用两种高分辨率的方法来深入了解有效的组织领导力,该实地研究阐明了在工作的功能性社会环境中,捕捉领导者身体反应和他们精确测量的行为随时间变化的共同发生的个人变异性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Effects of women on corporate boards: An integrative review from a political capital perspective The business case for demographic diversity in strategic leadership teams: A systematic and critical review of the causal evidence Effect size benchmarks: Time for a causal renaissance Building foundations for explanatory theory and causally trustworthy evidence-based leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1