The Boundary of Supranational Rules: Revisiting Policy Space Conflicts in Global Trade Politics

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of World Trade Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.54648/trad2021036
Chuanjing Guan, Qinyi Xu
{"title":"The Boundary of Supranational Rules: Revisiting Policy Space Conflicts in Global Trade Politics","authors":"Chuanjing Guan, Qinyi Xu","doi":"10.54648/trad2021036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While global value chains (GVCs) necessitate effective global economic governance in providing a stable, rule-oriented international economic order for the cross-border flow of factors, it is witnessed that there’s an inevitable decline of multilateralism in the WTO in the contemporary era of deep globalization. This empirical puzzle has stimulated various theoretical explorations, including research on the multilateral trade negotiation model, North–South structural conflicts, and the absence of great power responsibility. The increasing friction between great powers around trade policy has illustrated that policy space conflicts constitute the central challenge of global trade governance. Policy space as a concept illustrates the scope and conditionality of domestic policy instruments when framed by supranational rules. By revisiting existing research, this article clarifies the nature of policy space and categorizes its conflict modes as regulatory diffusion, regulatory differentiation, regulatory competition, and regulatory conflict. The practice of global economic governance shows that deep globalization requires the convergence of diverse domestic regulations that reduce policy space; while maintaining competitive advantage of sovereign states in the global production system requires the preservation of certain flexibilities, especially in areas like interventionism, sequential reforms, or capacity building. This inherent tension causes policy space conflicts to evolve in kind with the escalation of competition among great powers in the global division of labour. Since 2017, the WTO reform agenda, US–EU–Japan trilateral coordination, and intense Trumpian trade wars have all proved that regulatory conflict has offered the dominant model. This shift has led to the decline of multilateralism and the weakening of the multilateral trading system.\npolicy space, multilateralism, global value chains, regulatory competition, global trade politics, convergence and de-convergence, WTO reform","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While global value chains (GVCs) necessitate effective global economic governance in providing a stable, rule-oriented international economic order for the cross-border flow of factors, it is witnessed that there’s an inevitable decline of multilateralism in the WTO in the contemporary era of deep globalization. This empirical puzzle has stimulated various theoretical explorations, including research on the multilateral trade negotiation model, North–South structural conflicts, and the absence of great power responsibility. The increasing friction between great powers around trade policy has illustrated that policy space conflicts constitute the central challenge of global trade governance. Policy space as a concept illustrates the scope and conditionality of domestic policy instruments when framed by supranational rules. By revisiting existing research, this article clarifies the nature of policy space and categorizes its conflict modes as regulatory diffusion, regulatory differentiation, regulatory competition, and regulatory conflict. The practice of global economic governance shows that deep globalization requires the convergence of diverse domestic regulations that reduce policy space; while maintaining competitive advantage of sovereign states in the global production system requires the preservation of certain flexibilities, especially in areas like interventionism, sequential reforms, or capacity building. This inherent tension causes policy space conflicts to evolve in kind with the escalation of competition among great powers in the global division of labour. Since 2017, the WTO reform agenda, US–EU–Japan trilateral coordination, and intense Trumpian trade wars have all proved that regulatory conflict has offered the dominant model. This shift has led to the decline of multilateralism and the weakening of the multilateral trading system. policy space, multilateralism, global value chains, regulatory competition, global trade politics, convergence and de-convergence, WTO reform
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超国家规则的边界:重新审视全球贸易政治中的政策空间冲突
尽管全球价值链需要有效的全球经济治理,为要素的跨境流动提供稳定、规则导向的国际经济秩序,但在深度全球化的当代,世贸组织的多边主义不可避免地衰落。这一经验谜题激发了各种理论探索,包括对多边贸易谈判模式、南北结构性冲突和大国责任缺失的研究。大国之间围绕贸易政策日益加剧的摩擦表明,政策空间冲突构成了全球贸易治理的核心挑战。政策空间作为一个概念,说明了在超国家规则的框架下,国内政策工具的范围和条件。通过重新审视现有研究,本文阐明了政策空间的性质,并将其冲突模式分为监管扩散、监管分化、监管竞争和监管冲突。全球经济治理的实践表明,深度全球化需要多种国内法规的趋同,从而缩小政策空间;在保持主权国家在全球生产体系中的竞争优势的同时,需要保持一定的灵活性,尤其是在干预主义、顺序改革或能力建设等领域。这种内在的紧张关系导致政策空间冲突随着大国之间在全球分工中的竞争升级而演变。自2017年以来,世贸组织改革议程、美国-欧盟-日本三方协调以及激烈的特朗普贸易战都证明,监管冲突提供了主导模式。这种转变导致了多边主义的衰落和多边贸易体系的削弱。政策空间、多边主义、全球价值链、监管竞争、全球贸易政治、趋同与去趋同、世贸组织改革
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Test Data Protection in China-US Trade War: Integrating Empirical and Normative Analysis The WTO and Using Digital Economy Technologies: Surviving the Race With Preferential Trade Agreements A Tale of Too Little: Anti-dumping Tariff Between SAFTA Contracting Parties Game Analysis of Different Source Disclosure Model for Genetic Resources and Implications for China Improving Export Credit Agency Impact Through Full Faith and Credit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1