{"title":"Playing Real: Mimesis, Media, and Mischief By Lindsay Brandon Hunter. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2021; pp. xxiv + 162, 1 illustration. $99.95 cloth, $34.95 paper, $34.95 e-book.","authors":"K. Jacobson","doi":"10.1017/S0040557421000338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"in original. 10 See Bruno Latour, “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern,” Critical Inquiry 30.2 (2004): 225–48. 11 Academic debate about this term was triggered by Rustom Bharucha’s essay “Notes on the Invention of Tradition” in his Theatre and the World: Performance and the Politics of Culture (1990; London: Routledge, 1993), 193–211. 12 Dipesh Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (2000; new ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007). 13 These comments are from a podcast of 2018 based on a lecture at Australian National University; see “The Knowledge We Value: Dipesh Chakrabarty Talks the Contentious Politics of Knowledge Production,” The Familiar Strange, 4 February 2018, https://thefamiliarstrange.com/2018/02/04/ep-7-dipesh-chakrabarty/, accessed 17 May 2021. 14 Bernard S. Cohn, “History and Anthropology: The State of Play,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22.2 (1980): 198–221. 15 John London, “The Uncertainty of Fascist Aesthetics: Political Ideology and Historical Reality,” Culture, Theory and Critique 42.1 (1999): 49–63, at 53. 16 Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Climate of History: Four Theses,” Critical Inquiry 35.2 (2009): 197–222. For a pioneering essay in theatre studies, see Bruce McConachie, “Ethics, Evolution, Ecology, and Performance,” in Readings in Performance and Ecology, ed. Wendy Arons and Theresa J. May (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 91–100. The topic is placed on the international theatre studies agenda in Lisa Woynarski et al., “Dossier: Climate Change and the Decolonized Future of Theatre,” Theatre Research International 45.2 (2020): 179–208. 17 See What Is Adaptive about Adaptive Memory?, ed. Bennett L. Schwartz et al. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). 18 Paul Stoller, Sensuous Scholarship (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997), xvi. 19 Robin Nelson, “Practice-as-Research and the Problem of Knowledge,” Performance Research 11.4 (2006): 105–16.","PeriodicalId":42777,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE SURVEY","volume":"62 1","pages":"374 - 376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0040557421000338","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE SURVEY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0040557421000338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
in original. 10 See Bruno Latour, “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern,” Critical Inquiry 30.2 (2004): 225–48. 11 Academic debate about this term was triggered by Rustom Bharucha’s essay “Notes on the Invention of Tradition” in his Theatre and the World: Performance and the Politics of Culture (1990; London: Routledge, 1993), 193–211. 12 Dipesh Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (2000; new ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007). 13 These comments are from a podcast of 2018 based on a lecture at Australian National University; see “The Knowledge We Value: Dipesh Chakrabarty Talks the Contentious Politics of Knowledge Production,” The Familiar Strange, 4 February 2018, https://thefamiliarstrange.com/2018/02/04/ep-7-dipesh-chakrabarty/, accessed 17 May 2021. 14 Bernard S. Cohn, “History and Anthropology: The State of Play,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22.2 (1980): 198–221. 15 John London, “The Uncertainty of Fascist Aesthetics: Political Ideology and Historical Reality,” Culture, Theory and Critique 42.1 (1999): 49–63, at 53. 16 Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Climate of History: Four Theses,” Critical Inquiry 35.2 (2009): 197–222. For a pioneering essay in theatre studies, see Bruce McConachie, “Ethics, Evolution, Ecology, and Performance,” in Readings in Performance and Ecology, ed. Wendy Arons and Theresa J. May (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 91–100. The topic is placed on the international theatre studies agenda in Lisa Woynarski et al., “Dossier: Climate Change and the Decolonized Future of Theatre,” Theatre Research International 45.2 (2020): 179–208. 17 See What Is Adaptive about Adaptive Memory?, ed. Bennett L. Schwartz et al. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). 18 Paul Stoller, Sensuous Scholarship (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997), xvi. 19 Robin Nelson, “Practice-as-Research and the Problem of Knowledge,” Performance Research 11.4 (2006): 105–16.
《Playing Real: Mimesis, Media and Mischief》作者:Lindsay Brandon Hunter埃文斯顿,伊利诺伊州:西北大学出版社,2021;Pp. xxiv + 162, 1插图。布99.95美元,纸34.95美元,电子书34.95美元。
在原始的。10参见布鲁诺·拉图尔的《为什么批评会失去动力?》《从事实问题到关注问题》,《批判性探究》30.2(2004):225-48页。11关于这一术语的学术争论是由Rustom Bharucha在他的《戏剧与世界:表演与文化政治》(1990;伦敦:劳特利奇出版社,1993),193-211。12迪佩什·查克拉巴蒂:《欧洲化:后殖民思想与历史差异》,2000;新版,普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社,2007年)。这些评论来自2018年的一个播客,基于澳大利亚国立大学的一次讲座;见“我们重视的知识:迪佩什·查克拉巴蒂谈知识生产的争议政治”,《熟悉的陌生》,2018年2月4日,https://thefamiliarstrange.com/2018/02/04/ep-7-dipesh-chakrabarty/, 2021年5月17日访问。14 Bernard S. Cohn,“历史与人类学:游戏的状态”,《社会与历史比较研究》22.2(1980):198-221。15约翰·伦敦,“法西斯美学的不确定性:政治意识形态与历史现实”,《文化理论与批判》,1999年第4期,第49-63页,第53页。16迪佩什·查克拉巴蒂,“历史的气候:四个论点”,《批判研究》35.2(2009):197-222。关于戏剧研究的开创性文章,见布鲁斯·麦科纳奇,“伦理、进化、生态和表演”,见《表演与生态学读本》,温迪·阿隆斯和特蕾莎·j·梅主编(纽约:帕尔格雷夫·麦克米伦出版社,2012),第91-100页。该主题被放在国际戏剧研究议程上Lisa Woynarski等人,“档案:气候变化和戏剧的非殖民化未来”,国际戏剧研究45.2(2020):179-208。17参见适应性记忆的适应性是什么?贝内特L.施瓦茨等人编(牛津:牛津大学出版社,2014)。18保罗·斯托勒,感官奖学金(费城:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,1997年),16。19 Robin Nelson,“实践即研究和知识问题”,《绩效研究》11.4(2006):105-16。