The globalization of TikTok: Strategies, governance and geopolitics

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Digital Media & Policy Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1386/jdmp_00062_1
Lianrui Jia, Fan Liang
{"title":"The globalization of TikTok: Strategies, governance and geopolitics","authors":"Lianrui Jia, Fan Liang","doi":"10.1386/jdmp_00062_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the rise of TikTok in three aspects: globalization strategies, data and content policies, and geopolitical implications. Instead of focusing on app features and uses within the platform proper, we situate and critically analyse TikTok as a platform business in\n a global media policy and governance context. We first unpack TikTok’s platformization process, tracing how TikTok gradually diversifies its business models and platform affordances to serve multisided markets. To understand TikTok’s platform governance, we systematically analyse\n and compare its data and content policies for different regions. Crucial to its global expansion, we then look at TikTok’s lobbying efforts to maintain government relations and corporate responses after facing multiple regulatory probing by various national governments. TikTok’s\n case epitomizes problems and challenges faced by a slew of globalizing Chinese digital platforms in increasingly contested geopolitics that cut across the chasms and fault lines between the rise of China and India as emergent powers in the US-dominated global platform ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":40702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Media & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Media & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00062_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This article examines the rise of TikTok in three aspects: globalization strategies, data and content policies, and geopolitical implications. Instead of focusing on app features and uses within the platform proper, we situate and critically analyse TikTok as a platform business in a global media policy and governance context. We first unpack TikTok’s platformization process, tracing how TikTok gradually diversifies its business models and platform affordances to serve multisided markets. To understand TikTok’s platform governance, we systematically analyse and compare its data and content policies for different regions. Crucial to its global expansion, we then look at TikTok’s lobbying efforts to maintain government relations and corporate responses after facing multiple regulatory probing by various national governments. TikTok’s case epitomizes problems and challenges faced by a slew of globalizing Chinese digital platforms in increasingly contested geopolitics that cut across the chasms and fault lines between the rise of China and India as emergent powers in the US-dominated global platform ecosystem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抖音的全球化:战略、治理和地缘政治
本文从三个方面考察了TikTok的崛起:全球化战略、数据和内容政策以及地缘政治影响。我们没有关注平台内的应用程序功能和使用,而是将TikTok作为一种平台业务,置于全球媒体政策和治理背景下进行批判性分析。我们首先分析了TikTok的平台化过程,追踪了TikTok如何逐渐多样化其商业模式和平台可供性,以服务于多边市场。为了了解TikTok的平台治理,我们系统地分析和比较了不同地区的数据和内容政策。对其全球扩张至关重要的是,在面临各国政府的多重监管调查后,我们来看看TikTok为维持政府关系和企业反应所做的游说努力。TikTok的案件集中体现了一系列全球化的中国数字平台在日益激烈的地缘政治中所面临的问题和挑战,这些地缘政治跨越了中国和印度作为美国主导的全球平台生态系统中新兴大国崛起之间的鸿沟和断层线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The concept of ‘new media’ among Jordanian news producers Digital disruption and global businesses’ viability under COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic Platform governance and the politics of media regulation: The review of the European Audiovisual Media Services Directive Intermediary roles in the transposition of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive into domestic legislation: Evidence from Spain European audiovisual media policy in the age of global video on demand services: A case study of Netflix in the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1