Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides

Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p841
Mayra Luiza Schelter, Antonio Americo Prates, Diogo Luiz Fruet, Marissa Prá de Souza, N. Guerra, A. M. O. Oliveira Neto
{"title":"Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides","authors":"Mayra Luiza Schelter, Antonio Americo Prates, Diogo Luiz Fruet, Marissa Prá de Souza, N. Guerra, A. M. O. Oliveira Neto","doi":"10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herbicide selectivity is the basis for chemical control of weeds; however, it depends on the interactions between herbicide, crop, and edaphoclimatic conditions. The objective of this work was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides applied at the pre-emergence stage of soybean cultivars with different maturation times grown in different locations. The experiment was conducted under field conditions, in two crop seasons (2019/2020 and 2020/2021), in Lages and Curitibanos, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. A randomized block experimental design was used, with treatments organized in 4×3 (2019/2020) and 4×4 (2020/2021) factorial arrangements, with four replications. The treatments consisted of interactions between four soybean cultivars: BMX Raio IPRO® (Raio), BMX Zeus IPRO® (Zeus), MONSOY 5947 IPRO® (Monsoy), and BMX Fibra IPRO® (Fibra) and three or four herbicide treatments: control with no herbicides, sulfentrazone + diuron, and diclosulam in 2019/2020; and control with no herbicide, sulfentrazone + diuron, diclosulam, and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin in 2020/2021. The plots were evaluated for phytotoxicity of herbicides, canopy closure, plant height, stand of plants, number of pods per plant, one-thousand grain weight, and grain yield. The phytotoxicity of herbicides on the soybean plants was mild, under 11%, regardless of the cultivar and growth location. The soybean plants fully recovered from the injuries at 14 days after herbicide application. In Curitibanos, the cultivar Zeus presented higher grain yield in both crop seasons. The herbicide factor showed that sulfentrazone + diuron and diclosulam decreased the grain yield of the cultivars Raio and Zeus in 2019/2020. In the following crop season, only the cultivar Raio presented decreases in grain yield due to the application of diclosulam and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin. In Lages, the soybean cultivar factor affected the grain yield; the cultivars Monsoy and Fibra were the most productive.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Herbicide selectivity is the basis for chemical control of weeds; however, it depends on the interactions between herbicide, crop, and edaphoclimatic conditions. The objective of this work was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides applied at the pre-emergence stage of soybean cultivars with different maturation times grown in different locations. The experiment was conducted under field conditions, in two crop seasons (2019/2020 and 2020/2021), in Lages and Curitibanos, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. A randomized block experimental design was used, with treatments organized in 4×3 (2019/2020) and 4×4 (2020/2021) factorial arrangements, with four replications. The treatments consisted of interactions between four soybean cultivars: BMX Raio IPRO® (Raio), BMX Zeus IPRO® (Zeus), MONSOY 5947 IPRO® (Monsoy), and BMX Fibra IPRO® (Fibra) and three or four herbicide treatments: control with no herbicides, sulfentrazone + diuron, and diclosulam in 2019/2020; and control with no herbicide, sulfentrazone + diuron, diclosulam, and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin in 2020/2021. The plots were evaluated for phytotoxicity of herbicides, canopy closure, plant height, stand of plants, number of pods per plant, one-thousand grain weight, and grain yield. The phytotoxicity of herbicides on the soybean plants was mild, under 11%, regardless of the cultivar and growth location. The soybean plants fully recovered from the injuries at 14 days after herbicide application. In Curitibanos, the cultivar Zeus presented higher grain yield in both crop seasons. The herbicide factor showed that sulfentrazone + diuron and diclosulam decreased the grain yield of the cultivars Raio and Zeus in 2019/2020. In the following crop season, only the cultivar Raio presented decreases in grain yield due to the application of diclosulam and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin. In Lages, the soybean cultivar factor affected the grain yield; the cultivars Monsoy and Fibra were the most productive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
不同成熟期大豆品种对孕前除草剂的响应
除草剂选择性是杂草化学防治的基础;然而,这取决于除草剂、作物和气候条件之间的相互作用。本研究的目的是评价不同地点不同成熟期大豆品种出苗期除草剂的选择性。该试验在巴西圣卡塔琳娜州Lages和Curitibanos的两个作物季节(2019/2020和2020/2021)的田间条件下进行。采用随机区组试验设计,按4×3(2019/2020)和4×4(2020/2021)因子安排处理,共4个重复。4个大豆品种BMX Raio IPRO®(Raio)、BMX Zeus IPRO®(Zeus)、MONSOY 5947 IPRO®(MONSOY)和BMX Fibra IPRO®(Fibra)与3或4个除草剂处理的互作处理:2019/2020年无除草剂、磺胺曲酮+迪乌隆和双氯sulam对照;2020/2021年无除草剂、磺胺酮+迪乌龙、双氯磺胺、吡咯砜+氟恶嗪控制。评估了除草剂的植物毒性、冠层闭合、株高、植株林分、单株荚果数、千粒重和籽粒产量。除草剂对大豆植株的毒性较轻,不受品种和生长地点的影响,均在11%以下。施用除草剂后14 d,大豆植株完全恢复。在库里提巴诺斯,宙斯品种在两个作物季节都表现出较高的粮食产量。除草剂因子分析表明,2019/2020年,磺胺酮+双氯磺胺和双氯磺胺使“比奥”和“宙斯”两个品种减产。在接下来的作物季节,由于双氯sulam和pyroxasulfone + fluioxazin的施用,只有品种Raio的产量下降。大豆品种因素对籽粒产量影响较大;以Monsoy和Fibra品种产量最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1