Failure or Reasonable Move?: Portrayal of American Pullout from Afghanistan in Russian and American International Media

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Electronic News Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1177/19312431231165931
Ivanka Pjesivac, Iveta Imre, Leslie Klein, A. Petrov
{"title":"Failure or Reasonable Move?: Portrayal of American Pullout from Afghanistan in Russian and American International Media","authors":"Ivanka Pjesivac, Iveta Imre, Leslie Klein, A. Petrov","doi":"10.1177/19312431231165931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined competing narratives about the actions of the United States abroad through an analysis of 314 news items of the 2021 American withdrawal from Afghanistan by two media organizations: Russian Sputnik and American Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. The textual analysis revealed five dominant themes in Sputnik: Americans as losers and Taliban as winners, Americans as incompetent, Americans as unreliable, insensitive, and irresponsible, Americans as duplicitous, and Americans as a threat to world peace; and four dominant themes in RFE/RL: The Taliban taking over the country quickly, Americans successfully leading the evacuations, Americans having good faith and defending the decision to pull out, and Americans as naïve and lacking good judgment. The findings are interpreted in light of the image theory and second-level agenda setting theory.","PeriodicalId":29929,"journal":{"name":"Electronic News","volume":"17 1","pages":"247 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431231165931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined competing narratives about the actions of the United States abroad through an analysis of 314 news items of the 2021 American withdrawal from Afghanistan by two media organizations: Russian Sputnik and American Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. The textual analysis revealed five dominant themes in Sputnik: Americans as losers and Taliban as winners, Americans as incompetent, Americans as unreliable, insensitive, and irresponsible, Americans as duplicitous, and Americans as a threat to world peace; and four dominant themes in RFE/RL: The Taliban taking over the country quickly, Americans successfully leading the evacuations, Americans having good faith and defending the decision to pull out, and Americans as naïve and lacking good judgment. The findings are interpreted in light of the image theory and second-level agenda setting theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失败还是合理?俄罗斯和美国国际媒体对美国从阿富汗撤军的描述
这项研究通过分析俄罗斯人造卫星和美国自由欧洲电台/自由电台这两个媒体机构2021年美国从阿富汗撤军的314条新闻,研究了关于美国海外行动的相互竞争的叙述。文本分析揭示了人造卫星的五个主要主题:美国人是失败者,塔利班是胜利者,美国人是无能的,美国人是不可靠、不敏感和不负责任的,美国人口是心非,美国人是对世界和平的威胁;RFE/RL中的四个主要主题:塔利班迅速接管了这个国家,美国人成功地领导了撤离行动,美国人有诚意并为撤军的决定辩护,美国人天真且缺乏良好的判断力。根据形象理论和二级议程设置理论对研究结果进行了解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic News
Electronic News COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Does Tribe Trump Facts? Novel Measures of Hostile Media The Social Media Comment Section as an Unruly Public Arena: How Comment Reading Erodes Trust in News Media Innovation and Determination: How Local American TV Journalists Told the COVID-19 “Story of a Lifetime” “Standard” Appearance and “Accentless” Speech: How Performance Neutrality Limits Diversity in Broadcast News Attitudes of U.S. Public Broadcasters: A Liberal Helping of Interpretive Journalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1