Connecting Twitter With Scholarly Networks: Exploring HCI Scholars’ Interactions From an SNA Approach

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Pub Date : 2022-10-04 DOI:10.1109/TPC.2022.3205511
Long-Jing Hsu;Weijane Lin;Hsiu-Ping Yueh
{"title":"Connecting Twitter With Scholarly Networks: Exploring HCI Scholars’ Interactions From an SNA Approach","authors":"Long-Jing Hsu;Weijane Lin;Hsiu-Ping Yueh","doi":"10.1109/TPC.2022.3205511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<roman><b>Background:</b></roman>\n Building a reputable network on Twitter is viewed as impactful in several scholarly disciplines, but little is known about the professional and interdisciplinary human-computer interaction (HCI) community. This study combined two approaches from scholarly communication and technical communication to capture the static and dynamic features of the HCI scholar Twitter network. \n<roman><b>Literature review:</b></roman>\n Related studies that described the scholarly reputation built through Twitter and social networking in the field of HCI were reviewed and discussed. \n<roman><b>Research questions:</b></roman>\n 1. In which countries are HCI scholars more likely to follow their peers in the same country? 2. What are the characteristics (country, reputation) and actions (reciprocity) of HCI scholars who are more likely to build HCI scholarly network profiles on Twitter? \n<roman><b>Research methodology:</b></roman>\n The network analysis method of the exponential random graph model (ERGM) was adopted to trace and visualize current follower networks on Twitter. \n<roman><b>Results and discussion:</b></roman>\n We found that 22.9% of HCI scholars use Twitter and that reciprocity and country of current employment best drive the Twitter connections of scholars. Characteristics of HCI scholars’ tie formation online are also illustrated and discussed. \n<roman><b>Implications for practice:</b></roman>\n This study contributes to field studies of professional networks by identifying the structural properties and factors that influence scholars’ search for professional development on Twitter. The empirical findings should be a helpful reference for HCI professional societies and individual scholars in operating online professional networks.","PeriodicalId":46950,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","volume":"65 4","pages":"502-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9911236/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Building a reputable network on Twitter is viewed as impactful in several scholarly disciplines, but little is known about the professional and interdisciplinary human-computer interaction (HCI) community. This study combined two approaches from scholarly communication and technical communication to capture the static and dynamic features of the HCI scholar Twitter network. Literature review: Related studies that described the scholarly reputation built through Twitter and social networking in the field of HCI were reviewed and discussed. Research questions: 1. In which countries are HCI scholars more likely to follow their peers in the same country? 2. What are the characteristics (country, reputation) and actions (reciprocity) of HCI scholars who are more likely to build HCI scholarly network profiles on Twitter? Research methodology: The network analysis method of the exponential random graph model (ERGM) was adopted to trace and visualize current follower networks on Twitter. Results and discussion: We found that 22.9% of HCI scholars use Twitter and that reciprocity and country of current employment best drive the Twitter connections of scholars. Characteristics of HCI scholars’ tie formation online are also illustrated and discussed. Implications for practice: This study contributes to field studies of professional networks by identifying the structural properties and factors that influence scholars’ search for professional development on Twitter. The empirical findings should be a helpful reference for HCI professional societies and individual scholars in operating online professional networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连接Twitter与学术网络:从SNA方法探索HCI学者的互动
背景:在Twitter上建立一个信誉良好的网络在一些学术学科中被认为是有影响力的,但对专业和跨学科人机交互(HCI)社区知之甚少。本研究结合学术传播和技术传播两种方法,捕捉HCI学者Twitter网络的静态和动态特征。文献综述:回顾和讨论了通过Twitter和社交网络在HCI领域建立学术声誉的相关研究。研究问题:1;在哪些国家,HCI学者更有可能追随同一国家的同行?2. 更有可能在Twitter上建立HCI学术网络档案的HCI学者的特点(国家、声誉)和行为(互惠)是什么?研究方法:采用指数随机图模型(ERGM)的网络分析方法,对Twitter当前关注者网络进行跟踪和可视化。结果和讨论:我们发现22.9%的HCI学者使用Twitter,互惠和当前就业国家最能推动学者的Twitter联系。本文还对HCI学者在线关系形成的特点进行了阐述和讨论。实践启示:本研究通过识别Twitter上影响学者寻求专业发展的结构特征和因素,为专业网络的实地研究做出了贡献。研究结果可为HCI专业协会和学者个人运营在线专业网络提供有益的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to applied research on professional communication—including but not limited to technical and business communication. Papers should address the research interests and needs of technical communicators, engineers, scientists, information designers, editors, linguists, translators, managers, business professionals, and others from around the globe who practice, conduct research on, and teach others about effective professional communication. The Transactions publishes original, empirical research that addresses one of these contexts: The communication practices of technical professionals, such as engineers and scientists The practices of professional communicators who work in technical or business environments Evidence-based methods for teaching and practicing professional and technical communication.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Information for Authors Getting it Wrong: Student Estimations of Time and the Number of Drafts in Linked Computer Science and Technical Communication Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1