‘K is for Keeper’: the roles and representations of the English gamekeeper, c. 1880–1914

IF 0.3 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Rural History-Economy Society Culture Pub Date : 2021-12-13 DOI:10.1017/S0956793321000236
Stephen Ridgwell
{"title":"‘K is for Keeper’: the roles and representations of the English gamekeeper, c. 1880–1914","authors":"Stephen Ridgwell","doi":"10.1017/S0956793321000236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The gamekeeper was an important but controversial presence in the late Victorian and Edwardian countryside. Admired by some for his skills in woodcraft and deep understanding of nature, for others the keeper was much less benign: a destroyer of wildlife; a barrier against wider public access to the land; and the upholder of fiercely contested laws. At a time when debates about the land and its present and future use formed a major part of contemporary political discourse, and when an urbanising society was investing ever more meaning in its idea of the rural, consideration of the keeper takes us beyond the study of field sports towards broader histories of the English countryside and its attendant ruralist culture. Situating the keeper in a dual setting of material production and recreational service provision, the following examines both what he did and was expected to do, and the ways in which this was represented. Not only were keepers active agents in their own representation, eager to project themselves as skilled professionals, they might also elicit support from unusual quarters. As will be seen, keeper representation was as varied as his many roles.","PeriodicalId":44300,"journal":{"name":"Rural History-Economy Society Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural History-Economy Society Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956793321000236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The gamekeeper was an important but controversial presence in the late Victorian and Edwardian countryside. Admired by some for his skills in woodcraft and deep understanding of nature, for others the keeper was much less benign: a destroyer of wildlife; a barrier against wider public access to the land; and the upholder of fiercely contested laws. At a time when debates about the land and its present and future use formed a major part of contemporary political discourse, and when an urbanising society was investing ever more meaning in its idea of the rural, consideration of the keeper takes us beyond the study of field sports towards broader histories of the English countryside and its attendant ruralist culture. Situating the keeper in a dual setting of material production and recreational service provision, the following examines both what he did and was expected to do, and the ways in which this was represented. Not only were keepers active agents in their own representation, eager to project themselves as skilled professionals, they might also elicit support from unusual quarters. As will be seen, keeper representation was as varied as his many roles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“K是守门员”:1880-1914年间英国猎场守门员的角色和表现
在维多利亚时代晚期和爱德华时代的乡村,猎场看守人是一个重要但有争议的存在。一些人钦佩他的木工技术和对自然的深刻理解,而另一些人则不那么友善:他是野生动物的破坏者;阻止更多公众进入土地的屏障;也是激烈争议法律的支持者。当关于土地及其现在和未来用途的辩论成为当代政治话语的主要部分时,当一个城市化的社会对农村的概念投入更多的意义时,对饲养者的考虑使我们超越了对田野运动的研究,走向更广泛的英国乡村历史及其伴随的乡村文化。将守门员置于物质生产和娱乐服务提供的双重环境中,下面将检查他所做的和被期望做的事情,以及这一点的表现方式。饲养员不仅是自己代表的积极代理人,渴望把自己塑造成熟练的专业人员,他们还可能获得不寻常群体的支持。正如我们所看到的,门将的表现和他的角色一样多样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Rural History is well known as a stimulating forum for interdisciplinary exchange. Its definition of rural history ignores traditional subject boundaries to encourage the cross-fertilisation that is essential for an understanding of rural society. It stimulates original scholarship and provides access to the best of recent research. While concentrating on the English-speaking world and Europe, the journal is not limited in geographical coverage. Subject areas include: agricultural history; historical ecology; folklore; popular culture and religion; rural literature; landscape history, archaeology and material culture; vernacular architecture; ethnography, anthropology and rural sociology; the study of women in rural societies.
期刊最新文献
Pre-industrial ‘charity land’ and the dynamics of rural poverty in south-west England, 1656–1739: a case study The ‘pheasant of the future’: Encountering and imagining Reeves’ pheasant in Britain, 1831 – 1913 RUH volume 34 issue 2 Cover and Back matter RUH volume 34 issue 2 Cover and Front matter A Rebato: Popular uprisings and the striking of the bells in eighteenth-century Castile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1