On the Failure of the Area Metric for Validation Exercises of Stochastic Simulations

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI:10.1115/1.4056492
L. Eça, K. Dowding, P. Roache
{"title":"On the Failure of the Area Metric for Validation Exercises of Stochastic Simulations","authors":"L. Eça, K. Dowding, P. Roache","doi":"10.1115/1.4056492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper discusses the application of the Area Metric to the quantification of modeling errors. The focus of the discussion is the effect of the shape of the two distributions on the result produced by the Area Metric. Two different examples that assume negligible experimental and numerical errors are presented: the first case has experimental and simulated quantities of interest defined by normal distributions that require the definition of a mean value and a standard deviation; the second example is taken from the V&V10.1 ASME Standard.\n The first example, shows that relatively small differences between the mean values are sufficient for the area metric to be insensitive to the standard deviation. Furthermore, the example of the V&V10.1 ASME Standard produces an Area Metric equal to the difference between the mean values of experiments and simulations. Therefore, the error quantification is reduced to a single number that is obtained from a simple difference of two mean values. This means that the Area Metric fails to reflect a dependence for the difference in the shape of the distributions representing variability.\n The paper also presents an alternative version of the Area Metric that does not filter the effect of the shape of the distributions by utilizing a reference simulation that has the same mean value of the experiments. This means that the quantification of the modeling error will have contributions from the difference in mean values and from the shape of the distributions.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the application of the Area Metric to the quantification of modeling errors. The focus of the discussion is the effect of the shape of the two distributions on the result produced by the Area Metric. Two different examples that assume negligible experimental and numerical errors are presented: the first case has experimental and simulated quantities of interest defined by normal distributions that require the definition of a mean value and a standard deviation; the second example is taken from the V&V10.1 ASME Standard. The first example, shows that relatively small differences between the mean values are sufficient for the area metric to be insensitive to the standard deviation. Furthermore, the example of the V&V10.1 ASME Standard produces an Area Metric equal to the difference between the mean values of experiments and simulations. Therefore, the error quantification is reduced to a single number that is obtained from a simple difference of two mean values. This means that the Area Metric fails to reflect a dependence for the difference in the shape of the distributions representing variability. The paper also presents an alternative version of the Area Metric that does not filter the effect of the shape of the distributions by utilizing a reference simulation that has the same mean value of the experiments. This means that the quantification of the modeling error will have contributions from the difference in mean values and from the shape of the distributions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论随机模拟验证练习中面积度量的失效
本文讨论了面积度量在建模误差量化中的应用。讨论的重点是两个分布的形状对面积度量产生的结果的影响。提出了两个不同的例子,假设实验和数值误差可以忽略不计:第一种情况具有由正态分布定义的感兴趣的实验和模拟量,需要定义平均值和标准差;第二个例子取自V&V10.1 ASME标准。第一个例子表明,平均值之间相对较小的差异足以使面积度量对标准偏差不敏感。此外,V&V10.1 ASME标准的例子产生的面积度量等于实验和模拟的平均值之间的差。因此,误差量化被简化为由两个平均值的简单差得到的单个数字。这意味着面积度量不能反映代表可变性的分布形状差异的依赖性。本文还提出了面积度量的替代版本,该版本不通过利用具有相同实验平均值的参考模拟来过滤分布形状的影响。这意味着建模误差的量化将受到均值差异和分布形状的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
A Curved Surface Integral Method for Reliability Analysis of Multiple Failure Modes System with Non-Overlapping Failure Domains A Framework for Developing Systematic Testbeds for Multi-Fidelity Optimization Techniques Reliability Analysis for RV Reducer by Combining PCE and Saddlepoint Approximation Considering Multi-Failure Modes Machine Learning-Based Resilience Modeling and Assessment of High Consequence Systems Under Uncertainty Posterior Covariance Matrix Approximations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1