Frequency of reoperation in patients who underwent breast reconstruction using Allergan implants after an interview about breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma

Jae Woo Lee, Seung Hyun Kim, Min Wook Kim, Dae Kyun Jeong, S. Bae, Hyun Yul Kim, Y. Jung, K. Choo, K. J. Nam, S. Nam
{"title":"Frequency of reoperation in patients who underwent breast reconstruction using Allergan implants after an interview about breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma","authors":"Jae Woo Lee, Seung Hyun Kim, Min Wook Kim, Dae Kyun Jeong, S. Bae, Hyun Yul Kim, Y. Jung, K. Choo, K. J. Nam, S. Nam","doi":"10.14730/aaps.2021.00178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In recent years, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has emerged as an important concern. At our institution, patients who received breast reconstruction using Allergan implants were informed individually about BIA-ALCL. The present study analyzed correlations between patients’ level of satisfaction with their breast shape and whether they chose to undergo reoperation (implant removal or replacement).Methods Breast reconstruction with Allergan implants was performed between December 2014 and April 2018. In total, 107 patients were interviewed, excluding those who had died, were unreachable, or had already undergone reoperation. The mean follow-up period was 53 months (range, 26–73 months).Results After the interviews, 68 patients postponed reoperation, 29 had their implant replaced, and 10 had their implant removed. Nearly one-fifth (18.9%) of patients who were satisfied with their breast shape (13 out of 69) underwent reoperation due to anxiety over ALCL. Meanwhile, 68.4% of patients who were not satisfied due to capsular contracture or scar contracture (26 out of 38) underwent reoperation. Sixteen of the 30 patients who received postoperative radiotherapy (53.3%) chose to undergo reoperation.Conclusions Satisfaction with the cosmetic outcomes of implant placement played a meaningful role in patients’ decisions to undergo reoperation. This tendency may be linked to postoperative radiotherapy, which is a major contributor to complications such as contracture. Nonetheless, a substantial proportion of patients who were satisfied with the outcomes chose to undergo reoperation due to concerns regarding ALCL.","PeriodicalId":41514,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2021.00178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In recent years, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has emerged as an important concern. At our institution, patients who received breast reconstruction using Allergan implants were informed individually about BIA-ALCL. The present study analyzed correlations between patients’ level of satisfaction with their breast shape and whether they chose to undergo reoperation (implant removal or replacement).Methods Breast reconstruction with Allergan implants was performed between December 2014 and April 2018. In total, 107 patients were interviewed, excluding those who had died, were unreachable, or had already undergone reoperation. The mean follow-up period was 53 months (range, 26–73 months).Results After the interviews, 68 patients postponed reoperation, 29 had their implant replaced, and 10 had their implant removed. Nearly one-fifth (18.9%) of patients who were satisfied with their breast shape (13 out of 69) underwent reoperation due to anxiety over ALCL. Meanwhile, 68.4% of patients who were not satisfied due to capsular contracture or scar contracture (26 out of 38) underwent reoperation. Sixteen of the 30 patients who received postoperative radiotherapy (53.3%) chose to undergo reoperation.Conclusions Satisfaction with the cosmetic outcomes of implant placement played a meaningful role in patients’ decisions to undergo reoperation. This tendency may be linked to postoperative radiotherapy, which is a major contributor to complications such as contracture. Nonetheless, a substantial proportion of patients who were satisfied with the outcomes chose to undergo reoperation due to concerns regarding ALCL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在接受关于乳房植入物相关间变性大细胞淋巴瘤的采访后,使用Allergan植入物进行乳房重建的患者再次手术的频率
背景近年来,乳腺植入相关间变性大细胞淋巴瘤(BIA-ALCL)已成为人们关注的一个重要问题。在我们的机构,使用Allergan植入物进行乳房重建的患者被单独告知BIA-ALCL。本研究分析了患者对乳房形状的满意度与是否选择再次手术(植入物移除或替换)之间的相关性。方法2014年12月至2018年4月,采用Allergan植入物进行乳房重建。总共采访了107名患者,不包括那些已经死亡、无法联系或已经接受过再次手术的患者。平均随访时间为53个月(26-73个月)。结果随访后,68名患者推迟了再次手术,29名患者更换了植入物,10名患者移除了植入物。近五分之一(18.9%)对自己的乳房形状感到满意的患者(69人中有13人)因对ALCL的焦虑而接受了再次手术。同时,68.4%的因包膜挛缩或瘢痕挛缩而不满意的患者(38例中有26例)接受了再次手术。在接受术后放疗的30名患者中,有16名(53.3%)选择了再次手术。结论对植入物美容效果的满意度在患者决定再次手术中起着重要作用。这种趋势可能与术后放疗有关,术后放疗是导致挛缩等并发症的主要原因。尽管如此,由于对ALCL的担忧,对结果感到满意的患者中有相当一部分选择了再次手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effects of zinc oxide and zinc aspartic acid chelate on the performance of weaning pigs. Rabbit model for the study of nasal tip plasty: a comparative cephalometric analysis after rhinoplasty Modified cervicofacial transposition flap: a case report of aesthetic considerations after resection of a huge facial squamous cell carcinoma The eye of a maiden in “The Mad Painter” and upper blepharoplasty Subpectoral dissection using an ultrasonic energy device in prosthetic breast reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1