Vom Gast zum Gastwirt? Türkische Arbeitswelten in West-Berlin by Stefan Zeppenfeld (review)

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES German Studies Review Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1353/gsr.2022.0057
Michelle Lynn Kahn
{"title":"Vom Gast zum Gastwirt? Türkische Arbeitswelten in West-Berlin by Stefan Zeppenfeld (review)","authors":"Michelle Lynn Kahn","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2022.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"factor was travel. While women living in East Germany were constrained in their ability to travel, especially after 1961, those living in West Germany were able to indulge in international travel. To a large degree, Leask allows the women who contributed to the Rundbrief to drive the book’s content. Given that these women engaged in self-censorship, worried about the prying eyes of the Stasi, and were not all intimate friends, this reality means that, as readers, we can only discover what these women were comfortable sharing with the larger group. We are not privy to their most intimate thoughts and opinions. Moreover, it is not until the 1980s, when one member of the group reconnected with a Jewish classmate, that Leask introduces the topic of Schönbeck’s Jewish population during the Third Reich. He notes that, for the most part, “the Schönebeck women created a narrative where certain things could not be talked or written about,” including the Nazi past (297). These women’s silences about their Nazi past highlights one aspect of Leask’s methodology that could be clearer: the content of the interviews he conducted with some of these women and how and when they inform his analysis. He states that these interviews were “semi-structured, based on a set of questions I sought to ask all of them” (15). It would be helpful to know what these questions were, if he asked specifically about the Nazi era, and how these conversations influenced his reading of the Rundbrief. Friendship Without Borders is an engaging, highly readable, and deeply interesting book that will be of interest to historians of Modern Germany, women and gender history, and everyday life. Kara Ritzheimer, Oregon State University","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"602 - 604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2022.0057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

factor was travel. While women living in East Germany were constrained in their ability to travel, especially after 1961, those living in West Germany were able to indulge in international travel. To a large degree, Leask allows the women who contributed to the Rundbrief to drive the book’s content. Given that these women engaged in self-censorship, worried about the prying eyes of the Stasi, and were not all intimate friends, this reality means that, as readers, we can only discover what these women were comfortable sharing with the larger group. We are not privy to their most intimate thoughts and opinions. Moreover, it is not until the 1980s, when one member of the group reconnected with a Jewish classmate, that Leask introduces the topic of Schönbeck’s Jewish population during the Third Reich. He notes that, for the most part, “the Schönebeck women created a narrative where certain things could not be talked or written about,” including the Nazi past (297). These women’s silences about their Nazi past highlights one aspect of Leask’s methodology that could be clearer: the content of the interviews he conducted with some of these women and how and when they inform his analysis. He states that these interviews were “semi-structured, based on a set of questions I sought to ask all of them” (15). It would be helpful to know what these questions were, if he asked specifically about the Nazi era, and how these conversations influenced his reading of the Rundbrief. Friendship Without Borders is an engaging, highly readable, and deeply interesting book that will be of interest to historians of Modern Germany, women and gender history, and everyday life. Kara Ritzheimer, Oregon State University
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贵宾到饭店老板?我的评论
原因是旅行。虽然生活在东德的妇女旅行的能力受到限制,特别是在1961年之后,但生活在西德的妇女却能够沉迷于国际旅行。在很大程度上,莱斯克允许那些为《概要》做出贡献的女性来推动这本书的内容。考虑到这些女性从事自我审查,担心史塔西(Stasi)的窥探,而且并非都是亲密的朋友,这一现实意味着,作为读者,我们只能发现这些女性愿意与更大的群体分享的东西。我们不知道他们最私密的想法和意见。此外,直到20世纪80年代,当该组织的一名成员与一位犹太同学重新联系时,列斯克才引入了第三帝国时期Schönbeck犹太人口的话题。他指出,在很大程度上,“Schönebeck女性创造了一种叙事,其中某些事情不能被谈论或写出来,”包括纳粹的过去(297)。这些女性对纳粹历史的沉默凸显了列斯克方法论的一个方面,这个方面可能更清晰:他对其中一些女性进行的访谈内容,以及这些访谈是如何以及何时为他的分析提供信息的。他说,这些采访是“半结构化的,基于我试图问他们所有人的一系列问题”(15)。如果他特别问及纳粹时代,以及这些谈话如何影响了他对《伦德简报》的解读,那么了解这些问题是什么将会很有帮助。《友谊无国界》是一本引人入胜、可读性强、非常有趣的书,研究现代德国、女性和性别史以及日常生活的历史学家都会对它感兴趣。卡拉·里茨海默,俄勒冈州立大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊最新文献
Demokratisierung nach Auschwitz: Eine Geschichte der westdeutschen Sozialwissenschaften in der Nachkriegszeit by Fabian Link (review) Plants, Places, and Power: Toward Social and Ecological Justice in German Literature and Film by Maria Stehle (review) The Philology of Life: Walter Benjamin's Critical Program by Kevin McLaughlin (review) Vor hundert Jahren: Coudenhove-Kalergis Pan-Europa —der Traum von einer demokratischen Weltmacht als Friedensstifter Erasures and Eradications in Modern Viennese Art, Architecture and Design ed. by Megan Brandow-Faller and Laura Morowitz (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1