Motivations to Act for the Protection of Nature Biodiversity and the Environment: A Matter of “Significance”

IF 5.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Behavior Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1177/0013916518824376
E. Molinario, A. Kruglanski, F. Bonaiuto, M. Bonnes, Lavinia Cicero, F. Fornara, M. Scopelliti, J. Admiraal, A. Beringer, T. Dedeurwaerdere, Wouter deGroot, J. Hiedanpää, P. Knights, L. Knippenberg, Chris Ovdenden, K. Polajnar Horvat, F. Popa, Carmen Porras-Gomez, Aleš Smrekar, N. Soethe, J. Vivero-Pol, R. V. D. van den Born, M. Bonaiuto
{"title":"Motivations to Act for the Protection of Nature Biodiversity and the Environment: A Matter of “Significance”","authors":"E. Molinario, A. Kruglanski, F. Bonaiuto, M. Bonnes, Lavinia Cicero, F. Fornara, M. Scopelliti, J. Admiraal, A. Beringer, T. Dedeurwaerdere, Wouter deGroot, J. Hiedanpää, P. Knights, L. Knippenberg, Chris Ovdenden, K. Polajnar Horvat, F. Popa, Carmen Porras-Gomez, Aleš Smrekar, N. Soethe, J. Vivero-Pol, R. V. D. van den Born, M. Bonaiuto","doi":"10.1177/0013916518824376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental activism, defined as a range of difficult pro-environmental behaviors, is analyzed within the conceptual framework of Significance Quest Theory (SQT). In Study 1, 40 interviews were carried out on two groups of people in the European Union: Committed Actors for Nature (CANs, n = 25) versus Committed Actors for Society (CASs, n = 15). Results demonstrated that Significance Quest (SQ) motivates each group to be strongly committed to their chosen action and the main difference between them being in their ideology (pro-social vs. pro-environmental). In Study 2 (N = 131), the relationship between SQ and intention to enact difficult pro-environmental behaviors was assessed. Results suggested that the higher the SQ, the higher the tendency to enact difficult pro-environmental behaviors, but not average or easy ones. Moreover, the higher the pro-environmental ideology, the stronger the indirect effect of SQ on difficult behavior through willingness to sacrifice.","PeriodicalId":48374,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Behavior","volume":"52 1","pages":"1133 - 1163"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0013916518824376","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518824376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Environmental activism, defined as a range of difficult pro-environmental behaviors, is analyzed within the conceptual framework of Significance Quest Theory (SQT). In Study 1, 40 interviews were carried out on two groups of people in the European Union: Committed Actors for Nature (CANs, n = 25) versus Committed Actors for Society (CASs, n = 15). Results demonstrated that Significance Quest (SQ) motivates each group to be strongly committed to their chosen action and the main difference between them being in their ideology (pro-social vs. pro-environmental). In Study 2 (N = 131), the relationship between SQ and intention to enact difficult pro-environmental behaviors was assessed. Results suggested that the higher the SQ, the higher the tendency to enact difficult pro-environmental behaviors, but not average or easy ones. Moreover, the higher the pro-environmental ideology, the stronger the indirect effect of SQ on difficult behavior through willingness to sacrifice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护自然生物多样性与环境的行动动机:一个“意义”问题
环境激进主义被定义为一系列困难的亲环境行为,在意义探索理论(SQT)的概念框架内进行分析。在研究1中,对欧盟的两组人进行了40次采访:致力于自然的行动者(CAN,n=25)和致力于社会的行动者(CAS,n=15)。结果表明,意义探索(SQ)激励每个群体坚定地致力于他们选择的行动,他们之间的主要区别在于他们的意识形态(亲社会与亲环境)。在研究2中(N=131),评估了SQ与实施困难的环保行为的意图之间的关系。结果表明,SQ越高,实施困难的环保行为的倾向就越高,但不是一般或容易的行为。此外,支持环境的意识形态越高,SQ通过牺牲意愿对困难行为的间接影响就越强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Environment & Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal designed to report rigorous experimental and theoretical work focusing on the influence of the physical environment on human behavior at the individual, group, and institutional levels.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural Applications of the New Ecological Paradigm in Protected Area Contexts Evidence on the Effectiveness-Acceptance Trade-Off Between Forced Active Choice and Default Nudging: A Field Study to Reduce Meat Consumption in Cafeterias Ecological Dominance Orientation as a predictor of Wildlife Value Orientations and Support for Lethal Wildlife Management Psychosocial Determinants of Lyme Disease Preventive Behavior Among Outdoor Recreationists Spatial Optimism and Cross-Over Effects in the Perceptions of Interconnected Wildfire, Flood, and Mudslide Hazards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1