On the Verification of Finite Element Determinations of Stress Concentration Factors for Handbooks

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4063064
A. Kardak, G. Sinclair
{"title":"On the Verification of Finite Element Determinations of Stress Concentration Factors for Handbooks","authors":"A. Kardak, G. Sinclair","doi":"10.1115/1.4063064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Here we offer an approach for being reasonably sure that finite element determinations of stress concentration factors are accurate enough to be included in engineering handbooks. The approach has two contributors. The first consists of analyzing a stress concentration on a sequence of systematically refined meshes until the error estimates of ASME have that sufficient accuracy has been achieved. The second consists of constructing a test problem with an exact and somewhat higher value of its stress concentration factor, then analyzing this test problem with the same sequence of meshes and showing that, in fact, sufficient accuracy has been achieved. In combination, these two means of verification are applied to a series of U-notches in a plate under tension. Together they show that it is reasonable to regard finite element values of stress concentration factors on the finest meshes as being accurate to three significant figures. Given this level of accuracy it is then also reasonable to use the approach to verify other existing stress concentration factors and resolve any discrepancies between them, as well as to verify new stress concentration factors.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Here we offer an approach for being reasonably sure that finite element determinations of stress concentration factors are accurate enough to be included in engineering handbooks. The approach has two contributors. The first consists of analyzing a stress concentration on a sequence of systematically refined meshes until the error estimates of ASME have that sufficient accuracy has been achieved. The second consists of constructing a test problem with an exact and somewhat higher value of its stress concentration factor, then analyzing this test problem with the same sequence of meshes and showing that, in fact, sufficient accuracy has been achieved. In combination, these two means of verification are applied to a series of U-notches in a plate under tension. Together they show that it is reasonable to regard finite element values of stress concentration factors on the finest meshes as being accurate to three significant figures. Given this level of accuracy it is then also reasonable to use the approach to verify other existing stress concentration factors and resolve any discrepancies between them, as well as to verify new stress concentration factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手册应力集中系数有限元计算的验证
在这里,我们提供了一种方法,可以合理地确保应力集中因子的有限元确定足够准确,可以包含在工程手册中。这种方法有两个贡献者。第一步包括分析一系列系统细化网格上的应力集中,直到ASME的误差估计达到足够的精度。第二种方法是构造一个具有精确且略高应力集中因子值的测试问题,然后用相同的网格序列分析该测试问题,并表明事实上已经达到了足够的精度。在组合中,这两种验证方法适用于张力下板上的一系列U形缺口。它们一起表明,将最细网格上的应力集中因子的有限元值视为精确到三个有效数字是合理的。考虑到这种精度水平,使用该方法来验证其他现有的应力集中因子并解决它们之间的任何差异,以及验证新的应力聚集因子也是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
A Curved Surface Integral Method for Reliability Analysis of Multiple Failure Modes System with Non-Overlapping Failure Domains A Framework for Developing Systematic Testbeds for Multi-Fidelity Optimization Techniques Reliability Analysis for RV Reducer by Combining PCE and Saddlepoint Approximation Considering Multi-Failure Modes Machine Learning-Based Resilience Modeling and Assessment of High Consequence Systems Under Uncertainty Posterior Covariance Matrix Approximations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1