Investigation of anemia of unknown origin

Q4 Medicine Immunohematology Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.21307/immunohematology-2021-023
L. Castilho, S. Nance, J. Hamilton
{"title":"Investigation of anemia of unknown origin","authors":"L. Castilho, S. Nance, J. Hamilton","doi":"10.21307/immunohematology-2021-023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One of the most difficult concepts to explain when training immunohematology staff involves the investigation of hemolytic anemias. In the transfusion service and in the immunohematology reference laboratory setting, rapid and efficient investigation can be extremely important for patients with critical anemia requiring transfusion. The flow charts presented here provide possible patient scenarios and a logical sequence for initial and subsequent serologic testing for investigation. A clinical assessment of anemia of unknown origin or the finding of an unresolved positive antibody screen in pre-transfusion patient testing begins the investigational flow process. The testing sequence is predicated on the fact that performing a direct antiglobulin test (DAT) on all patients has a low predictive value and should be reserved for patients with unexplained anemia. The process begins with assessing the results of DATs with anti-IgG and anti-C3. Subsequent charts A, B, and C aid in investigating these results. Flow Chart A is for the investigation of warm or cold autoantibody, Chart B is for the investigation of cold-agglutinin or drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia, and Chart C is for the investigation of autoantibody in the transfused patient. While the most common approaches to the initial and subsequent test results are in these flow charts, the charts are not inclusive of all possible diagnoses or presentations. These flow charts are meant to be a guide to assist the laboratory in developing a standard approach to efficient investigation and resolution in patients with unexplained anemia.","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"37 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2021-023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract One of the most difficult concepts to explain when training immunohematology staff involves the investigation of hemolytic anemias. In the transfusion service and in the immunohematology reference laboratory setting, rapid and efficient investigation can be extremely important for patients with critical anemia requiring transfusion. The flow charts presented here provide possible patient scenarios and a logical sequence for initial and subsequent serologic testing for investigation. A clinical assessment of anemia of unknown origin or the finding of an unresolved positive antibody screen in pre-transfusion patient testing begins the investigational flow process. The testing sequence is predicated on the fact that performing a direct antiglobulin test (DAT) on all patients has a low predictive value and should be reserved for patients with unexplained anemia. The process begins with assessing the results of DATs with anti-IgG and anti-C3. Subsequent charts A, B, and C aid in investigating these results. Flow Chart A is for the investigation of warm or cold autoantibody, Chart B is for the investigation of cold-agglutinin or drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia, and Chart C is for the investigation of autoantibody in the transfused patient. While the most common approaches to the initial and subsequent test results are in these flow charts, the charts are not inclusive of all possible diagnoses or presentations. These flow charts are meant to be a guide to assist the laboratory in developing a standard approach to efficient investigation and resolution in patients with unexplained anemia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不明原因贫血的调查
摘要在培训免疫血液学工作人员时,最难解释的概念之一涉及溶血性贫血的调查。在输血服务和免疫血液学参考实验室环境中,快速有效的调查对于需要输血的危重贫血患者来说极其重要。这里提供的流程图提供了可能的患者场景和初步和后续血清学检测的逻辑顺序,以供调查。对不明原因贫血的临床评估或在输血前患者检测中发现未解决的阳性抗体筛查开始了研究流程。测试序列是基于这样一个事实,即对所有患者进行直接抗球蛋白测试(DAT)的预测值较低,应保留给不明原因贫血的患者。该过程从用抗IgG和抗C3评估DAT的结果开始。随后的图表A、B和C有助于调查这些结果。流程图A用于研究温性或冷性自身抗体,图B用于研究冷凝集素或药物诱导的免疫性溶血性贫血,图C用于研究输血患者的自身抗体。虽然对初始和后续测试结果最常见的方法是在这些流程图中,但这些图表并不包括所有可能的诊断或演示。这些流程图旨在帮助实验室制定一种标准方法,对不明原因贫血患者进行有效的调查和解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
A challenging case of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to anti-Ku in a K0 (Kellnull) mother. Mixed-field ABO front typing as an early sign of disease recurrence in ABO-matched stem cell transplantation. Red blood cell extended antigen typing in Omani patients with sickle cell disease to enhance daily transfusion practice. The American Rare Donor Program: 25 years supporting rare blood needs. Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1