Privacy policies, cross-border health data and the GDPR

T. Mulder, M. Tudorica
{"title":"Privacy policies, cross-border health data and the GDPR","authors":"T. Mulder, M. Tudorica","doi":"10.1080/13600834.2019.1644068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research going back to 2008 has shown that a vast majority of the people never read privacy policies (AM McDonald and LF Cranor, ‘The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies’ (2008) 4A JLPI 543). Since then, not a lot has changed (F Schaub and others, ‘Designing Effective Privacy Notices and Controls’ (2017) 99 IEEE 70). Most people formally consent to privacy policies without knowing what happens to their personal data. This odd situation is called the privacy paradox: while people highly value their fundamental right to privacy, they do not act accordingly, especially when it concerns new technologies (M Taddicken, ‘The “Privacy Paradox” in the Social Web’ (2013) 19 JCMC 248). Since more and more people use apps on their mobile phones and wearables to measure their health, it is important to do research in this area. Nowadays, privacy is a popular news item; this might be why more and more companies use privacy both in their business models and as a marketing tool. This raises the question whether people really give ‘informed consent’ to privacy policies, as they seem to rely on marketing statements rather than reading the actual privacy policies themselves.","PeriodicalId":44342,"journal":{"name":"Information & Communications Technology Law","volume":"28 1","pages":"261 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600834.2019.1644068","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Communications Technology Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1644068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research going back to 2008 has shown that a vast majority of the people never read privacy policies (AM McDonald and LF Cranor, ‘The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies’ (2008) 4A JLPI 543). Since then, not a lot has changed (F Schaub and others, ‘Designing Effective Privacy Notices and Controls’ (2017) 99 IEEE 70). Most people formally consent to privacy policies without knowing what happens to their personal data. This odd situation is called the privacy paradox: while people highly value their fundamental right to privacy, they do not act accordingly, especially when it concerns new technologies (M Taddicken, ‘The “Privacy Paradox” in the Social Web’ (2013) 19 JCMC 248). Since more and more people use apps on their mobile phones and wearables to measure their health, it is important to do research in this area. Nowadays, privacy is a popular news item; this might be why more and more companies use privacy both in their business models and as a marketing tool. This raises the question whether people really give ‘informed consent’ to privacy policies, as they seem to rely on marketing statements rather than reading the actual privacy policies themselves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐私政策、跨境健康数据和GDPR
摘要2008年的研究表明,绝大多数人从未阅读过隐私政策(AM McDonald和LF Cranor,“阅读隐私政策的成本”(2008)4A JLPI 543)。从那时起,没有太大变化(F Schaub等人,“设计有效的隐私声明和控制”(2017)99 IEEE 70)。大多数人在不知道自己的个人数据会发生什么的情况下正式同意隐私政策。这种奇怪的情况被称为隐私悖论:尽管人们高度重视自己的基本隐私权,但他们并没有采取相应的行动,尤其是在涉及新技术时(M Taddicken,“社交网络中的“隐私悖论”(2013)19 JCMC 248)。由于越来越多的人在手机和可穿戴设备上使用应用程序来衡量自己的健康状况,因此在这方面进行研究很重要。如今,隐私是一个流行的新闻项目;这可能就是为什么越来越多的公司在商业模式和营销工具中都使用隐私的原因。这就提出了一个问题,人们是否真的“知情同意”隐私政策,因为他们似乎依赖于营销声明,而不是自己阅读实际的隐私政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The last decade has seen the introduction of computers and information technology at many levels of human transaction. Information technology (IT) is now used for data collation, in daily commercial transactions like transfer of funds, conclusion of contract, and complex diagnostic purposes in fields such as law, medicine and transport. The use of IT has expanded rapidly with the introduction of multimedia and the Internet. Any new technology inevitably raises a number of questions ranging from the legal to the ethical and the social. Information & Communications Technology Law covers topics such as: the implications of IT for legal processes and legal decision-making and related ethical and social issues.
期刊最新文献
When objects betray you: the Internet of Things and the privilege against self-incrimination From object obfuscation to contextually-dependent identification: enhancing automated privacy protection in street-level image platforms (SLIPs) Balancing the autonomy and protection of children: competency challenges in data protection law Fidelity in legal coding: applying legal translation frameworks to address interpretive challenges The role of corporate social responsibility in the regulation of OTT platforms: the case of film industry and Turkish corporate law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1