Comparative study to correlate hematological parameters with the severity of birth asphyxia

R. Mamatha, J. Meena, P. Sulaniya, R. Sehra, S. Verma
{"title":"Comparative study to correlate hematological parameters with the severity of birth asphyxia","authors":"R. Mamatha, J. Meena, P. Sulaniya, R. Sehra, S. Verma","doi":"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_61_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Birth asphyxia can alter biophysical characteristics of erythrocytes, leukocytes and platelets. Nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) in the umbilical venous blood of neonates has been reported as a possible marker of perinatal asphyxia. NRBCs, platelet count, total leukocyte count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were taken as hematological parameters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the various hematological changes following birth asphyxia and their correlation with the severity of birth asphyxia and its outcome. Materials and Methods: It was hospital-based comparative observation study conducted in neonatal units of a tertiary hospital in the northern part of India from May 2019 to May 2020. All term appropriate for gestational age newborns with birth asphyxia were taken as cases and healthy newborns as controls. The sample size of 80 participants in each group was calculated. 2 ml cord blood sample was taken for parameters used in the study. P < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in relation to sex distribution, birth weight, parity of mothers, and mode of delivery between cases and controls. NRBC and total leukocyte count were statistically positively correlated with the severity of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), whereas hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet counts were not statistically significant. Area under the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of NRBC was 0.812, and the NRBC count cutoff of >20 has a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 72%. Forty-six percent of total cases with NRBC 20 or more died. Conclusions: NRBC has a significant positive correlation with the severity of HIE and a negative with the Apgar score. NRBCs value more than or equal to 20 can be used as a prognostic marker for assessing the severity and outcome of birth asphyxia.","PeriodicalId":10321,"journal":{"name":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"60 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_61_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Birth asphyxia can alter biophysical characteristics of erythrocytes, leukocytes and platelets. Nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) in the umbilical venous blood of neonates has been reported as a possible marker of perinatal asphyxia. NRBCs, platelet count, total leukocyte count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were taken as hematological parameters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the various hematological changes following birth asphyxia and their correlation with the severity of birth asphyxia and its outcome. Materials and Methods: It was hospital-based comparative observation study conducted in neonatal units of a tertiary hospital in the northern part of India from May 2019 to May 2020. All term appropriate for gestational age newborns with birth asphyxia were taken as cases and healthy newborns as controls. The sample size of 80 participants in each group was calculated. 2 ml cord blood sample was taken for parameters used in the study. P < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in relation to sex distribution, birth weight, parity of mothers, and mode of delivery between cases and controls. NRBC and total leukocyte count were statistically positively correlated with the severity of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), whereas hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet counts were not statistically significant. Area under the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of NRBC was 0.812, and the NRBC count cutoff of >20 has a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 72%. Forty-six percent of total cases with NRBC 20 or more died. Conclusions: NRBC has a significant positive correlation with the severity of HIE and a negative with the Apgar score. NRBCs value more than or equal to 20 can be used as a prognostic marker for assessing the severity and outcome of birth asphyxia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液学参数与新生儿窒息严重程度相关性的比较研究
简介:出生窒息会改变红细胞、白细胞和血小板的生物物理特性。新生儿脐静脉血中的核红细胞(NRBC)已被报道为围产期窒息的可能标志物。取NRBCs、血小板计数、白细胞总数、血红蛋白和红细胞压积作为血液学参数。本研究的目的是评估出生窒息后的各种血液学变化及其与出生窒息严重程度及其结果的相关性。材料和方法:这是一项基于医院的比较观察研究,于2019年5月至2020年5月在印度北部一家三级医院的新生儿病房进行。以所有适合胎龄的新生儿窒息为例,健康新生儿为对照。计算每组80名参与者的样本量。取2ml脐带血样本作为研究中使用的参数。P<0.05具有统计学意义。结果:病例和对照组在性别分布、出生体重、产次和分娩方式方面没有统计学上的显著差异。NRBC和白细胞总数与缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)的严重程度呈正相关,而血红蛋白、红细胞压积和血小板计数无统计学意义。NRBC的受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线下面积为0.812,NRBC计数临界值>20的敏感性为83%,特异性为72%。NRBC 20例或20例以上的总病例中有46%死亡。结论:NRBC与HIE的严重程度呈正相关,与Apgar评分呈负相关。NRBCs值大于或等于20可作为评估出生窒息严重程度和结果的预后标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Standardization of objective structured practical examination in terms of validity and reliability in biochemistry: Our first experience Occupational stress: An impediment to quality nurse–Patient relationship – A rapid review COVID-19 positivity in the COVID suspect and green zones of a large emergency department during the first wave of the pandemic in South India Healthcare-seeking behavior and awareness regarding snakebites and its first-aid management among tribal women in rural Maharashtra Hippocratic oath in dentistry: An insight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1