Development of a Framework on Prohibition of Adulterating Surimi Products with Animal Plasma: A Qualitative Research Approach

Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.17576/islamiyyat-2022-4402-01
Siti Jamilah Mohd Sukri, Nurrulhidayah Ahmad Fadzlillah, Mustafa Mat Jubri @ Shamsuddin, Abdul Rohman
{"title":"Development of a Framework on Prohibition of Adulterating Surimi Products with Animal Plasma: A Qualitative Research Approach","authors":"Siti Jamilah Mohd Sukri, Nurrulhidayah Ahmad Fadzlillah, Mustafa Mat Jubri @ Shamsuddin, Abdul Rohman","doi":"10.17576/islamiyyat-2022-4402-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adulteration of commercial food products with muharramat (prohibited) ingredients exposes Muslims of the present time to food fraud. One of the muharramat sources is animal plasma food grade powder in surimi products. This adulteration using prohibited substance is regarded as a critical halal issue that should be addressed to strengthen the justification for its prohibited status. The current study employs a qualitative approach using semi-structured interview data with Shariah experts, Halal executives, and food technologists as the main source of data collection, and a literature review as supportive argument. The application of thematic analysis to analyze the collected data enabled the identification of the main themes and sub-themes of the interview data. Based on the results, the identified main themes are: the principles of Istihlak fasidah (imperfect transformation), Istishab (presumption of continuity), and Maslahah (preservation of public interest); while the identified several sub-themes are: the involvement of human intervention, the residual traces of animal plasma properties in/the end product, and the prohibition of spilled-out blood that is attributed to all of the blood components, as supportive arguments to justify the reasons for Istihlak fasidah (imperfect transformation) process. Last but not least, several principles of Qawaid Fiqhiyyah (Islamic Legal Maxim) become part of the identified sub-themes applied by the interviewees to enhance the prohibited status. Subsequently, a framework is presented to visually present the data to clarify the interrelatedness of the identified themes. The research findings can potentially contribute signigicant knowledge to the Contemporary Fiqh Consumerism field, particularly in understanding the issue of intentionally adulterating halal with non-halal sources. The developed framework also meets the criteria of future new research since no comprehensive study has been conducted to highlight the prohibition of using animal plasma in food products.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2022-4402-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adulteration of commercial food products with muharramat (prohibited) ingredients exposes Muslims of the present time to food fraud. One of the muharramat sources is animal plasma food grade powder in surimi products. This adulteration using prohibited substance is regarded as a critical halal issue that should be addressed to strengthen the justification for its prohibited status. The current study employs a qualitative approach using semi-structured interview data with Shariah experts, Halal executives, and food technologists as the main source of data collection, and a literature review as supportive argument. The application of thematic analysis to analyze the collected data enabled the identification of the main themes and sub-themes of the interview data. Based on the results, the identified main themes are: the principles of Istihlak fasidah (imperfect transformation), Istishab (presumption of continuity), and Maslahah (preservation of public interest); while the identified several sub-themes are: the involvement of human intervention, the residual traces of animal plasma properties in/the end product, and the prohibition of spilled-out blood that is attributed to all of the blood components, as supportive arguments to justify the reasons for Istihlak fasidah (imperfect transformation) process. Last but not least, several principles of Qawaid Fiqhiyyah (Islamic Legal Maxim) become part of the identified sub-themes applied by the interviewees to enhance the prohibited status. Subsequently, a framework is presented to visually present the data to clarify the interrelatedness of the identified themes. The research findings can potentially contribute signigicant knowledge to the Contemporary Fiqh Consumerism field, particularly in understanding the issue of intentionally adulterating halal with non-halal sources. The developed framework also meets the criteria of future new research since no comprehensive study has been conducted to highlight the prohibition of using animal plasma in food products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
禁止动物血浆掺入鱼糜制品框架的制定:定性研究方法
在商业食品中掺入禁止的成分使现在的穆斯林面临食品欺诈。动物血浆食品级粉是鱼糜制品中的主要来源之一。这种使用禁用物质的掺假被认为是一个关键的清真问题,应该加以解决,以加强其禁用状态的理由。目前的研究采用定性方法,使用与伊斯兰教专家、清真行政人员和食品技术人员的半结构化访谈数据作为数据收集的主要来源,并通过文献综述作为支持论点。运用专题分析的方法对收集到的数据进行分析,从而确定访谈数据的主要主题和次要主题。根据结果,确定的主要主题是:Istihlak fasidah(不完善的转变),Istishab(连续性的假设)和Maslahah(维护公共利益)的原则;而确定的几个子主题是:人为干预的参与,最终产品中动物血浆特性的残留痕迹,以及禁止归因于所有血液成分的溢出血液,作为证明Istihlak fasidah(不完美转化)过程的理由的支持性论据。最后但并非最不重要的是,Qawaid Fiqhiyyah(伊斯兰法律格言)的几个原则成为被采访者用来提高被禁地位的确定的子主题的一部分。随后,提出了一个框架,以直观地呈现数据,以澄清已确定主题的相互关系。研究结果可以潜在地为当代伊斯兰教消费主义领域贡献重要的知识,特别是在理解故意将清真与非清真来源掺假的问题方面。开发的框架也符合未来新研究的标准,因为没有进行全面的研究来强调禁止在食品中使用动物血浆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1