Rights of the Child in the Child Justice System

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Youth Justice-An International Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1177/14732254231185820
U. Kilkelly, Stefaan Pleysier
{"title":"Rights of the Child in the Child Justice System","authors":"U. Kilkelly, Stefaan Pleysier","doi":"10.1177/14732254231185820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is now several decades since the United Nations and other international bodies began to develop standards in relation to the protection of children’s rights in the child justice system. The adoption of the Beijing Rules (the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice) by the United Nations in 1985 represented an early milestone in the establishment of a progressive rights-based approach to children in conflict with the law. In 1989, the rights-based approach to youth justice became enshrined as binding international law with the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Article 1 of the CRC makes clear that all children under 18 years are entitled to protection of their rights and under Article 3, the child’s best interests must be a primary consideration in all actions concerning the child whether taken by private or public bodies or welfare institutions. Together with the CRC’s other general principles – Article 2 which prohibits discrimination in the enjoyment of Convention rights, Article 6 which provides for the child’s right to development, and Article 12 which requires states to assure to children the right to a say in matters that affect them – the Convention establishes that children are entitled to decision-making that is child-centred, non-discriminatory and informed both by children’s development and their views. In its first General Comment on the matter, the Committee on the Rights of the Child (the Committee), the body that monitors implementation of the CRC, made clear that states parties are required to apply these general principles systematically in the administration of child justice (Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2007, para. 5). In addition to these general children’s rights principles, Articles 37 and 40 of the CRC set out a number of more specific provisions relevant to children in conflict with the law. Most importantly, Article 40(1) provides that states parties to the Convention recognise the right of every child:","PeriodicalId":45886,"journal":{"name":"Youth Justice-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth Justice-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14732254231185820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is now several decades since the United Nations and other international bodies began to develop standards in relation to the protection of children’s rights in the child justice system. The adoption of the Beijing Rules (the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice) by the United Nations in 1985 represented an early milestone in the establishment of a progressive rights-based approach to children in conflict with the law. In 1989, the rights-based approach to youth justice became enshrined as binding international law with the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Article 1 of the CRC makes clear that all children under 18 years are entitled to protection of their rights and under Article 3, the child’s best interests must be a primary consideration in all actions concerning the child whether taken by private or public bodies or welfare institutions. Together with the CRC’s other general principles – Article 2 which prohibits discrimination in the enjoyment of Convention rights, Article 6 which provides for the child’s right to development, and Article 12 which requires states to assure to children the right to a say in matters that affect them – the Convention establishes that children are entitled to decision-making that is child-centred, non-discriminatory and informed both by children’s development and their views. In its first General Comment on the matter, the Committee on the Rights of the Child (the Committee), the body that monitors implementation of the CRC, made clear that states parties are required to apply these general principles systematically in the administration of child justice (Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2007, para. 5). In addition to these general children’s rights principles, Articles 37 and 40 of the CRC set out a number of more specific provisions relevant to children in conflict with the law. Most importantly, Article 40(1) provides that states parties to the Convention recognise the right of every child:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童司法制度中的儿童权利
几十年前,联合国和其他国际机构开始制定儿童司法系统中保护儿童权利的标准。1985年,联合国通过了《北京规则》(《联合国少年司法最低限度标准规则》),这是对触犯法律的儿童采取基于权利的渐进办法的一个早期里程碑。1989年,随着《联合国儿童权利公约》的通过,以权利为基础的青年司法方法成为具有约束力的国际法。《儿童权利公约》第1条明确规定,所有18岁以下的儿童都有权得到其权利的保护,根据第3条,在所有涉及儿童的行动中,无论是私人机构、公共机构还是福利机构,都必须将儿童的最大利益作为首要考虑因素。连同《儿童权利公约》的其他一般原则——第2条禁止在享受《公约》权利方面的歧视,第6条规定儿童的发展权,以及第12条,其中要求各国保证儿童在影响他们的事务中有发言权——《公约》规定,儿童有权做出以儿童为中心、非歧视性的决策,并根据儿童的发展和他们的观点作出决定。监督《儿童权利公约》执行情况的儿童权利委员会(委员会)在其关于此事的第一份一般性意见中明确表示,缔约国必须在儿童司法中系统地适用这些一般性原则(儿童权利委员会,2007年,第5段)。除了这些一般的儿童权利原则外,《儿童权利公约》第37条和第40条还规定了一些与触犯法律的儿童有关的更具体的规定。最重要的是,第40条第(1)款规定,《公约》缔约国承认每个儿童的权利:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Youth Justice-An International Journal
Youth Justice-An International Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Youth Justice is an international, peer-reviewed journal that engages with the analyses of juvenile/youth justice systems, law, policy and practice around the world. It contains articles that are theoretically informed and/or grounded in the latest empirical research. Youth Justice has established itself as the leading journal in the field in the UK, and, supported by an editorial board comprising some of the world"s leading youth justice scholars.
期刊最新文献
The Youth Justice Commute (or the Institutional Construction of Youth Transport Poverty) Overcoming ‘Sheriff Syndrome’: Exploring Young Adults’ Experiences of Policing in Northern Ireland The Right to Participation in Youth Justice Research ‘Won the Battle but Lost the War?’ ‘County Lines’ and the Quest for Victim Status: Reflections and Challenges The Child First Strategy Implementation Project – Translating Strategy Into Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1