Influence of external shocks on the spatial structure of the population of the border Territories

P. Druzhinin, D. Zimin
{"title":"Influence of external shocks on the spatial structure of the population of the border Territories","authors":"P. Druzhinin, D. Zimin","doi":"10.21638/spbu05.2019.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines changes in the spatial structure of the population in border regions of Finland and Russia along the Finnish-Russian and Finnish-Swedish borders in 1970–2016.The influence of external shocks (such as Russia’s economic reforms, liberalization of the border regime, and Finland’s accession to the EU) is analyzed. The article then identifies patterns of change in the population of territorial units, depending on their geographic location. Statistical models linking the dynamics of the population of territorial units and their location show that only since the early 1990s, i.e. during and after the aforementioned shocks, did population dynamics start to depend on distance to the regional capital and so-called “active zones.” On the Russian side, a few border municipalities were identified as active zones — they participate actively in cross-border cooperation and have developed transport and customs infrastructure, including international border crossing points. On the Finnish side, active zones include cities with strong regional universities generating and disseminating innovations. Cooperation of Finnish eastern border subregions with the Russian Federation has not had a significant impact. In contrast, some Finnish western coastal regions with small universities benefit more tangibly from their cooperation with Sweden. This collaboration increases their innovation potential. The results of the study could be useful for public bodies in charge of the development of border and peripheral regions.","PeriodicalId":41730,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Ekonomika-St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Ekonomika-St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2019.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article examines changes in the spatial structure of the population in border regions of Finland and Russia along the Finnish-Russian and Finnish-Swedish borders in 1970–2016.The influence of external shocks (such as Russia’s economic reforms, liberalization of the border regime, and Finland’s accession to the EU) is analyzed. The article then identifies patterns of change in the population of territorial units, depending on their geographic location. Statistical models linking the dynamics of the population of territorial units and their location show that only since the early 1990s, i.e. during and after the aforementioned shocks, did population dynamics start to depend on distance to the regional capital and so-called “active zones.” On the Russian side, a few border municipalities were identified as active zones — they participate actively in cross-border cooperation and have developed transport and customs infrastructure, including international border crossing points. On the Finnish side, active zones include cities with strong regional universities generating and disseminating innovations. Cooperation of Finnish eastern border subregions with the Russian Federation has not had a significant impact. In contrast, some Finnish western coastal regions with small universities benefit more tangibly from their cooperation with Sweden. This collaboration increases their innovation potential. The results of the study could be useful for public bodies in charge of the development of border and peripheral regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外部冲击对边境地区人口空间结构的影响
本文考察了1970-2016年芬兰-俄罗斯和芬兰-瑞典边境地区芬兰和俄罗斯边境地区人口空间结构的变化。分析了外部冲击(如俄罗斯的经济改革、边境制度自由化和芬兰加入欧盟)的影响。然后,文章根据其地理位置确定了领土单位人口变化的模式。将领土单位的人口动态与其位置联系起来的统计模型表明,只有从20世纪90年代初开始,即在上述冲击期间和之后,人口动态才开始依赖于与地区首府和所谓的“活动区”的距离。在俄罗斯方面,几个边境城市被确定为活动区- -它们积极参与跨界合作,并发展了运输和海关基础设施,包括国际过境点。在芬兰方面,活跃区域包括拥有强大的地区大学的城市,这些大学产生和传播创新。芬兰东部边界分区域同俄罗斯联邦的合作没有产生重大影响。相比之下,一些拥有小型大学的芬兰西部沿海地区从与瑞典的合作中获益更多。这种合作增加了他们的创新潜力。这项研究的结果可能对负责边境和周边地区发展的公共机构有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Modeling the impact of stock exchange migration on trading volumes in competing markets Central bank digital currencies: An innovative tool for enhancing domestic and cross-border payments and settlements Green agenda in the modern practice of countries and regions: In search of a unified approach Reflection of the concept of energy transfer in the development strategies of industries and regions of Russia The verification of regional capital mobility in the Russian Federation: A spatial econometric approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1