Developing an outcome measure for an adult intellectual disabilities intensive support team – a practice paper

Jason Lines, Kiran Krishnadas
{"title":"Developing an outcome measure for an adult intellectual disabilities intensive support team – a practice paper","authors":"Jason Lines, Kiran Krishnadas","doi":"10.1108/amhid-11-2022-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to outline the initial pilot use of the client complexity matrix (CCM), an outcome measure developed for an NHS Adult Intellectual Disabilities Intensive Support Team (IST) in the West Midlands of England.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA mixed method approach was used to report the results and evaluate the use of the CCM within this IST. The CCM was trialled for six months between January 2022 and June 2022. CCM scores pre and post IST intervention were analysed via t-test, and qualitative feedback from clinicians is detailed.\n\n\nFindings\nAnalysis suggests the CCM captures service success showing a significant decrease in complexity and risk post-intervention. Qualitative comments from clinicians were generally positive; however, there were requested changes regarding specific presentations, use of labels/language and for a digital version.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe tool is not co-constructed with the client. Because of this IST’s caseload, the sample size was small. Only one clinician was asked to complete the CCM pre and post intervention. Future use of the measure will encourage two clinicians to complete the measure to evidence its inter-rater reliability. Each client’s specific presentation was not explicitly analysed here.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe CCM will be updated using the feedback from clinicians and from the peer review process. Research that examines the generalisability of this measure to other IST services would be beneficial.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe CCM appears to fill a gap in outcome measurements for this IST service which looks at breadth and depth of client complexity and risk.\n","PeriodicalId":44693,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-11-2022-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to outline the initial pilot use of the client complexity matrix (CCM), an outcome measure developed for an NHS Adult Intellectual Disabilities Intensive Support Team (IST) in the West Midlands of England. Design/methodology/approach A mixed method approach was used to report the results and evaluate the use of the CCM within this IST. The CCM was trialled for six months between January 2022 and June 2022. CCM scores pre and post IST intervention were analysed via t-test, and qualitative feedback from clinicians is detailed. Findings Analysis suggests the CCM captures service success showing a significant decrease in complexity and risk post-intervention. Qualitative comments from clinicians were generally positive; however, there were requested changes regarding specific presentations, use of labels/language and for a digital version. Research limitations/implications The tool is not co-constructed with the client. Because of this IST’s caseload, the sample size was small. Only one clinician was asked to complete the CCM pre and post intervention. Future use of the measure will encourage two clinicians to complete the measure to evidence its inter-rater reliability. Each client’s specific presentation was not explicitly analysed here. Practical implications The CCM will be updated using the feedback from clinicians and from the peer review process. Research that examines the generalisability of this measure to other IST services would be beneficial. Originality/value The CCM appears to fill a gap in outcome measurements for this IST service which looks at breadth and depth of client complexity and risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定成人智障强化支持团队的结果测量-一份实践论文
目的本文旨在概述客户复杂性矩阵(CCM)的初步试点使用,这是一项为英国西米德兰兹郡的NHS成人智力残疾强化支持团队(IST)开发的结果测量。设计/方法/方法采用混合方法报告结果并评估CCM在本IST中的使用情况。CCM在2022年1月至2022年6月期间进行了为期六个月的试验。通过t检验分析IST干预前后的CCM评分,并详细说明临床医生的定性反馈。FindingsAnalysis表明,CCM捕捉到的服务成功表明,干预后的复杂性和风险显著降低。临床医生的定性评价总体上是积极的;然而,有人要求更改具体演示、标签/语言的使用以及数字版本。研究局限性/含义该工具不是与客户共同构建的。由于IST的案件数量,样本量很小。只有一名临床医生被要求在干预前后完成CCM。该措施的未来使用将鼓励两名临床医生完成该措施,以证明其评分者间的可靠性。这里没有明确分析每位客户的具体陈述。实际含义CCM将使用临床医生和同行评审过程的反馈进行更新。研究这一措施对其他IST服务的可推广性将是有益的。独创性/价值CCM似乎填补了这项IST服务在结果衡量方面的空白,该服务着眼于客户复杂性和风险的广度和深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Kind minds: using the ‘compassionate kitbag’ in a compassion focused therapy group for adults with intellectual disabilities To say (sexual fetish)… or not to say (sexual fetish). That is the question Assessing adherence to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence dementia assessment and diagnosis guidelines in adults with intellectual disability: a retrospective cohort study Project ECHO-AIDD: recommendations for care of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities Forensic mental health intellectual and developmental disability service: an analysis of referral patterns and comparison with community mental health intellectual disability (MHID) services in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1