The legal framework of on call duty for teleworkers

Mihaela-Emilia Marica
{"title":"The legal framework of on call duty for teleworkers","authors":"Mihaela-Emilia Marica","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2023/13/1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today’s Labour Law acknowledges the importance of flexibility in the individual work relationships by the widescale use of teleworking programs. However, the teleworking phenomenon proliferates in parallel with an opposite trend, by which teleworkers are less protected, as a consequence of the current practices by which they are required to respond work-related calls at any time, wherever they are, and the general standards regulating the working time are ignored. While the European Union states show obvious concern with removing such risks, the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union, given in its interpretation of the Directive concerning certain aspects in the organization of working time, is extremely important. The present study starts from the analysis of certain points in the content of the Working Time Directive 2003/88 adopted across the European Union with regard to the working time, and goes on to provide an overview of relevant decisions issued by the CJEU on working time, then draws conclusions on the legal framework (juridical regime) of on-call duty in the case of teleworkers.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2023/13/1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today’s Labour Law acknowledges the importance of flexibility in the individual work relationships by the widescale use of teleworking programs. However, the teleworking phenomenon proliferates in parallel with an opposite trend, by which teleworkers are less protected, as a consequence of the current practices by which they are required to respond work-related calls at any time, wherever they are, and the general standards regulating the working time are ignored. While the European Union states show obvious concern with removing such risks, the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union, given in its interpretation of the Directive concerning certain aspects in the organization of working time, is extremely important. The present study starts from the analysis of certain points in the content of the Working Time Directive 2003/88 adopted across the European Union with regard to the working time, and goes on to provide an overview of relevant decisions issued by the CJEU on working time, then draws conclusions on the legal framework (juridical regime) of on-call duty in the case of teleworkers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程工作者随叫随到义务的法律框架
今天的《劳动法》通过广泛使用远程工作计划,承认个人工作关系中灵活性的重要性。然而,远程工作现象与另一种相反的趋势同时扩散,即远程工作者受到的保护较少,因为目前的做法要求他们随时随地响应与工作有关的电话,而规范工作时间的一般标准被忽视了。虽然欧洲联盟各国对消除这种风险表现出明显的关切,但欧洲联盟法院在解释有关工作时间安排某些方面的指令时所采取的做法极为重要。本研究从分析整个欧盟在工作时间方面采用的2003/88工作时间指令内容中的某些要点开始,然后概述欧洲法院就工作时间发布的相关决定,然后得出远程工作者随叫随到的法律框架(司法制度)的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure Preventing computer crime by knowing the legal regulations that ensure the protection of computer systems A regulatory analysis of digital financial services and the adoption of central bank digital currencies in Zimbabwe and South Africa Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1