Whose English gets paid off?—Neoliberal discourses of English and ethnic minority students’ subjectivities in China

IF 1.5 1区 文学 Q2 LINGUISTICS Journal of Sociolinguistics Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1111/josl.12631
Xiaoyan (Grace) Guo, Michelle Mingyue Gu
{"title":"Whose English gets paid off?—Neoliberal discourses of English and ethnic minority students’ subjectivities in China","authors":"Xiaoyan (Grace) Guo,&nbsp;Michelle Mingyue Gu","doi":"10.1111/josl.12631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study traces the trajectories of Uyghur college students’ subjectivity construction and transformation from Foucault's governmentality perspective. Drawing on ethnographic data of two telling cases, it explores how minoritized students’ subjectivities were linked to neoliberal discourses of English and constituted by power techniques, self-technologies, and affective dispositions embedded in wider institutional transformations. Participants were found experiencing a shift to the individualistic subjectivity associated with academic achievement and performance in English away from the collective identity of “authentic Uyghur” symbolized by the Uyghur language. Two salient discourses of English, i.e., English as constraints, and English as academic excellence, emerging from the neoliberal-oriented institutional English language education policies and practices, shaped the participants either as incompetent English learners or elite subjects. Participants learned to responsibilitize themselves through such self-technologies as confession and preaching, and affective practices. Yet, technologies of hope and optimism became for a few the enjoyment of experiences and performance of elitism while projecting a majority disadvantaged as affectively problematic others. The self-technologies and affective responses without recognition of larger structures of inequality could further reinforce the neoliberal logic. The affective labor of sense of solidarity, commitment to community, empathy for the deprived ones with critical reflection and collective action, nevertheless, may counter neoliberal logic and point to an alternative path to meaning-making and social relations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociolinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociolinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josl.12631","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study traces the trajectories of Uyghur college students’ subjectivity construction and transformation from Foucault's governmentality perspective. Drawing on ethnographic data of two telling cases, it explores how minoritized students’ subjectivities were linked to neoliberal discourses of English and constituted by power techniques, self-technologies, and affective dispositions embedded in wider institutional transformations. Participants were found experiencing a shift to the individualistic subjectivity associated with academic achievement and performance in English away from the collective identity of “authentic Uyghur” symbolized by the Uyghur language. Two salient discourses of English, i.e., English as constraints, and English as academic excellence, emerging from the neoliberal-oriented institutional English language education policies and practices, shaped the participants either as incompetent English learners or elite subjects. Participants learned to responsibilitize themselves through such self-technologies as confession and preaching, and affective practices. Yet, technologies of hope and optimism became for a few the enjoyment of experiences and performance of elitism while projecting a majority disadvantaged as affectively problematic others. The self-technologies and affective responses without recognition of larger structures of inequality could further reinforce the neoliberal logic. The affective labor of sense of solidarity, commitment to community, empathy for the deprived ones with critical reflection and collective action, nevertheless, may counter neoliberal logic and point to an alternative path to meaning-making and social relations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁的英语得到了回报?新自由主义英语话语与中国少数民族学生的主体性
本研究以福柯的治理心态为视角,追溯了维吾尔族大学生主体性建构与转型的轨迹。根据两个有说服力的案例的人种学数据,它探讨了少数民族学生的主观主义如何与英语的新自由主义话语联系在一起,并由嵌入更广泛的制度变革中的权力技巧、自我技术和情感倾向构成。研究发现,参与者正在经历一种与英语学习成绩和表现相关的个人主义主体性的转变,从维吾尔语所象征的“真正的维吾尔人”的集体身份转变。从新自由主义导向的机构英语教育政策和实践中产生的两种突出的英语话语,即英语作为约束和英语作为学术卓越,将参与者塑造成不称职的英语学习者或精英学科。参与者通过忏悔、说教和情感实践等自我技术学会了承担责任。然而,对少数人来说,希望和乐观的技术变成了精英主义经验和表现的享受,同时将大多数弱势群体视为情感上有问题的其他人。不承认更大的不平等结构的自我技术和情感反应可能会进一步强化新自由主义逻辑。然而,团结感、对社区的承诺、通过批判性反思和集体行动对被剥夺者的同情等情感劳动,可能会与新自由主义逻辑背道而驰,并为意义创造和社会关系指明另一条道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Journal of Sociolinguistics promotes sociolinguistics as a thoroughly linguistic and thoroughly social-scientific endeavour. The journal is concerned with language in all its dimensions, macro and micro, as formal features or abstract discourses, as situated talk or written text. Data in published articles represent a wide range of languages, regions and situations - from Alune to Xhosa, from Cameroun to Canada, from bulletin boards to dating ads.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Accommodation, translanguaging, and (in)discreteness in the repertoire: A scalar-chronotopic approach African American English, racialized femininities, and Asian American identity in Ali Wong's Baby Cobra Analyzing linguistic variation using discursive worlds Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1