What (wo)men want? Evidence from a factorial survey on preferred work hours in couples after childbirth

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY European Sociological Review Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1093/esr/jcad054
Katia Begall
{"title":"What (wo)men want? Evidence from a factorial survey on preferred work hours in couples after childbirth","authors":"Katia Begall","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcad054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The division of labour remains persistently gendered, in particular among couples with children. Previous research shows that women’s lower economic resources are an important factor driving these inequalities, but because gender and (relative) earnings are highly correlated in male–female couples, their relative importance is difficult to disentangle with observational data. Using a factorial survey conducted among approximately 700 employed men and women of childbearing age in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, the contribution of relative earnings and gender in explaining work-care divisions in couples with children is disentangled. The results show that men and women do not differ in their preferences for their own work hours after childbirth, but both prefer the father to work more hours than the mother. Moreover, the combination of own and partners’ preferred hours shows that men and women in all three countries prefer a modified male-breadwinner model after childbirth in scenarios where the male partner earns more or partners have equal earnings. Preferences for egalitarian divisions of labour appear to be slightly stronger in men compared to women and respondents with more egalitarian views on care tasks show less gender-specialization.","PeriodicalId":48237,"journal":{"name":"European Sociological Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The division of labour remains persistently gendered, in particular among couples with children. Previous research shows that women’s lower economic resources are an important factor driving these inequalities, but because gender and (relative) earnings are highly correlated in male–female couples, their relative importance is difficult to disentangle with observational data. Using a factorial survey conducted among approximately 700 employed men and women of childbearing age in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, the contribution of relative earnings and gender in explaining work-care divisions in couples with children is disentangled. The results show that men and women do not differ in their preferences for their own work hours after childbirth, but both prefer the father to work more hours than the mother. Moreover, the combination of own and partners’ preferred hours shows that men and women in all three countries prefer a modified male-breadwinner model after childbirth in scenarios where the male partner earns more or partners have equal earnings. Preferences for egalitarian divisions of labour appear to be slightly stronger in men compared to women and respondents with more egalitarian views on care tasks show less gender-specialization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男人想要什么?对生育后夫妇偏好工作时间的析因调查证据
劳动分工仍然存在性别歧视,特别是在有孩子的夫妇之间。先前的研究表明,女性较低的经济资源是导致这些不平等的一个重要因素,但由于性别和(相对)收入在男女伴侣中高度相关,因此很难从观察数据中理清它们的相对重要性。通过对瑞典、英国和荷兰约700名育龄就业男女进行的析因调查,揭示了相对收入和性别在解释有孩子夫妇的工作照顾划分方面的贡献。结果表明,男性和女性在产后对自己工作时间的偏好上没有差异,但都更喜欢父亲比母亲工作更多的时间。此外,自己和伴侣的首选工作时间的组合表明,在男性伴侣收入更多或伴侣收入相等的情况下,这三个国家的男性和女性都更喜欢产后的改良男性养家糊口模式。与女性相比,男性对平等分工的偏好似乎略强,对护理任务持更平等观点的受访者显示性别专业化程度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: European Sociological Review contains articles in all fields of sociology ranging in length from short research notes up to major reports.
期刊最新文献
School composition and academic decisions Family structure and policy contexts: implications for tertiary education attainment in 25 European countries Steeper at the top: cognitive ability and earnings in Finland and Norway Online calls for protest and offline mobilization in autocracies: evidence from the 2017 Dey Protests in Iran Intensity of educational expansion: a key factor in explaining educational inequality across regions and cohorts in Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1