Diagnostic challenges in postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis in critically ill patients: When to reoperate?

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Postȩpy higieny i medycyny doświadczalnej Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2478/ahem-2022-0032
N. Alzerwi
{"title":"Diagnostic challenges in postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis in critically ill patients: When to reoperate?","authors":"N. Alzerwi","doi":"10.2478/ahem-2022-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present paper was done to review common diagnostic techniques used to help surgeons find the most suitable way to diagnose postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS). The topic was searched on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Collected articles were classified and checked for their quality. Findings of selected research were included in this study and analyzed to find the best diagnostic method for intra-abdominal sepsis. IAS presents severe morbidity and mortality, and its early diagnosis can improve the outcome. Currently, there is no consensus among surgeons on a single diagnostic modality that should be used while deciding reoperation in patients with postoperative IAS. Though it has a high sensitivity for abdominal infections, computed tomography has limited applications due to mobility and time constraints. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a safe process that produces usable images, and can be used at the bedside. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) has high sensitivity, and the patients testing positive through DPL can be subjected to exploratory laparotomy, depending on severity. Abdominal Reoperation Predictive Index (ARPI) is the only index reported as an aid for this purpose. Serial intra-abdominal pressure measurement has also emerged as a potential diagnostic tool. A proper selection of diagnostic modality is expected to improve the outcome in IAS, which presents high mortality risk and a limited time frame.","PeriodicalId":20347,"journal":{"name":"Postȩpy higieny i medycyny doświadczalnej","volume":"76 1","pages":"420 - 430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postȩpy higieny i medycyny doświadczalnej","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ahem-2022-0032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The present paper was done to review common diagnostic techniques used to help surgeons find the most suitable way to diagnose postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS). The topic was searched on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Collected articles were classified and checked for their quality. Findings of selected research were included in this study and analyzed to find the best diagnostic method for intra-abdominal sepsis. IAS presents severe morbidity and mortality, and its early diagnosis can improve the outcome. Currently, there is no consensus among surgeons on a single diagnostic modality that should be used while deciding reoperation in patients with postoperative IAS. Though it has a high sensitivity for abdominal infections, computed tomography has limited applications due to mobility and time constraints. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a safe process that produces usable images, and can be used at the bedside. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) has high sensitivity, and the patients testing positive through DPL can be subjected to exploratory laparotomy, depending on severity. Abdominal Reoperation Predictive Index (ARPI) is the only index reported as an aid for this purpose. Serial intra-abdominal pressure measurement has also emerged as a potential diagnostic tool. A proper selection of diagnostic modality is expected to improve the outcome in IAS, which presents high mortality risk and a limited time frame.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重患者术后腹腔内败血症的诊断挑战:何时重新手术?
摘要本文综述了常用的诊断技术,以帮助外科医生找到诊断术后腹腔内败血症(IAS)的最合适方法。该主题在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了搜索。收集的文章被分类并检查其质量。本研究纳入了选定研究的结果,并对其进行了分析,以找到腹腔内败血症的最佳诊断方法。IAS具有严重的发病率和死亡率,早期诊断可以改善预后。目前,外科医生对决定术后IAS患者再次手术时应使用的单一诊断模式没有达成共识。尽管计算机断层扫描对腹部感染具有很高的敏感性,但由于行动能力和时间限制,其应用有限。腹腔镜诊断是一个安全的过程,可以产生可用的图像,并且可以在床边使用。诊断性腹膜灌洗(DPL)具有很高的敏感性,通过DPL检测呈阳性的患者可以根据严重程度进行剖腹探查。腹部再手术预测指数(ARPI)是唯一一个用于此目的的辅助指标。一系列的腹内压力测量也已成为一种潜在的诊断工具。正确选择诊断模式有望改善IAS的结果,IAS具有高死亡率和有限的时间框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postȩpy higieny i medycyny doświadczalnej
Postȩpy higieny i medycyny doświadczalnej MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Hygiene and Experimental Medicine (PHMD) is a scientific journal affiliated with the Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy by the Polish Academy of Sciences in Wrocław. The journal publishes articles from the field of experimental medicine and related sciences, with particular emphasis on immunology, oncology, cell biology, microbiology, and genetics. The journal publishes review and original works both in Polish and English. All journal publications are available via the Open Access formula in line with the principles of the Creative Commons licence.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of selected psychological parameters: Perception of happiness and hope of success in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus Anti-inflammatory activity of novel natural plant extracts composition—LevidorTM Liver complications of total parenteral nutrition: the latest therapeutic strategies Devices for the treatment of arterial hypertension Analgesic effects of oxycodone hydrochloride injection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and influence on substance P, 5-hydroxytryptamine, and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1