Metas de aprendizaje y rasgos de personalidad como predictores del bienestar en cadetes de una institución policial

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicodebate-Psicologia Cultura y Sociedad Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.18682/pd.v19i2.910
L. Nieri, Ivan Fritzler
{"title":"Metas de aprendizaje y rasgos de personalidad como predictores del bienestar en cadetes de una institución policial","authors":"L. Nieri, Ivan Fritzler","doi":"10.18682/pd.v19i2.910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to investigate whether academic motivation and personality traits predict the welfare of police cadets, while analyzing differences in well-being according to sex and age. The sample consisted of 411 cadets with an average age of 24.08 years (SD = 3.18) belonging to a state police institution. The instruments used were BFI (Big Five Inventory), EMA – M (Learning Goal Scale), MHC– SF (Mental Health Continuum - Short Form) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. The results obtained showed that the greatest positive predictors of well-being were extraversion (t = 3.412; s = .157; p < .01); pleasantness (t = 2,901; s =.144; p < .01); responsibility (t = 3.851; s = 195; p < .01) and goals in relation to learning and mastery of knowledge (t = 2.446; s = .103; p <.05). Similarly, it was found that the only negative predictor was the personality trait neuroticism (t = -3.555; s = -.184; p < .01). Likewise, it was found that there are statistically significant differences in the social well-being (t(410 ) =  1.816, p < .05) between men and women. Finally, it was found that the psychological well-being varied according to age (F(2,411),  p < .05) where the older age group presented higher levels of psychological well-being. In terms of total well-being (F(2,411), p < .05), it was found that the greater the age, the greater the total well-being. In view of the results obtained, it can be affirmed that both the personality and the motivation for learning are variables that predict the total well-being of the students. Likewise, it is recorded that levels of well-being vary according to gender and age.","PeriodicalId":41495,"journal":{"name":"Psicodebate-Psicologia Cultura y Sociedad","volume":"19 1","pages":"40-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicodebate-Psicologia Cultura y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18682/pd.v19i2.910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether academic motivation and personality traits predict the welfare of police cadets, while analyzing differences in well-being according to sex and age. The sample consisted of 411 cadets with an average age of 24.08 years (SD = 3.18) belonging to a state police institution. The instruments used were BFI (Big Five Inventory), EMA – M (Learning Goal Scale), MHC– SF (Mental Health Continuum - Short Form) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. The results obtained showed that the greatest positive predictors of well-being were extraversion (t = 3.412; s = .157; p < .01); pleasantness (t = 2,901; s =.144; p < .01); responsibility (t = 3.851; s = 195; p < .01) and goals in relation to learning and mastery of knowledge (t = 2.446; s = .103; p <.05). Similarly, it was found that the only negative predictor was the personality trait neuroticism (t = -3.555; s = -.184; p < .01). Likewise, it was found that there are statistically significant differences in the social well-being (t(410 ) =  1.816, p < .05) between men and women. Finally, it was found that the psychological well-being varied according to age (F(2,411),  p < .05) where the older age group presented higher levels of psychological well-being. In terms of total well-being (F(2,411), p < .05), it was found that the greater the age, the greater the total well-being. In view of the results obtained, it can be affirmed that both the personality and the motivation for learning are variables that predict the total well-being of the students. Likewise, it is recorded that levels of well-being vary according to gender and age.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习目标和个性特征作为警察机构学员幸福感的预测因素
本研究的目的是调查学习动机和人格特征是否能预测警察学员的福利,同时分析不同性别和年龄的幸福感差异。样本由411名学员组成,他们的平均年龄为24.08岁(SD=3.18),属于国家警察机构。使用的工具是BFI(五大清单)、EMA–M(学习目标量表)、MHC–SF(心理健康连续体-简表)和社会人口学问卷。所获得的结果表明,幸福感的最大积极预测因素是外向型(t=3.412;s=.157;p<0.01);愉悦感(t=2901;s=.144;p<.01);与学习和掌握知识相关的责任感(t=3.851;s=195;p<.01)和目标(t=2.446;s=.103;p<.05)。同样,发现唯一的负面预测因素是人格特质神经质(t=-3.555;s=-.184;p<.001)。同样地,发现社会幸福感存在统计学显著差异(t(410)=1.816,p<0.05)。最后,研究发现,心理健康状况因年龄而异(F(2411),p<0.05),其中年龄较大的群体表现出较高的心理健康水平。就总体幸福感而言(F(2411),p<0.05),发现年龄越大,总体幸福感越大。从所获得的结果来看,可以肯定的是,人格和学习动机都是预测学生整体幸福感的变量。同样,据记录,幸福水平因性别和年龄而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psicodebate-Psicologia Cultura y Sociedad
Psicodebate-Psicologia Cultura y Sociedad PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Análisis Psicométrico de la Escala del Perdón en las Relaciones de Pareja en Mujeres de la Ciudad de Arequipa Los patrones de amistad: Estructura, bienestar psicológico y soledad social y emocional Salud mental de niños, niñas y adolescentes argentinos, y pandemia por COVID-19: factores de riesgo y lecciones aprendidas La relación entre el uso problemático del smartphone y el fear of missing out: un meta-análisis Adultez emergente y trabajo: un modelo de la intención de permanencia en jóvenes trabajadores chilenos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1