Sufficiency of Teachers’ Access to Resources and Supports for Students With Disabilities

IF 1.9 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teacher Education and Special Education Pub Date : 2021-10-09 DOI:10.1177/08884064211046237
Samantha A. Gesel, Lindsay Foreman-Murray, Allison F. Gilmour
{"title":"Sufficiency of Teachers’ Access to Resources and Supports for Students With Disabilities","authors":"Samantha A. Gesel, Lindsay Foreman-Murray, Allison F. Gilmour","doi":"10.1177/08884064211046237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students with disabilities are served by both special and general educators, yet teachers often feel unprepared to meet the needs of these students in their classrooms. Using data from a nationally representative survey, we examined the sufficiency of teachers’ access to supports available for meeting the needs of students with high-incidence disabilities, their access to development opportunities, and the sources teachers used to access interventions. We explored differences in teachers’ experiences by grade band, service delivery model, and teacher preparation model. We found teachers of students with disabilities rated the sufficiency of access to supports between somewhat insufficient and somewhat sufficient, with the lowest ratings for planning/release time and training and information. Teachers reported greater rates of access to collaboration than professional development. Colleagues were sources for resources related to academic interventions and administrators were sources for nonacademic intervention resources. There were few significant differences in these results by teacher characteristics.","PeriodicalId":51596,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Education and Special Education","volume":"45 1","pages":"204 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Education and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211046237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Students with disabilities are served by both special and general educators, yet teachers often feel unprepared to meet the needs of these students in their classrooms. Using data from a nationally representative survey, we examined the sufficiency of teachers’ access to supports available for meeting the needs of students with high-incidence disabilities, their access to development opportunities, and the sources teachers used to access interventions. We explored differences in teachers’ experiences by grade band, service delivery model, and teacher preparation model. We found teachers of students with disabilities rated the sufficiency of access to supports between somewhat insufficient and somewhat sufficient, with the lowest ratings for planning/release time and training and information. Teachers reported greater rates of access to collaboration than professional development. Colleagues were sources for resources related to academic interventions and administrators were sources for nonacademic intervention resources. There were few significant differences in these results by teacher characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师为残疾学生获得资源和支持的充分性
残疾学生由特殊教育工作者和普通教育工作者提供服务,但教师往往感到没有做好准备,无法在课堂上满足这些学生的需求。利用一项具有全国代表性的调查数据,我们检查了教师获得支持的充分性,以满足高发病率残疾学生的需求,他们获得发展机会的机会,以及教师用于获得干预措施的来源。我们通过年级划分、服务提供模式和教师准备模式探讨了教师体验的差异。我们发现,残疾学生的教师对获得支持的充分性的评分在有些不足和有些不足之间,在计划/发布时间、培训和信息方面的评分最低。教师们报告说,与专业发展相比,获得合作的比率更高。同事是学术干预相关资源的来源,管理人员是非学术干预资源的来源。这些结果在教师特征方面几乎没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teacher Education and Special Education
Teacher Education and Special Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Setting the Stage for a New Prologue Effects of Online Tiered Training to Increase Teachers’ Use of Positive Behavior Supports Supporting Paraeducators and their Use of Active Supervision at Recess: An Exploratory Study Assessing the Performance of Teachers of Students With Significant Disabilities: Establishing Content Validity for the TRAIT-SD Special Educators’ Training and Preparedness to Write Individualized Education Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1