Adjustments and Constraints: Biden Administration’s Iran Policy

Jiahua Tang, R. Pan
{"title":"Adjustments and Constraints: Biden Administration’s Iran Policy","authors":"Jiahua Tang, R. Pan","doi":"10.1080/25765949.2022.2078601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article provides an overview of the recent US Iran policies by comparing the US Middle East strategy under the Biden administration to the Trump administration’s approach. Trump’s ‘maximum pressure’ campaign adopted various aggressive policies including withdrawing from the Iran nuclear agreement and escalating sanction measures against Iran. However, the campaign has proven a failure as it was impeded by Iran’s countermeasures and has damaged the US international reputations. The Biden administration has incentives to improve the US-Iran relations and restore the Iran nuclear deal. However, it faces constraints from both domestic politics and distrust of US alliances. Domestic hardliners have pressured the Biden administration to keep a tough stance on Iran and opposed the US to make concessions as it renegotiates the nuclear deal. Other related countries including the US allies are hesitant to comply with US. In terms of its Middle East strategy, Trump’s betrayal of the previous deal has brought credibility crisis to the US. Though the Iran nuclear talks have restarted, the future of Iran’s nuclear program remains bleak. Divergence is brewing among the US, Iran, and other related powers due to different national interests. Also, the newly elected Iranian presidency, led by ultra conservative leader Ebrahim Raisi’s, makes a new Iran nuclear deal more difficult to obtain. To revive the Iran nuclear agreement, this article suggests that the Biden administration ensure Iran’s interests through cooperation and pay more attention to the social development and people’s livelihood in Iran.","PeriodicalId":29909,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"189 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2022.2078601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article provides an overview of the recent US Iran policies by comparing the US Middle East strategy under the Biden administration to the Trump administration’s approach. Trump’s ‘maximum pressure’ campaign adopted various aggressive policies including withdrawing from the Iran nuclear agreement and escalating sanction measures against Iran. However, the campaign has proven a failure as it was impeded by Iran’s countermeasures and has damaged the US international reputations. The Biden administration has incentives to improve the US-Iran relations and restore the Iran nuclear deal. However, it faces constraints from both domestic politics and distrust of US alliances. Domestic hardliners have pressured the Biden administration to keep a tough stance on Iran and opposed the US to make concessions as it renegotiates the nuclear deal. Other related countries including the US allies are hesitant to comply with US. In terms of its Middle East strategy, Trump’s betrayal of the previous deal has brought credibility crisis to the US. Though the Iran nuclear talks have restarted, the future of Iran’s nuclear program remains bleak. Divergence is brewing among the US, Iran, and other related powers due to different national interests. Also, the newly elected Iranian presidency, led by ultra conservative leader Ebrahim Raisi’s, makes a new Iran nuclear deal more difficult to obtain. To revive the Iran nuclear agreement, this article suggests that the Biden administration ensure Iran’s interests through cooperation and pay more attention to the social development and people’s livelihood in Iran.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调整与制约:拜登政府的伊朗政策
本文通过对比拜登政府和特朗普政府的中东战略,概述了美国近期的对伊政策。特朗普的“极限施压”运动采取了退出伊朗核协议、升级对伊朗制裁等各种咄咄逼人的政策。然而,事实证明,这一行动是失败的,因为它受到伊朗反制措施的阻碍,并损害了美国的国际声誉。拜登政府有改善美伊关系和恢复伊朗核协议的动机。然而,它面临着国内政治和对美国盟友不信任的双重制约。国内强硬派向拜登政府施压,要求其对伊朗保持强硬立场,并反对美国在重新谈判核协议时做出让步。包括美国的盟国在内的其他相关国家都在犹豫是否要遵守美国的规定。在中东战略方面,特朗普对此前协议的背叛给美国带来了信誉危机。虽然伊朗核谈判已经重启,但伊朗核计划的前景仍然黯淡。由于国家利益不同,美国、伊朗等相关大国之间正在酝酿分歧。此外,由极端保守派领导人易卜拉欣·莱希领导的新当选的伊朗总统使得达成新的伊朗核协议变得更加困难。为了重启伊核协议,本文建议拜登政府通过合作确保伊朗的利益,更多地关注伊朗的社会发展和民生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
The Cooperation between China and the Gulf Arab States in the Horn of Africa: From the Perspective of the Global South Hajj Factor in Saudi Arabia and Somaliland Relations China’s Views on Solving the Yemeni Issue Within the Framework of Global Security Initiative Producing Knowledge in the War Zones: Challenges and Risks of Academia in Rojava Israel’s Domestic Policy on Islam-Related Issues: A Preliminary Appraisal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1