Comparison of the relations between three dimensional personality frameworks and intra- and inter-personal functioning

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104416
Zahra Chamandoost , Minoo Jananeh , Leila Sadeghi , Saeid Komasi , Joshua Oltmanns
{"title":"Comparison of the relations between three dimensional personality frameworks and intra- and inter-personal functioning","authors":"Zahra Chamandoost ,&nbsp;Minoo Jananeh ,&nbsp;Leila Sadeghi ,&nbsp;Saeid Komasi ,&nbsp;Joshua Oltmanns","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We aimed to understand which of the three personality frameworks including Criterion B of the DSM-5 model, Five-Factor Model (FFM), and affective temperaments was most overlapping with both intrapersonal and interpersonal dysfunctions (Criterion A). This cross-sectional study consisted of <em>N</em> = 496 people from western Iran. Pearson correlation and regression techniques were used for data analysis. Although all dimensional personality frameworks were related to both personality dysfunctions, Criterion B was a stronger predictor above and beyond the other frameworks. Our findings do not support the replacement of Criterion B by traditional personality and temperament constructs. The significant incremental validity of both the FFM and affective temperaments beyond the DSM-5 model addresses potential complementary constructs to enhance Criterion B to explain Criterion A.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656623000788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to understand which of the three personality frameworks including Criterion B of the DSM-5 model, Five-Factor Model (FFM), and affective temperaments was most overlapping with both intrapersonal and interpersonal dysfunctions (Criterion A). This cross-sectional study consisted of N = 496 people from western Iran. Pearson correlation and regression techniques were used for data analysis. Although all dimensional personality frameworks were related to both personality dysfunctions, Criterion B was a stronger predictor above and beyond the other frameworks. Our findings do not support the replacement of Criterion B by traditional personality and temperament constructs. The significant incremental validity of both the FFM and affective temperaments beyond the DSM-5 model addresses potential complementary constructs to enhance Criterion B to explain Criterion A.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维人格框架与人格内、人际功能关系的比较
我们旨在了解DSM-5模型的标准B、五因素模型(FFM)和情感气质三种人格框架中哪一种与个人和人际功能障碍最重叠(标准A)。这项横断面研究由来自伊朗西部的N=496人组成。数据分析采用Pearson相关和回归技术。尽管所有维度的人格框架都与这两种人格功能障碍有关,但标准B是一个比其他框架更强的预测因子。我们的研究结果并不支持用传统的人格和气质结构来取代标准B。在DSM-5模型之外,FFM和情感气质的显著增量有效性解决了潜在的互补结构,以增强标准B来解释标准A。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
期刊最新文献
Agentic collective narcissism and communal collective narcissism: Do they predict COVID-19 pandemic-related beliefs and behaviors? Optimism and pessimism were prospectively associated with adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic Age and gender differences in the value development of Dutch adults in 11 years of longitudinal data An investigation testing the perceptual advantage of Sensory Processing Sensitivity and its associations with the Big Five personality traits Self/observer agreement in personality assessment by observers’ relationship types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1