Comparative Analysis of Combustion of Qualified Composite Fuel for the Transitional Period in the Household and Communal Sector in Poland

IF 1.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Management Systems in Production Engineering Pub Date : 2022-10-29 DOI:10.2478/mspe-2022-0046
M. Bembenek, Tomasz Dzik, Jarosław Smyła, A. Kozłowski, P. Wojtas
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Combustion of Qualified Composite Fuel for the Transitional Period in the Household and Communal Sector in Poland","authors":"M. Bembenek, Tomasz Dzik, Jarosław Smyła, A. Kozłowski, P. Wojtas","doi":"10.2478/mspe-2022-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article presents the results of laboratory combustion tests of the microbriquette obtained from useless coal (grain class of < 5 mm) generated in the production of “eco-pea” (eko-groszek) coal. The briquettes of 1.5 and 2.5 cm3 were made in a roller press of crushed coal granulation down to 2 mm, mixed with a binder and/or catalytic additives and sorbents, then dried to final moisture of about 7%. The tests were carried out on a specially designed stand enabling to determine the differential curve of the weight loss of samples heated to the ignition temperature and then burnt with laminar airflow by natural chimney draft. Comparative tests were carried out with ecopea coal from the “ZG Sobieski” mine. The results indicate that composite fuels, in the form of microbriquette, ignite faster, burn at a higher temperature and leave less ash when burned than lump coal. The greater reactivity of the briquette concerning the lump coal allows for minimizing the air rate by about 10%, which also reduces the exhaust gas volume by the same amount and the stack losses. It reduces the velocity of dust lifting, which leads to the reduction of their emission.","PeriodicalId":44097,"journal":{"name":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article presents the results of laboratory combustion tests of the microbriquette obtained from useless coal (grain class of < 5 mm) generated in the production of “eco-pea” (eko-groszek) coal. The briquettes of 1.5 and 2.5 cm3 were made in a roller press of crushed coal granulation down to 2 mm, mixed with a binder and/or catalytic additives and sorbents, then dried to final moisture of about 7%. The tests were carried out on a specially designed stand enabling to determine the differential curve of the weight loss of samples heated to the ignition temperature and then burnt with laminar airflow by natural chimney draft. Comparative tests were carried out with ecopea coal from the “ZG Sobieski” mine. The results indicate that composite fuels, in the form of microbriquette, ignite faster, burn at a higher temperature and leave less ash when burned than lump coal. The greater reactivity of the briquette concerning the lump coal allows for minimizing the air rate by about 10%, which also reduces the exhaust gas volume by the same amount and the stack losses. It reduces the velocity of dust lifting, which leads to the reduction of their emission.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰家庭和公共部门过渡时期合格复合燃料燃烧的比较分析
摘要本文介绍了“生态豌豆”(eko-groszek)煤生产过程中产生的废煤(颗粒级< 5mm)制备的微型煤的室内燃烧试验结果。将粉碎后的煤制粒至2mm,在辊压机中制成1.5和2.5 cm3的型煤,与粘合剂和/或催化添加剂和吸附剂混合,然后干燥至最终水分约为7%。试验是在一个专门设计的支架上进行的,该支架可以确定样品被加热到点火温度,然后在自然烟囱气流的层流下燃烧的失重差曲线。与“ZG Sobieski”煤矿的ecopea煤进行了对比试验。结果表明,与块煤相比,微型煤形式的复合燃料燃烧速度快,燃烧温度高,燃烧时留下的灰分少。对于块煤,型煤的较大反应性允许将空气率最小化约10%,这也减少了相同数量的废气量和堆损。它降低了粉尘提升的速度,从而减少了粉尘的排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Possibility of Modeling Gas Separators using Computational Fluid Dynamics Process of Incubators in Morocco: Overview of the “Forsa” Program Research of Green Innovation of Companies of Countries with Different Levels of Technological Development of Production Work-Life Balance in SME Sector and Large Enterprises Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review in Social Manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1