TURKISH VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT ATTITUDE SCALE

IF 0.7 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Sport and Health Research Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.58727/jshr.85709
S. Karakullukçu, N. Beyhun, G. Can, M. Topbaş
{"title":"TURKISH VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT ATTITUDE SCALE","authors":"S. Karakullukçu, N. Beyhun, G. Can, M. Topbaş","doi":"10.58727/jshr.85709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the majority of researchers, “attitudes” are the main determinants in using doping substances. The Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS), constituting one of the examples in this context, is a 17-item self-report scale. In the present study, it was aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of PEAS. The scale was conducted among 224 licensed athletes over the age of 18. A construct analysis was applied. Factor analysis was performed to assess the construct validity and to examine construct reliability. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) test was carried out to evaluate test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to assess the factor structure of the scale. To assess the validity of the scale, The Attitude Scale Related to the Use of Doping (ASRUD) was used. In the exploratory factor analysis of 17 item one-dimensional scale, it was found that the factor loadings vary between 0.298 and 0.700, excluding items 1 and 7, which had low factor loadings. According to the confirmatory factor analysis, fit and fit indices of the scale were low in first and seventh items and acceptable in other items, as in exploratory factor analysis. RMSEA value was found as 0.086. As a result of the method used to test the validity, there was a negative correlation between PEAS and ASRUD scores (r=-0.302; p<0.001). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.822 and ICC was 0.897. This study suggests that PEAS is a valid and reliable scale to assess performance enhancement attitudes in Turkey.","PeriodicalId":44847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport and Health Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport and Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58727/jshr.85709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the majority of researchers, “attitudes” are the main determinants in using doping substances. The Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS), constituting one of the examples in this context, is a 17-item self-report scale. In the present study, it was aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of PEAS. The scale was conducted among 224 licensed athletes over the age of 18. A construct analysis was applied. Factor analysis was performed to assess the construct validity and to examine construct reliability. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) test was carried out to evaluate test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to assess the factor structure of the scale. To assess the validity of the scale, The Attitude Scale Related to the Use of Doping (ASRUD) was used. In the exploratory factor analysis of 17 item one-dimensional scale, it was found that the factor loadings vary between 0.298 and 0.700, excluding items 1 and 7, which had low factor loadings. According to the confirmatory factor analysis, fit and fit indices of the scale were low in first and seventh items and acceptable in other items, as in exploratory factor analysis. RMSEA value was found as 0.086. As a result of the method used to test the validity, there was a negative correlation between PEAS and ASRUD scores (r=-0.302; p<0.001). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.822 and ICC was 0.897. This study suggests that PEAS is a valid and reliable scale to assess performance enhancement attitudes in Turkey.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绩效增强态度量表的土耳其语验证与信度研究
大多数研究人员认为,“态度”是使用兴奋剂的主要决定因素。绩效提升态度量表(PEAS)是一个17项的自我报告量表,是本文中的一个例子。在本研究中,旨在确定土耳其版PEAS的有效性和可靠性。该量表在224名18岁以上的持证运动员中进行。应用构造分析。因子分析用于评估结构的有效性和检验结构的可靠性。进行组内相关系数(ICC)测试以评估重测的可靠性。对量表的因子结构进行了验证性因子分析。为了评估量表的有效性,使用了与使用兴奋剂有关的态度量表(ASRUD)。在对17项一维量表的探索性因子分析中,发现因子负荷在0.298至0.700之间变化,不包括因子负荷较低的第1项和第7项。根据验证性因素分析,与探索性因素分析一样,量表的拟合指数在第一项和第七项中较低,在其他项目中可接受。RMSEA值为0.086。作为检验有效性的方法的结果,PEAS和ASRUD评分之间存在负相关(r=-0.302;p<0.001)。Cronbachα系数为0.822,ICC为0.897。这项研究表明,PEAS是评估土耳其绩效提升态度的有效和可靠的量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport and Health Research
Journal of Sport and Health Research HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sport and Healt Research is a multidisciplinary journal that features investigations, studies, and reviews. The journal aim is to serve as a tool for scientific spreading and scientific research in the field of physical activity and health. On that score, the journal includes issues that are related to physical activity, sports, health and education.
期刊最新文献
Effects of aerobic morning intervention on body composition changes in young women of morning and neither chronotypes EL EFECTO DE UN PROGRAMA COMBINADO DE EJERCICIO Y FIJACIÓN DE OBJETIVOS SOBRE LA MEJORA EN LA CALIDAD DE VIDA Y LA REDUCCIÓN DE LA ANSIEDAD Y LA DEPRESIÓN EN PACIENTES CON ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE Desempeño académico y autoconcepto como mediadores de hábitos saludables: modelo lineal en adolescentes Desplazamiento activo al centro educativo y las influencias del entorno físico social y hábitos de estilo de vida en adolescentes españoles Análisis electromiográfico durante la marcha humana en estudiantes universitarios de Chile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1